That is insane! A year before IPO? Are they kidding or just idiots!?
So is she arguing that, if the shares were undervalued, she should have gotten fewer of them? Did anyone force her to sell the shares before the IPO? Also, an entire year before the IPO, it might be difficult for an insider to say how well the shares would be sold at. Did the Facebook guy foresee how poorly his IPO would go?
Hey...Trump should give the 5 mil to this ex-wife if Obama releases his school records
So this move by Allred frames the fact that Romney is a financial expert. Nice going, Gloria!
I’m having trouble here - her payoff was in shares of stock. They say Mitt undervalued them so she got 500K shares. If he had guessed right, would she have only gotten 50K shares? She got a percentage of the company and had the luxury of deciding whether she thought her ex was a good businessman or inept - she chose inept and she was married to the schlubb - Mitt was only friends....
This is SOOOOOO stupid.
The divorcee` gets 4 million (that she blows on lawyers to try to get more money) and gets half a million shares of stock, which she turns around and sells.
Then tries to claim 20+ years later that Romney had something to so with the stock being 'undervalued'?
LOL! OF COURSE the value of the price was low on the Staples stock compared to a year later....the company hadn't gone public yet!
But it takes her over TWO DECADES to bring it up!
Can anyone say 'liberal tool'? LOL!
Staples was a turn-around, i.e., on the verge of bankruptcy (stock worth zero), so what’s the big deal?????
“In my opinion, that’s a good price to sell the securities at,” Romney ... testified.
Oh my goodness! Not only did Romney offer an opinion on the price of the stock that this woman sold prematurely, but he ended a sentence with a preposition!!!!
Oh, stop the presses! This man is not fit to wash Obama's shorts, much less take his job! Where's Matthews on this?