Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

On the Second Amendment, Kansas points the way
dailycaller.com ^ | 18 April, 2013 | Mike Maharrey

Posted on 04/29/2013 4:43:57 PM PDT by marktwain

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-54 last
To: MeganC

“The Second Civil War may have just started. God Bless the united States of America.”

No, not yet.

Kansas and her Sister states have no intention of provoking a Federal invasion, Not yet anyway.

Kansas is taking a bold step beyond mere nullification and into the domain of interposition but even so I do not believe she intends to tried much into that territory. It would be foolish of her to do so before her sister States are ready to back her and do likewise.

For now Kansas needs to let the feds try(and find innocent of course) their own officers. Let this be a political stunt to display the self-serving corruption of the Federal courts. That is exactly what needs to happen politically, before we move on to real interposition.

For now nullification is where we need to go, and I remind you the whole propose of nullification is to legitimize just resistance to unjust federal usurpation of so named rights of the people. This is the beginning of a movement against Washington, but we must have a large number of our sister states morally and practically behind us before we move on.


41 posted on 04/30/2013 12:39:10 PM PDT by Monorprise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Trod Upon

Let the Federal employees in black robes enforce their own edicts.

That being said Kansas is legitimization resistance to Federal usurpation. They are not seriously intending to move solidly into interposition. It is not time for that and Kansas knows it.

Instead Kansas is setting up the next political ‘stunt’ which we need to be preparing ourselves to take advantage of.

This this ‘stunt’ will be to highlight the self-serving corruption of the Federal employees in black robes, thus further undermining their legitimacy and paving the political path towards effective acts of interposition.


42 posted on 04/30/2013 12:48:22 PM PDT by Monorprise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: American Quilter; demshateGod; central_va

You would not like the weather. Maybe we could work out a temporary residence exchange or vacation swap. I’m pretty sure you all would change your minds, I would have to return to Kansas, and you all could not wait to get back home.


43 posted on 05/01/2013 12:14:41 AM PDT by tdscpa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Old Yeller
We did not kick her worthless butt out. She got drafted into the Owe-bama army for the war against America.
44 posted on 05/02/2013 1:20:18 AM PDT by tdscpa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: tdscpa

I’m in the Kansas City area now doing interviews. I am moving here (Lord willing). The weather cant be worse than Oklahoma.


45 posted on 05/02/2013 4:07:25 AM PDT by demshateGod (The fool hath said in his heart, There is no God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: 0.E.O
So they cannot enforce federal laws prohibiting firearms that are manufactured in Kansas from being brought into a federal courthouse or a federal prison?

Noob you are making up arguments. Kansas law states you can not carry Any place where the carrying of firearms is prohibited by federal or state law.

46 posted on 05/02/2013 4:32:05 AM PDT by Starstruck (Don't rest. We came close to the 2nd Amendment being field tested.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Starstruck
Noob you are making up arguments. Kansas law states you can not carry Any place where the carrying of firearms is prohibited by federal or state law.

But any federal law prohibiting the carrying of firearms manufactured and carried in the state of Kansas are null and void. Or didn't you read the article, old timer?

47 posted on 05/02/2013 4:42:23 AM PDT by 0.E.O
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: 0.E.O
But any federal law prohibiting the carrying of firearms manufactured and carried in the state of Kansas are null and void. Or didn't you read the article, old timer?

But the law I just quoted was a State law not a Federal law. This new law did not overide existing Kansas State laws.

48 posted on 05/02/2013 8:19:06 AM PDT by Starstruck (Don't rest. We came close to the 2nd Amendment being field tested.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Starstruck
But the law I just quoted was a State law not a Federal law. This new law did not overide existing Kansas State laws.

OK, let me try this again. According to you, in Kansas you can't carry a firearm anywhere that state or federal law prohibits it. But this act nullifies all federal laws restricting gun ownership, so the only restriction is where Kansas law prohibits it. Irony aside, states can pass laws restricting carrying in state buildings, state courts, state prisons, state law enforcement facilities, state schools, what have you. They cannot pass laws prohibiting or allowing carrying in federal courts, federal buildings, federal prisons, any facility owned and controlled by the federal government. Only Congress can do that. And no matter what Congress says, those kind of laws cannot be enforced in Kansas. So by rights the people of Kansas should be able to take their firearms into federal court, federal buildings, any federal facility they want so long as they are approved to carry by the state of Kansas and, possibly, only if the gun was manufactured in the state.

Clear now?

49 posted on 05/02/2013 8:37:51 AM PDT by 0.E.O
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: 0.E.O
But this act nullifies all federal laws restricting gun ownership

Still not seeing where restricting where you can carry restricts owning a gun. You can't enter my house with a gun unless I allow it. I'm not restricting you from owning a gun.

50 posted on 05/02/2013 9:39:06 AM PDT by Starstruck (Don't rest. We came close to the 2nd Amendment being field tested.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: 0.E.O; central_va

0.E.O

Zero (Obama’s) Executive Orders.

I’m on to you.


51 posted on 05/02/2013 9:49:00 AM PDT by Lazamataz ("AP" clearly stands for American Pravda. Our news media has become completely and proudly Soviet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Starstruck
Still not seeing where restricting where you can carry restricts owning a gun. You can't enter my house with a gun unless I allow it. I'm not restricting you from owning a gun.

And others would no doubt disagree. So I guess it depends on how one interprets the Second Amendment as to which federal laws restricting gun ownership, if any, are still valid under the Kansas law.

52 posted on 05/02/2013 10:00:13 AM PDT by 0.E.O
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz
Zero (Obama’s) Executive Orders.

Which ones?

I’m on to you.

Are you now? So let me ask you, just what do you think this law will accomplish?

53 posted on 05/02/2013 10:03:08 AM PDT by 0.E.O
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: 0.E.O
"Zero (Obama’s) Executive Orders."
Which ones?

The bad ones.

"I’m on to you."
Are you now? So let me ask you, just what do you think this law will accomplish?

You already know.

54 posted on 05/02/2013 10:40:39 AM PDT by Lazamataz ("AP" clearly stands for American Pravda. Our news media has become completely and proudly Soviet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-54 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson