Posted on 12/06/2012 10:45:39 AM PST by Sub-Driver
Queen Nan, please STFU!!
Yes, Nan is a madam... she is the madam of a house of prostitution!!
Isn’t it time for a house to fall out of the sky and onto this woman?
I was rather hoping it would be a septic tank truck.
She’s probably heading back to the Big Island of Hawaii for her “festivus” break. I hope she receives a warm welcome...from an active volcano.
So many politicians (and “journalists”, and others) in fairly recent years have been “useful tools” in the relentless march to World Government - Strobe Talbott and his buddies, the ubiquitous Clintons, Susan Rice (feeding at the trough for a long time), Barack Hussein Obama, Walter Concrete, and many others. - They claim it’s for “the world” and intended to avert war; the very thing it will eventually facilitate. - The Constitution stands in their way and has, up to now, slowed them down; thank God. - Now I am at the point where I say, “Maranatha!” He’s the only one who is fit to govern mankind; but anyone paying attention dreads the Antichrist and his threatening mark which must come first. May the Lord deliver us!
No, Hart-Celler was by far the worst piece of legislation ever passed IMHO.
I have a disability (one arm)...talk for your self Nance you f..ing @##@!
“... GOP...if Nancy resigned tomorrow, would form a conga line to opine what a great person and representative of America she was.”
How true and how depressing.
Okay. Now I have to look up and see who the sick Republican scumbags were who voted FOR this atrocity.
I'll be back.
So, lets see if I understand this correctly.
There was a proposed treaty that would commit the US to doing ... exactly what it is already doing (under the ADA).
The difference being that the treaty would make the US subject to oversight and possibly intervention by international bodies, supplanting (or maybe the right word is superseding) the oversight already being done by the Judicial Branch of the US Government and various Executive Branch agencies and Congressional Committees.
Yup, that’s a sovereignty issue alright. No if-ands-buts about it. It’s a shame that Senator Dole came out in support of it. I know he was called “the tax collector for the welfare state”, but he did seem to usually take a pretty strong line against infringement of US sovereignty by the international community.
The usual scumbags, for the most part. I am not too familiar with Ayotte and Barasso... Are they always simpletons?
Nancy, please explain the Constitutional authority that empowers the Congress to even consider such legislation. Include footnotes and Supreme Court decisions as appropriate.
Or is this just more emotionally-based government expansion?
Pelosi, We'll throw a party when you leave, you old battle-axe.
It was voted down in a 61-38 vote
Seems to me that a few Democrats voted against it too...
LOL!
Umm.. No.
That's 61 "ayes" and 31 "nays". A treaty needs 66 "ayes". Every rat voted FOR it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.