Skip to comments.
EPA Honors Fake Employee
National Review ^
| June 3, 2013
| Eliana Johnson
Posted on 06/03/2013 8:33:14 AM PDT by grundle
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-23 last
To: kcvl
“Fake but accurate”, as Dan Rather Biased used to say.
21
posted on
06/03/2013 10:07:22 AM PDT
by
TurboZamboni
(Marx smelled bad & lived with his parents most his life.)
To: workerbee
Comrade Ogilvie from “1984”.
22
posted on
06/03/2013 10:51:22 AM PDT
by
Corey Ohlis
(Visualize Swirled Peas)
To: grundle
When I read the comments on National Review and other online fora, I see a constant refrain of "explanation" of why she and other high-ranking people need to do this sort of thing because otherwise they would be inundated with spam and gratuitous email. Frankly these folks are either clueless on how legitimate email systems work, or they are trying to pander to "common knowledge", ie trying to sway peoples perception with a facile explanation rooted in what "everybody knows".
However this doesn't ring true to anyone who understands how email works. Modern email systems are perfectly capable of classifying incoming and outgoing messages by class, sender, distinguishing digital signatures, and routing accordingly. This argument of "well of course it has to be that way" is a snark and smacks of "sock puppetry" (google is your friend here).
23
posted on
06/03/2013 10:21:52 PM PDT
by
no-s
(when democracy is displaced by tyranny, the armed citizen still gets to vote)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-23 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson