“Somebody brought you”?
Bwahaha!
I suppose somebody must have likewise carried those “Native” American ancestors across the Bering Strait.
Yeah, my Huguenot 14th great grandfather entered Nieuw Amsterdam* on a tourist visa in 1645 and immediately applied for welfare and had 12 children by eight different women, when he wasn’t using his EBT card to buy lap dances.
But a least he wasn’t a married man who came over on a student exchange program and knocked up a ditsy coed and spent his time partying and carousing until he was sent home for academic failure.
*Actually, Buschwick, and according to the Nieuw Nederlands census he owned a goat and by 1695 he was a Dutch Reform Pastor on Staten Island.
Yeah, my Huguenot 14th great grandfather entered Nieuw Amsterdam* on a tourist visa in 1645 and immediately applied for welfare and had 12 children by eight different women, when he wasn’t using his EBT card to buy lap dances.
But a least he wasn’t a married man who came over on a student exchange program and knocked up a ditsy coed and spent his time partying and carousing until he was sent home for academic failure.
*Actually, Buschwick, and according to the Nieuw Nederlands census he owned a goat and by 1695 he was a Dutch Reform Pastor on Staten Island.
I was born on US soil, jackass.
I am a native American, as I was born in Saginaw, Michigan. That’s what native means. I realize they came up with the euphamism “Native American” to replace misleading terms like “Indian” and supposedly insulting ones like “redskin” in order to beat us over the head with political correctness. But my descension from lines that were European a few generations ago doesn’t make me less native than injuns.
“Senior Americans” is a better term them, i in line with Obama’s point nativity is determined by your line. There is no such thing as a native American in that sense given that according to current science humanity came out of Africa.
I came from my parents, but I was born on American Soil to American Citizens. Can Odipsnot say the same?
Tell Swee Pea that the native americans came from somewhere else, too, they didn’t spring out of the ground
No one brought me here, I was born in Taylor, Texas you dumb@$$.
Someone else built my business. Now someone brought me here? Who are these people? Does he have imaginary friends?
Obama is indeed a very thick individual.
So either they came from Asia or "Mother Africa".
Well, even among "native" peoples, there was conquering and war. Don't hold up the Aztecs as some higher moral peoples considerate of diversity.
My fathers side of the family has been here since 1772. I have an ancestor who fought in Washingtons army.
I am offended when some illegal alien tells me I am somehow illegitimate.
My forefathers created the United States of America.
They have fought in every major war since serving as an officer in George Washington’s army.
This may be the land that native americans occupied first, but their primitive culture could not have created the great country that is here now.
Sorry obama, unlike you — I was born here. My grandparents came over on the boat from Italy. They passed through Ellis Island and achieved their citizenship the legal way. So FUBO.
There is a growing, albeit very quietly and very slowly, theory that puts EUROPEANS in the America's BEFORE the American Indians got here.
Radical theory of first Americans places Stone Age Europeans in Delmarva 20,000 years ago
By Brian Vastag,February 29, 2012
When the crew of the Virginia scallop trawler Cinmar hauled a mastodon tusk onto the deck in 1970, another oddity dropped out of the net: a dark, tapered stone blade, nearly eight inches long and still sharp.
Forty years later, this rediscovered prehistoric slasher has reopened debate on a radical theory about who the first Americans were and when they got here.
Archaeologists have long held that North America remained unpopulated until about 15,000 years ago, when Siberian people walked or boated into Alaska and then moved down the West Coast.
But the mastodon relic found near the mouth of the Chesapeake Bay turned out to be 22,000 years old, suggesting that the blade was just as ancient.
Whoever fashioned that blade was not supposed to be here.
Its makers probably paddled from Europe and arrived in America thousands of years ahead of the western migration, making them the first Americans, argues Smithsonian Institution anthropologist Dennis Stanford.
“I think it’s feasible,” said Tom Dillehay, a prominent archaeologist at Vanderbilt University. “The evidence is building up, and it certainly warrants discussion.”
And...
First Humans To Settle Americas Came From Europe, Not From Asia Over Bering Strait Land-Ice Bridge, New Research Suggestshttp://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2008/07/080701193203.htm
July 17, 2008Research by a Valparaiso University geography professor and his students on the creation of Kankakee Sand Islands of Northwest Indiana is lending support to evidence that the first humans to settle the Americas came from Europe, a discovery that overturns decades of classroom lessons that nomadic tribes from Asia crossed a Bering Strait land-ice bridge.
...
And...
First Americans May Have Been European
Bjorn Carey
Date: 19 February 2006 Time: 03:16 PM ETST. LOUIS—The first humans to spread across North America may have been seal hunters from France and Spain.
This runs counter to the long-held belief that the first human entry into the Americas was a crossing of a land-ice bridge that spanned the Bering Strait about 13,500 years ago.
...
The tools don’t match
Recent studies have suggested that the glaciers that helped form the bridge connecting Siberia and Alaska began receding around 17,000 to 13,000 years ago, leaving very little chance that people walked from one continent to the other.
Also, when archaeologist Dennis Stanford of the Smithsonian Institution places American spearheads, called Clovis points, side-by-side with Siberian points, he sees a divergence of many characteristics.
Instead, Stanford said today, Clovis points match up much closer with Solutrean style tools, which researchers date to about 19,000 years ago. This suggests that the American people making Clovis points made Solutrean points before that.
There’s just one problem with this hypothesis—Solutrean toolmakers lived in France and Spain. Scientists know of no land-ice bridge that spanned that entire gap.
...
And...
Evidence grows N. America's first colonizers were European
The Japan Times
November 29, 1999
The ObserverLONDON — Stone Age Europeans were the first trans-Atlantic sailors. Columbus and the Vikings were mere ocean-crossing latecomers, according to a leading American anthropologist. Dennis Stanford, of the Smithsonian Institution in Washington, says Neolithic fishermen and hunters sailed the Atlantic in tiny boats made of animal skins 18,000 years ago and colonized the eastern United States.
Such a journey would represent one of the most astonishing migrations ever undertaken — the Earth was then in the grip of the Ice Age and much of its high northern and southern latitudes were desolate wastelands blasted by storms and blizzards.
On the other hand, much of the planet's water was locked in icecaps and glaciers, and sea levels would have been much lower than today's. The edges of the continents would have extended further into the oceans.
"The gap between Europe and America was greatly reduced," Stanford said. "It could have been quite feasible for fishermen and whale and seal hunters to sail around the southern rim of the packs of sea-ice that covered the North Atlantic and reach land around the Banks of Newfoundland."
Stanford's theory — outlined at a recent archaeology conference in Santa Fe, N.M. — is based on discoveries indicating ancient American people were culturally far more like the Neolithic tribes of France, Spain and Ireland than the Asian people whom scientists had previously thought to be the sole prehistoric settlers of North America.
Stanford also points out although modern Native Americans possess DNA similar to that of Asians, they also carry some variants found only in European people. This genetic input could only be explained by accepting Stone Age people could sail ocean-going boats, he said.
"We now know that human beings learned to sail 50,000 years before the present," he said. "Mankind settled in Australia then and it was not linked by any land bridge to Asia. It could only have been reached by boat. Clearly, we had mastered sailing tens of thousands of years before America was colonized, so we should not be surprised by the idea that people took boat trips across the Atlantic 18,000 years ago."
...
And...
New evidence suggests Stone Age hunters from Europe discovered America
David Keys Tuesday 28 February 2012New archaeological evidence suggests that America was first discovered by Stone Age people from Europe – 10,000 years before the Siberian-originating ancestors of the American Indians set foot in the New World.
A remarkable series of several dozen European-style stone tools, dating back between 19,000 and 26,000 years, have been discovered at six locations along the US east coast. Three of the sites are on the Delmarva Peninsular in Maryland, discovered by archaeologist Dr Darrin Lowery of the University of Delaware. One is in Pennsylvania and another in Virginia. A sixth was discovered by scallop-dredging fishermen on the seabed 60 miles from the Virginian coast on what, in prehistoric times, would have been dry land.
...
The similarity between other later east coast US and European Stone Age stone tool technologies has been noted before. But all the US European-style tools, unearthed before the discovery or dating of the recently found or dated US east coast sites, were from around 15,000 years ago - long after Stone Age Europeans (the Solutrean cultures of France and Iberia) had ceased making such artefacts. Most archaeologists had therefore rejected any possibility of a connection.But the newly-discovered and recently-dated early Maryland and other US east coast Stone Age tools are from between 26,000 and 19,000 years ago - and are therefore contemporary with the virtually identical western European material.
What’s more, chemical analysis carried out last year on a European-style stone knife found in Virginia back in 1971 revealed that it was made of French-originating flint.
But the new Maryland, Virginia and other US east coast material, and the chemical tests on the Virginian flint knife, have begun to transform the situation. Now archaeologists are starting to investigate half a dozen new sites in Tennessee, Maryland and even Texas – and these locations are expected to produce more evidence.
Another key argument for Stanford and Bradley’s proposal is the complete absence of any human activity in north-east Siberia and Alaska prior to around 15,500 years ago. If the Maryland and other east coast people of 26,000 to 19,000 years ago had come from Asia, not Europe, early material, dating from before 19,000 years ago, should have turned up in those two northern areas, but none have been found.
Although Solutrean Europeans may well have been the first Americans, they had a major disadvantage compared to the Asian-originating Indians who entered the New World via the Bering Straits or along the Aleutian Islands chain after 15,500 years ago.
Whereas the Solutreans had only had a 4500 year long ‘Ice Age’ window to carry out their migratory activity, the Asian-originating Indians had some 15,000 years to do it. What’s more, the latter two-thirds of that 15 millennia long period was climatologically much more favourable and substantially larger numbers of Asians were therefore able to migrate.
As a result of these factors the Solutrean (European originating) Native Americans were either partly absorbed by the newcomers or were substantially obliterated by them either physically or through competition for resources.
...
And finally, a story which ties in with the above:
Does skull prove that the first Americans came from Europe?http://www.utexas.edu/courses/stross/ant322m_files/1stpersons.htm
By Steve Connor Science Editor
03 December 2002Scientists in Britain have identified the oldest skeleton ever found on the American continent in a discovery that raises fresh questions about the accepted theory of how the first people arrived in the New World. The skeleton's perfectly preserved skull belonged to a 26-year-old woman who died during the last ice age on the edge of a giant prehistoric lake which once formed around an area now occupied by the sprawling suburbs of Mexico City.
Scientists from Liverpool's John Moores University and Oxford's Research Laboratory of Archaeology have dated the skull to about 13,000 years old, making it 2,000 years older than the previous record for the continent's oldest human remains. However, the most intriguing aspect of the skull is that it is long and narrow and typically Caucasian in appearance, like the heads of white, western Europeans today. Modern-day native Americans, however, have short, wide skulls that are typical of their Mongoloid ancestors who are known to have crossed into America from Asia on an ice-age land bridge that had formed across the Bering Strait.
The extreme age of Peñon woman suggests two scenarios. Either there was a much earlier migration of Caucasian-like people with long, narrow skulls across the Bering Strait and that these people were later replaced by a subsequent migration of Mongoloid people. Alternatively, and more controversially, a group of Stone Age people from Europe made the perilous sea journey across the Atlantic Ocean many thousands of years before Columbus or the Vikings.
Silvia Gonzalez, a Mexican-born archaeologist working at John Moores University and the leader of the research team, accepted yesterday that her discovery lends weight to the highly contentious idea that the first Americans may have actually been Europeans. "At the moment it points to that as being likely. They were definitely not Mongoloid in appearance. They were from somewhere else. As to whether they were European, at this point in time we cannot say 'no'," Dr. Gonzalez said.
The skull and the almost-complete skeleton of Peñon woman was actually unearthed in 1959 and was thought to be no older than about 5,000 years. It formed part of a collection of 27 early humans in the National Museum of Anthropology in Mexico City that had not been accurately dated using the most modern techniques.
The findings have a resonance with the skull and skeleton of Kennewick man, who was unearthed in 1996 in the Columbia River at the town of Kennewick in Washington state. The skull, estimated to be 8,400 years old, is also long and narrow and typically Caucasian.
James Chatters, one of the first anthropologists to study Kennewick man before it had been properly dated, even thought that the man may have been a European trapper who had met a sudden death sometime in the early 19th century. Kennewick man became the most controversial figure in American anthropology when native tribes living in the region claimed that, as an ancestor, his remains should be returned to them under a 1990 law that gave special protection to the graves and remains of indigenous Americans. The debate intensified after some anthropologists suggested that
Kennewick man was Caucasian in origin and could not therefore be a direct ancestor of the native Americans living in the Kennewick area today. Dr Gonzalez said that the identification of Peñon woman as the oldest known inhabitant of the American continent throws fresh light on the controversy over who actually owns the ancient remains of long-dead Americans.
"My research could have implications for the ancient burial rights of North American Indians because it's quite possible that dolichocephalic man existed in North America well before the native Indians," she said. But even more controversial is the suggestion that Peñon woman could be a descendant of Stone Age Europeans who had crossed the ice-fringed Atlantic some 15,000 or 20,000 years ago.
...
Why isn't this new information being discussed widespread on the evening news, or in colleges and universities?
It would destroy the current thinking that "native" American Indians were 1) First here and 2) had "their" land taken from them.
It looks like it's turning out to be the other way around! Europeans were here FIRST, on the east coast...then migrated west and eventually were either absorbed into the greater numbers coming here from asia LATER on, killed off outright or died out due to the increased compitition for food/resources.
The object of the exercise, and the reason we object to illegal aliens, is to AVOID being displaced by the invading barbarians, aka, “immigrants.”
Unfortunately, just like the landowners of ancient Rome, business that be seek cheap labor in these invader, despite the threat the represent. And Democrats and RINOs (like Rubio) seek to accommodate them for political gain.
” I ain’t from Africa. I’m from St. Louis.”.....Fred Sanford
