If you don't want a child, don't have sex. It is not my responsibility to pay for you birth control, your abortion, or your unwanted child. Only adults should be having sex and adults should be responsible for themselves, not me and not the government. It would be fine if it were between you and your insurance company but the government has to get involved and demand what I have to do. That's my problem.
Of course Fluck could be lying. She may not need birth control assistance from the federales because she can't find anyone to exploit HER!
Georgetown law student! This is why you should quit electing lawyers. Can’t even figure out how to have sex without the government being involved. And down the line after all this yappin she’ll turn out to be a lesbian.
Sandra has intellectual arguments without a moral foundation, hence, baseless.
There is an acquaintance that I frequently email, at least used to, that a few months back said to me, “You can’t legislate a woman’s vagina!”, to which I simply replied, “It’s murder”.
He was obviously spoon fed his position on abortion at an intellectual level, but, when I hit him with the moral implications, he was stone cold quiet.
Intellect, reason, without a moral foundation is akin to a ship without a rudder, floundering.
Intellectuals, if I’m not simply listening and accepting their superior reason, find me worthless....a useless eater.
Ingratiating myself to them is an empty path.
The grace of God ensures my separation from their darkness.
I am very grateful to the only wise God for this.
Here’s my big beef with the women’s activists who have adopted “choice” as the key word in their political mantra.
The problem with their choice is the choices that are not any big priority for them.
Chosing to not engage in sexual intercourse when you are not married is not a priorty.
Chosing to not engage in sexual intercourse with a partner with whom there is no mutual committment to marriage is not a priority.
Chosing to use contraceptive means if engaging in sexual intercourse with a partner with whom there is no mutual committment to marriage is not a priority.
Chosing to raise a child conceived out of wedlock is not a priority.
Having an abortion escapes the need to make all the other choices that could have been made, and is the priority.
The “woman’s ‘right’ to chose” is reduced to a ‘right’ to one choice - abortion.
The fact is that a woman has “the right” to make all the other choices that would preclude getting an abortion, but the womens’ movement thinks so little of those choices as responsible choices they are not that movements’ priority.