Posted on 05/19/2013 10:59:00 PM PDT by LibWhacker
In light of what I just heard about Oklahoma the pettiness of our discussion has smashed me in the head like a brick. Adios. God bless.
And I am betting that you are no more on the mark than Bruno. The more evidence we have, the less we seem to know: about the cosmos or about the sub-atomic world. Maybe only angels can know such things.
Which appears to directly subvert the premise of your previous statement; "And I am betting that you are no more on the mark than Bruno"...
Or is this one of those things where you don't actually know the answer, but just wanted to point out the invalidity of someone Else's theorem absent anything cogent with which to base said criticisms on?
The Universe recycles itself. Continually. Virtual particle pairs creating real photons which interact with other particle pairs to create real particles that form basic hydrogen that forms suns that create heavier elements that eventually get sucked into a "black hole" that evaporates into local space/time as virtual particle pair perturbation kicked up from the quantum foam...
And round and round we go.
What I do know that is you are proposing as definite is what the math does not allow us to say definitely. What we are looking at may be beyond our powers to describe, except by analogy. Even then we don’t have the palet we need.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.