Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Remembering Robert E. Lee and Stonewall Jackson
Canada Free Press ^ | January 19, 2013 | Calvin E. Johnson, Jr.

Posted on 01/19/2013 2:20:42 PM PST by BigReb555

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-83 last
To: rockrr
Legally the Emancipation Proclamation could only apply to the states in rebellion. Federal emancipation came with the 13th Amendment. I thought you knew that.

Passed by Congress on January 31, 1865, and ratified on December 6, 1865, the 13th amendment abolished slavery in the United States Lincoln issued the Emancipation Proclamation on January 1, 1863, As it turns out the Emancipation Proclamation was almost two years before the 13th amendment. It is obvious you did not know this!!! Insert snarky comment of your choice here__________!!

81 posted on 01/21/2013 1:28:29 PM PST by ontap
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: ontap

Wow, you really got me there pardner (rolls-eyes).

Thanks to a nifty little gadget called the Internet one (if suitably inclined) can look up all sorts of stuff. There’s a fairly concise page at wackypedia that will tell you all about the EP: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emancipation_Proclamation

Like the fact that Lincoln issued his preliminary Proclamation (an announcement that he was going to issued the EP if the rebel states didn’t cease & desist) on September 22, 1862. So it was more like three years.

You’ll notice that it deliberately didn’t apply to the five slave states not in rebellion (Delaware, Kentucky, Maryland, Missouri, and West Virginia) in addition to northern states.

What it doesn’t mention is that it wasn’t the only proposed Thirteenth Amendment. The original one was proposed on March 2, 1861 by Thomas Corwin (it came to be known as the Corwin Amendment. This one was essentially the opposite of the eventual Thirteenth Amendment that we have today. It proposed to “forbid subsequent attempts to amend the Constitution to empower the Congress to “abolish or interfere” with the “domestic institutions” of the states, including “persons held to labor or service” - effectively perpetuating slavery for alltime. The south rejected it (well, what was left of southern representatives in Congress by that time).

Of course I’m not telling you anything new...


82 posted on 01/21/2013 2:10:04 PM PST by rockrr (Everything is different now...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: rockrr

To be completely honest I myself have posted “less than intelligent remarks” and lived to have them blow up in my face. We are not going to agree to much on this subject but the fun is in the chase. I doff my hat to you sir and thank you for your spirited exchange. I will now recede to my recliner and a mint julep!!!


83 posted on 01/21/2013 2:20:56 PM PST by ontap
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-83 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson