Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

GOP Considers 'Doomsday' Fiscal Cliff Plan ("Becoming The Most Likely Scenario")
Newser ^ | Dec 3, 2012 12:54 PM CST | Kevin Spak, Newser Staff

Posted on 12/03/2012 12:53:06 PM PST by Red Steel

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-48 last
To: I cannot think of a name
"voted out?"
the "(non)-boner" was re-affirmed as Speaker in late Nov.
before the new GOP house members are seated. :-( grrrrrr.

41 posted on 12/03/2012 5:53:27 PM PST by skinkinthegrass (Anger a Conservative by telling a lie; Anger a Liberal by telling the truth....RWR 8-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel
How is giving Obama WHAT HE WANTS a plan!?! Extending the "middle class tax cuts" without extending the tax cuts FOR THOSE WHO EMPLOY THE MIDDLE CLASS is exactly what Obama has wanted all along!

HOW IS CAVING A "PLAN"!?!

(...and this is the point where I stop typing before I get banned or accused of having Tourette's.)

42 posted on 12/03/2012 6:49:16 PM PST by Redcloak (Winter is coming.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

Boehner has shown no ability or willingness to fight the traitorous Lib press. They will crucify him and the Repubs and Obama’s 80-IQ goons will cheer them on.


43 posted on 12/03/2012 7:49:33 PM PST by pabianice (washington, dc ..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

Hey Republicans,

This isn’t complicated. Say ‘No’!


44 posted on 12/04/2012 12:56:38 AM PST by Dragonspirit (Always remember President Token won only by defecting on his CFR pledge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: what's up

“The elderly are not touched.”

The elderly have been creamed by the Bernanke, Bush II, Obama policies of using the Federal Reserve to artificially suppress interest rates in order to hold down the interest rate on the ballooning federal deficit. The self reliant retiree who could earn 6% on a safe, federally insured CD ladder at the beginning of the Bush II regime in 2001, now earns 1%. Or, had that same retiree invested in a conservative diversified portfolio of stock mutual funds in 2001, that retiree would have lost 50% of the savings in the 2008 market crash.

Whichever path the retiree took to invest savings in the private sector over the past decade, the real after tax and inflation return on savings was negative. A negative return on savings over a decade is not going to encourage people to be frugal nor will it give them faith in the private sector options for conservative savings. For many of the elderly, who paid into Social Security for 40 years and did accumulate enough savings for a self sufficient retirement the last decade has moved them from a comfortable middle class lifestyle to poverty. Add to that the bailouts of Wall Street speculators by the government, and the government shoveling money and free phones at third generation non working urban parasites and you call the elderly greedy?


45 posted on 12/04/2012 2:06:12 AM PST by Soul of the South
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Soul of the South
I was referring primarily to a poster's comment that the elderly's entitlements were the first to get cut.

I pointed out that the elderly won't be touched by such cuts; the reforms are only directed at those under 55.

I didn't comment on the interest rate realities. Only the entitlements. There's no denying that a major portion of entitlements (social security, Medicare) are retirement programs.

46 posted on 12/04/2012 11:30:34 AM PST by what's up
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: what's up

I don’t know how old you are, but I do know how old I am. I first started putting $$$ into the Social Security and Medicare funds when I was only 15.

I put in plenty of money for over 50 years.

I paid my income taxes—as a single person for all but 4 years of all those tax returns. I was in the higher category—not married—no kids, etc. Earn $3 to bring home $2, was the mantra.

I haven’t used one single penny of Medicare.

I was promised my Social Security benefits and I live now on less than $1100 a month.

Reducing that money to people like myself is out and out fraud. I paid what was demanded into the fund. I didn’t steal the money out of the fund—the Democrats did.


47 posted on 12/04/2012 11:36:36 AM PST by ridesthemiles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: ridesthemiles
I'm 51 so I'm in the "limbo" zone (not young enough to plan again for retirement...not old enough to get all benefits).

Yet I still want Medicare reformed because if they don't do it it will go bankrupt for EVERYONE.

I'm OK with the voucher proposed by Ryan. I like the idea of being free to shop around for healthcare.

I don't know why you're worried about SS benefits. You will get those.

48 posted on 12/04/2012 12:31:19 PM PST by what's up
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-48 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson