Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 11/12/2012 9:40:31 AM PST by chessplayer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-28 last
To: chessplayer
Lincoln did not get even 40% of the popular vote in 1860.

If the Democratic vote had not split three ways, Lincoln might have lost.

 Party  Candidate  Percentage  Electoral Vote
 Republican  Lincoln  39.6%  180
 Democratic  Douglas  29.5%  72
 Southern Democrat  Breckenridge  18.2%  39
 Constitutional Union  Bell  12.6%  12
 Other  ----  0.1%  0

32 posted on 11/12/2012 10:52:40 AM PST by reg45 (Barack 0bama: Implementing class warfare by having no class.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: chessplayer

re: “MSNBC’s Chris Jansing: ‘Parallels’ Between Lincoln and Reelected Obama are ‘Fascinating’”

I think we should complete the connection and work to get all the red states to secede from the union.

Beyond both being from Illinois and this “country divided” thing, there is no comparison between Lincoln and Obama.

First, it was Lincoln’s commitment to block slavery from expanding into the territories that fueled the Southern leadership’s step into actual secession. Obama wants to expand abortion, same-sex marriage, debt, etc.

Lincoln opposed the split-up between the North and the South. Obama encourages class warfare and dividing the nation into as many groups as possible.

Lincoln did not oppose the 2nd amendment, he did not encourage the U. S. to abide by foreign law, he did not try to limit religious freedom, he did not try to force all Americans to purchase a particular product, and he did not take world tours and apologize for America’s actions or success.

Lincoln, whether you agree with him or not, carried the civil war to a conclusion with victory, while Obama is intentionally and systematically putting America at a military and political disadvantage and surrendering our initiative in both areas with all our enemies.

Lincoln’s motive for pursuing the war, right or wrong, was to save the union, while Obama seems to be intentionally trying to destroy it.

Lincoln visited the wounded soldiers on both sides (Union and Confederate) every day to express concern for them, their families, and their eventually healing. I doubt seriously that Obama has ever visited our wounded soldiers outside of an occasional photo-op.

Again, rightly or wrongly, Lincoln allowed his generals and soldiers to do whatever they needed to do to end the war as quickly as possible, while Obama demonstrates that he cares very little for our soldiers in the field with his outrageous ROE imposed on them, and cuts to our military infrastructure and preparedness.

I’m sure there are other vast differences between the two, but these came to mind very quickly.


33 posted on 11/12/2012 10:52:41 AM PST by rusty schucklefurd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: chessplayer
"...You have a president who is newly elected, who faces a divided country and a divided Congress and a divided country."

Yes, but does he face a divided country also? /redundancy

35 posted on 11/12/2012 10:57:55 AM PST by Cvengr (Adversity in life and death is inevitable. Thru faith in Christ, stress is optional.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: chessplayer

This actress supports Eugenics, her president supports eugenics, yet he is somehow comparable to Lincoln? Phhhhttttt...

Morons selling shinola to morons.


38 posted on 11/12/2012 11:41:31 AM PST by CSM (Keeper of the Dave Ramsey Ping list. FReepmail me if you want your beeber stuned.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: chessplayer
Who knew that Mary Todd Lincoln ate Wago beef and went on long trips and vacations, while Mr. Lincoln played 18 holes. All at tax payers expense. S/ The only thing O has in common with Lincoln is that if he keeps up his crap, he just might get a civil war started.
39 posted on 11/12/2012 12:24:40 PM PST by JimC214
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: chessplayer

Lincoln only lived for a month and ten days after his 2nd inauguration.


40 posted on 11/12/2012 12:39:54 PM PST by beelzepug ("Why bother creating wealth when you can just redistribute it?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: chessplayer

Here is a parallel between Lincoln and Obama...secession. States will be leaving the union I predict when Obamacare is being forced down the throats.


50 posted on 11/12/2012 2:24:48 PM PST by Mozilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-28 last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson