Cruz Sends Scarborough and Maddow of MSNBC Into Conniptions

The New American ^ | Mar. 17, 2013 | Thomas R. Eddlem

[nascarnation]

Yes I remember the CNBC study showing Congress members making “market crushing” investment returns.

[manic4organic]

"Just wait till the NBC scab pickers jump on Cruz’s parentage..."

Well, he is a white Hispanic. s/

[TigersEye]

“where Scarborough essentially argued that it doesn’t matter what the Second Amendment says”

The communist Progressives certainly do not care what any part of the Constitution says. Their aim is to destroy it.

[lonestar]

http://newsbusters.org/node/12481

[nascarnation]

Another sad commentary on California.
She ran 3 points ahead of Caliph Baraq in 2012.

[EDINVA]

Scarborough crossed over from his first days at MSNBC. Nothing new here. The first time I watched he had just started there and took advantage of his new soapbox to attack FoxNews and conservatives. Never turned his show on again.

[lonestar]

She should be in the pen!

Martha Stewart should take lessons from DiFi.

[skinkinthegrass]

Cruz is also driving the Moldy class insane. It is a good thing...a great description of the problem...
of course; E$tabli$hment shall "disagree"

[nascarnation]

We may have some fun out of this yet.

Some FReepers have surmised that the Dems no longer even consider Republicans a threat, and are beginning the inevitable internal war, like Stalin’s purges.

[PapaNew]

Can an individual own it's modern equivalent - a small army with machine guns, helicotpers and .50 cals?

It's an interesting, worthwhile, and relevant discussion - one that sooner or later may be headed for SCOTUS, where focused research into original textual meaning, understanding, and intent has (and should) take place. (That is not to say the same should not take place in the legislature or the executive branch, but unfortunately, it has historically been left to the judicial branch to do this.)

You never know what SCOTUS is going to do especially when populated, as it seemly always has been, by those willing to ignore or change the Constitution from the bench so as to make the "supreme Law of the Land" (the Constitution itself - Article VI, paragraph 2) fit their own personal set of values and morals.

Gun ownership is, in whatever the scope of the original meaning of "bearing arms" is, clearly our right. You may have a problem with your personal army, however, becasue this power is reserved for Congress in Article I, Section 8 and forbidden for states in Section 10, Paragraph 3 in the Constitution ("No state shall...keep Troops...").

[Forty-Niner]

The difference between a Conservative and a liberal is that Conservatives believe in the Rule of Law vrs the liberal’s Cult of Personality. From your post I’ll have to put you down on the side of the cultists....

Article II is NOT an “obscure exclusionary rule.” Observe Obama and you’ll see the very reason for the Founders wanting only Natural Born Citizens as the Chief Executive.

You are a fool. Your Hobson’s choice is unrealistic. A real Conservative that does not meet the standards of Article would not run.....Cruz will NEVER be so foolish as to cross that line despite Cultists like you urging him on.....

“Scab man?” KMA

[varon]

The Amendments are explicitly worded, and easily understood. that we have allowed ONE INCH of any type of control on free speech, gun control, or impediments to our freedoms was a terrible oversight on the American People’s watch.

AND we don't need their permission to reverse the infringements and hold the perpetrators accountable!!!

[Forty-Niner]

You are so right.

Feinstein is certainly a political opportunist, and her lust for power is coupled to her penchant for corruption.

A throughly disgusting individual.

[Cheerio]

The proposed gun control bill doesn’t “prohibit” the guns it prohibits. It simply “exempts” the 2,271 it doesn’t prohibit. So in her mind there is no prohibition.

I caught that also when listening to her feeble defense against the mighty Cruz. This is what went through my mind - "Is there a section in the bill that allows the DOJ to change the rules on which weapons are exempted at will whenever they choose"? Similar to Sibelius making law from her cabinet post on Obamacare.

Why cannot a leftard understand 2A when it says "the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.

The leftards have every right to pass laws saying which weapons made exclusively to military specs can be sold on the open commercial market and which ones are subject to ITAR and USML. If designed and built by a commercial company - NO. As long as they comply with laws on the books today (e.g. no fully automatic weapons). However I understand there actually is a way for a private citizen to own fully automatic weapons but that gets rather complicated.

[Cheerio]

The communist Progressives certainly do not care what any part of the Constitution says. Their aim is to destroy it.

The clown in the WH and his RAT party have already made a mockery of the US Constitution, while the Repubs sit idly by in their comfortable House seats and hold hearing after hearing after hearing never getting any answer and never bringing up the "I" word for fear of being called racist by the lame stream media and their RAT counterparts sitting across the isle.

[antceecee]

I don’t worship anyone but the Lord God and Jesus Christ. Get over yourself. You, on the other hand.. obviously cannot believe Senator Cruz when he says that Sarah was instrumental in his getting elected. You know sometimes.. ya’ can’t fix stupid!!!!!!!!!! (My husband just said that, but he didn’t tell me to post it, but it just fits so well).

[lonestar]

You know sometimes.. ya’ can’t fix stupid!!!!!!!!!!

How original! LOL!

I voted for Cruz. Twice. (In the primary & in the general. I'm not a Dem) Sarah Palin had ZERO to do with it!

The debate had a lot to do with Cruz winning. Dewhurst was horrible in the debate.

[antceecee]

Yes it is not original and completely applies to you my FRiend. You are in complete and total denial with regard to the stated FACT that Senator Cruz and many many others acknowledge the assistance of Sarah Palin being INSTRUMENTAL in helping him to succeed in his election!! What part of that do you not understand???? Your personal support is appreciated, but I doubt that your support put him over the top. Get it??? If you don’t.. go back to the non original reply... rinse and repeat!!!

[Graewoulf]

” - - - You have to be on offense to score points. - - - “

Obvious to all but the GOP Elite.

[ROCKLOBSTER]

Donks

That is not, and never was a donkey.