Skip to comments.
THREATS AGAINST BENGHAZI WHISTLEBLOWERS ALLEGED
Greta Wire ^
| 04.29.13
| James Rosen
Posted on 04/29/2013 3:29:17 PM PDT by Perdogg
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61 next last
1
posted on
04/29/2013 3:29:17 PM PDT
by
Perdogg
To: Perdogg
Obama did say he would side with the Muslims.
2
posted on
04/29/2013 3:33:52 PM PDT
by
RginTN
To: Perdogg
3
posted on
04/29/2013 3:35:03 PM PDT
by
Doogle
(USAF.68-73..8th TFW Ubon Thailand..never store a threat you should have eliminated))
To: Perdogg
4
posted on
04/29/2013 3:37:44 PM PDT
by
gaijin
To: gaijin
5
posted on
04/29/2013 3:39:17 PM PDT
by
gaijin
To: Perdogg
Ironic that Hanoi Jane is in the news. Anyone besides me thing that these brave souls will end up victims of the Hanoi GOP when they (GOP)sell them (whistleblowers) out?
To: Perdogg
Unnamed Obama admin officials? Has it come to this? Now you not only don’t need a birth certificate, you don’t need a name?
7
posted on
04/29/2013 3:39:27 PM PDT
by
glock rocks
(Slippin into darkness, when I hear my mama say ...)
To: Perdogg
Nobody should be surprised by this. Nobody.
At least, anyone whose had their "thinking hat" on, knows that the usurper has threatened anyone who dare to question his Constitutional eligibility to be the Commander in Chief to begin with. Let alone, carry out all of the subsequent subversion/destruction/lies and other unconstitutional acts.
8
posted on
04/29/2013 3:39:33 PM PDT
by
rxsid
(HOW CAN A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN'S STATUS BE "GOVERNED" BY GREAT BRITAIN? - Leo Donofrio (2009))
To: Perdogg
They don’t need lawyers, they need 24/7/365 protection that can’t be bought out by the other side.
I’d suggest some retired SEALs.
9
posted on
04/29/2013 3:40:45 PM PDT
by
wastedyears
(I'm a gamer not because I choose to have no life, but because I choose to have many.)
To: Doogle
10
posted on
04/29/2013 3:41:05 PM PDT
by
chiller
(NBCNews et al is in the tank and should be embarrassed)
To: gaijin
Yo, POSHITUS, how does the de-coup d’tat feel for ya?
11
posted on
04/29/2013 3:41:22 PM PDT
by
txhurl
To: Perdogg
To: Perdogg
Why can’t these witnesses testify before the House Select Committee on Intelligence? Surely the members and staff must already have clearances that enable them to discuss Benghazi or whatever they want. Otherwise, why have the committee at all?
14
posted on
04/29/2013 3:42:52 PM PDT
by
RedMDer
(May we always be happy and may our enemies always know it. - Sarah Palin, 10-18-2010)
To: Perdogg
It is unavoidable that Department employees identifying themselves as witnesses in the Committees investigation will apply for a security clearance to allow their personal attorneys to handle sensitive or classified material, Issa wrote. What's wrong with selecting a lawyer who already has such a clearance?
15
posted on
04/29/2013 3:43:56 PM PDT
by
Carry_Okie
(An economy is not a zero-sum game, but politics usually is.)
To: Perdogg
Since this orginated with FNC the MSM will ignore it.....at their peril, once the hearings begin.
16
posted on
04/29/2013 3:46:06 PM PDT
by
clintonh8r
("Europe was created by history. America was created by a philosophy." Baroness Thatcher)
To: txhurl
We've become so calloused to his administration's behaviour, we (me) forget that it's clear they are subverting the country and its laws.
impeach for dereliction of duty.
17
posted on
04/29/2013 3:46:46 PM PDT
by
chiller
(NBCNews et al is in the tank and should be embarrassed)
To: dennisw; Cachelot; Nix 2; veronica; Catspaw; knighthawk; Alouette; Optimist; weikel; Lent; GregB; ..
Middle East and terrorism, occasional political and Jewish issues Ping List. High Volume
If youd like to be on or off, please FR mail me.
..................
Good for them. I understand testimony is being held up because State won't process their attorneys security clearances. Security clearances are routine in cases like this. Victoria Toensing, who represents someone, has been complaining about this.
18
posted on
04/29/2013 3:47:04 PM PDT
by
SJackson
(The Pilgrims—Doing the jobs Native Americans wouldn’t do !)
To: Starboard
Testify without representation? They’re not stupid, and there’s no reason for their attorneys not to be cleared.
19
posted on
04/29/2013 3:49:07 PM PDT
by
SJackson
(The Pilgrims—Doing the jobs Native Americans wouldn’t do !)
To: Starboard
Why cant these witnesses testify before the House Select Committee on Intelligence? Surely the members and staff must already have clearances that enable them to discuss Benghazi or whatever they want. Otherwise, why have the committee at all?
Because........from the article
And that should be enough, Ventrell said at Mondays press briefing. Congress has its own prerogatives, but weve had a very thorough, independent investigation, which we completed and [which was] transparent and shared. And there are many folks who are, in a political manner, trying to sort of use this for their own political means, or ends.
20
posted on
04/29/2013 3:49:48 PM PDT
by
txhurl
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson