Posted on 11/12/2012 10:34:28 AM PST by the_Watchman
Defense bill repeals military law on sodomy...
WASHINGTON (AP) – Recently passed Senate legislation would make sodomy and sex with animals legal under military law, ending long-standing prohibitions and triggering cries of perversion from conservative groups.
http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/news/washington/story/2011-12-08/us-defense-bill-sodomy/51753518/1
The photos displayed seems to portrait some cosiness when he was in uniform. The subject is a sticking point not only for a military prosecution but also for perjury???
Thanks for the link.
Sex with animals?!?
Yes they can prosecute former military- retired or other separation designations if it is determined that the violations occurred while still on active duty. The military can and has yanked people back in to face prosecution. It is not common and I seriously doubt it would happen here but it is absolutely possible.
If the crime occurred while he was on active duty, he could be subject to recall and UCMJ prosecution. To prove adultery, you need a very high burden of proof (something on par with a notarized sex tape with three witnesses for adultery), and a willing prosecutor. Once that burden is met however, the charges get piled on (conduct unbecoming of a commissioned officer, failure to obey an order not to get it on while deployed, poor command climate, etc...)
By this point, Patraeus has certainly gotten the council of legal experts, and having his depth and breadth of experience in the legally careful world of the general officer corps, he’s not going to do anything accidentally to make the case against him any stronger.
Oh jeese, you missed the dumbest guy on Earth, The Governor from South Carolina Mark Sanford and of course Senator Larry Craig....we could go on forever naming names.
Haha, very good!
No offense, but I think you’re wrong.
I believe that the specificity of Petraeus’ resignation statement last week was a declaration of independence from the blackmail the O thugs were using to keep him in line.
He could have easily resigned “for personal reasons” or “to spend more time with his family” or some other generic reason. Why admit to adultery, thus exposing his wife and children to ridicule, unless he’s specifically removing the blackmail ammo they were using to keep him quiet?
http://www.stripes.com/news/panel-urges-ending-ucmj-s-sodomy-ban-1.95937
Well it USED to be Article 125. They did away with it. I can’t imagine how many times it was used anyway. Basically having sodomy with your wife could land you in jail...
I assume it would usually be for serious violations, like theft or security issues.
Never trust an officer who stays on active duty to work for a liberal president. NEVER. Patriotism has nothing to do with it. It’s an ego trip. Any one with a sense of decency will be no part of a presidential administration that is hostile to the military and wants to cut the force. Never forget the worthless Robert Gates, who was Bush’s second Sec of Defense.
Flags should have went up with this character when he decided to stay on as Obama’s Sec of Defense. He showed his true liberal colors when he was the main driving force in allowing sodomites in the US military. He advocated for lifting DADT. Bush was a RINO, who appointed as many liberals as he did conservatives. The absolute worst being the worthless John Roberts, with a close second Robert Gates.
Why admit to adultery, thus exposing his wife and children to ridicule,
Ridicule? I think they are looked upon with pity. I bet the wife stays with him.
True, no oral...that’s some BS!
I was only an E-4, but I’m so glad I got out. Homos, Muslim sensitivity training, and assorted other BS. It seems all Generals are highly political nowadays.
...but only in exchange for his silence/cooperation on...what?
(whats that? sure smells like blackmail to me)
The "affair" didn't happen until after he was retired.
I probably should have said “embarrassment.”
The point remains. By admitting adultery, he removed the leverage others may have been holding over him.
Unless, of course, there’s more we don’t yet know.
I seriously doubt that. He may have been an adulterer but he has served his country with honor and will likely continue to comply with every request made of him by the U.S. and Congress.......
As for Martha's statement: "possibly face military prosecution for adultery "
More mud slinging against the proverbial wall in order perpetuate and continue the controversy....
The chances of the military charging Petraeus with adultery after he has left service are worse than slim to none. Even in the case of adultery while still in service, it is extremely difficult to prove absent pictures or personal confession.
IIRC, Petraeus has put no timeline on his alleged adultery. Additionally, it is also impossible, if he recanted his confession, to prove beyond his own word. He didn’t confess under oath, and he could always say there were politically expedient, personal, psychological, etc., reasons that he said what he said and then recant his confession.
The military is not going to charge him. He did this purely to help Obama with the Benghazi case.
For the FBI to say they found out about “adultery” would require them to prove penetration. I’m betting they can’t do that, and that the military wouldn’t pursue such a thing without rock solid proof.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.