Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Two Missouri Senate Polls -- first poll : Akin +4, second poll McCaskill +1
RCP ^

Posted on 10/02/2012 7:40:02 PM PDT by Arthurio

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-71 last
To: Evil Slayer
I agree with katiedidit1, you are a VERY negative poster.

Not as negative as some. Not as blind to facts as others.

Do you know anything about Missouri?

More than I ever wanted to.

Romney will carry Missouri

I don't doubt that at all. That doesn't mean Akin is a shoe-in.

The next polls coming out will not only show Romney taking a huge lead in Missouri but Akin jumping in the lead "big time" over McCaskill (who is just a clone of Obama).

The 'next polls' came out yesterday showing McCaskill up by 6.

61 posted on 10/04/2012 9:12:38 AM PDT by Delhi Rebels (There was a row in Silver Street - the regiments was out.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Delhi Rebels
The 'next polls' came out yesterday showing McCaskill up by 6.

Source???

RCP Average 9/16 - 10/3 (has not changed yet)

I am not interested with Rasmussen Reports or PPP (D)* which was averaged into the WeAskAmerica and the Gravis Marketing polls that gave Akin a +2.3. This article source that the original thread links to is what I want and it hasn't been updated yet. It's the RCP Average, stupid.

Try getting the RCP Average for 10/4 that this thread was created from and then we'll talk. Otherwise, butt out.

Bty, you still haven't got a clue about Rasmussen and their clone polls ginning up the count for McCaskill yet have you. Go back to Ireland and leave us alone.

62 posted on 10/04/2012 9:44:50 AM PDT by Evil Slayer (Onward, Christian soldiers, marching as to war....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Evil Slayer
Source???

RCP. Those numbers next to the poll results? Those are dates. The PPP and Rasmussen figures were posted yesterday.

I am not interested with Rasmussen Reports or PPP (D)* which was averaged into the WeAskAmerica and the Gravis Marketing polls that gave Akin a +2.3.

Of course you're not.

Try getting the RCP Average for 10/4 that this thread was created from and then we'll talk. Otherwise, butt out.

Sorry. I'm here to stay.

Bty, you still haven't got a clue about Rasmussen and their clone polls ginning up the count for McCaskill yet have you.

Of course they are.

63 posted on 10/04/2012 11:07:24 AM PDT by Delhi Rebels (There was a row in Silver Street - the regiments was out.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Delhi Rebels; Evil Slayer

As for being around..the owner of this forum frowned on trolls that intend to promote liberals. Zotting is not uncommon in such instances.


64 posted on 10/05/2012 12:24:39 PM PDT by katiedidit1 (Constitutionalist..period)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: katiedidit1
As for being around..the owner of this forum frowned on trolls that intend to promote liberals.

Did he also appoint you to be Grand High Detector of Trolls as well? Or are you just trying to tell him how to run his forum?

Pointing out the problems Akin is having is being realistic. It doesn't mean I promoting McCaskill. Akin is at a severe disadvantage on fundraising. He is where he is solely do to his own actions and misstatements. He may well lose the election because of that. None of that is anything but the truth. From a winning-the-election stand point he was the weakest of the three candidates who ran. All those statements are just pointing out the obvious and not a promotion of McCaskill or any other liberal. In fact I'd appreciate it if you could point out where I've said a single positive thing about her.

What you want to do is stick your fingers in your ears and la-la-la away anyone who dares point out inconvenient facts to you. How will that win the election?

65 posted on 10/05/2012 1:22:38 PM PDT by Delhi Rebels (There was a row in Silver Street - the regiments was out.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Delhi Rebels; Evil Slayer
I know he does not approve of trolls that bash conservatives and defend abortionists. He would not have won the MO primary if he was the weakest candidate would he? the Missouri election is between Akin who is a true conservative and McCaskill who is a leftwinger that supports the Obama agenda. NOONE else is running. YOU do not live in MO and you do not know much about the states politics yet you continue to present and attempt to degrade Akin over a 6 second gaffe which does make McCaskill appear better. NOT a good move when we are fighting to get conservative elected. Akin has the support of Perry, Gingrich, Santorum, Huckabee, Coburn, Demint, Schlafly, JC Watts, Inhoufe, Bauer and the MO Farm Bureau.
YOU are an anti Akin troll and that is a fact which means you are promoting McCaskill.
66 posted on 10/05/2012 4:06:02 PM PDT by katiedidit1 (Constitutionalist..period)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Delhi Rebels; Evil Slayer

Akin voted against Obamacare..Claire voted for it; Akin voted against the 700 billion dollar cut to Medicare while Claire voted for it; Akin voted against the Wall Stree Bailout while Claire voted for it; McCaskill voted to raise taxes 50 times. She has to go!

67 posted on 10/05/2012 4:58:00 PM PDT by katiedidit1 (Constitutionalist..period)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Delhi Rebels; katiedidit1

This is your first warning. You are new here and since you are new, I am giving you time to THINK about the consequences of what happens when you go over the line with Jim's guidelines pertaining to baiting a fellow FReeper. You can't fool Jim by the way you are constantly attacking a fellow FReeper who is defending a CONSERVATIVE candidate who is running for the second most important position in this election. This is a life or death situation for this country and you are intent on harassing katiedidit1. I know her personally and she has been a dedicated conservative FReeper for over 8 years compared to your 2 months.

Back off, NOW. My next post will be going directly to Jim Robinson if you continue your deception of being Akin friendly but REALLY supporting a LIBERAL Obama clone named McCaskill by giving her free advertisement in your posts. You are not kidding anyone with these kinds of tactics. I can see right through them. So can Jim.

You owe katiedidit1 an apology for calling her names like you did in your post 65. Your reputation on this board has been noted for doing these kind of things by many others.

And, if I get another reply from you like the ones you have been sending me again, you can bet your Irish BS, Jim will be my next contact.

ES

68 posted on 10/05/2012 6:13:58 PM PDT by Evil Slayer ((Onward, Christian soldiers, marching as to war....))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Evil Slayer
This is your first warning.

How many do I get?

You owe katiedidit1 an apology for calling her names like you did in your post 65.

I disagree so I'm afraid no apology will be forthcoming.

69 posted on 10/05/2012 7:15:25 PM PDT by Delhi Rebels (There was a row in Silver Street - the regiments was out.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: Delhi Rebels
How many do I get?

None! Apparently you didn't read my post, especially the last paragraph.

I disagree so I'm afraid no apology will be forthcoming.

BIG mistake!

70 posted on 10/05/2012 7:26:08 PM PDT by Evil Slayer ((Onward, Christian soldiers, marching as to war....))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: Evil Slayer

ES, I don’t think Irish has a clue as to how important the MO senate race is for not only Missouri but for America. The difference between a radical leftwing liberal and a conservative is stark. It is either McCaskill or Akin..that is it and YES Akin can win.
If you are not for Todd Akin you are for McCaskill..period.


71 posted on 10/06/2012 7:43:07 AM PDT by katiedidit1 (Constitutionalist..period)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-71 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson