Skip to comments.
China's First Carrier Pointed At Japan Over Senkakus
IBD EDITORIALS ^
| September 27, 2012
Posted on 09/27/2012 1:09:09 PM PDT by raptor22
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-27 next last
1
posted on
09/27/2012 1:09:13 PM PDT
by
raptor22
To: Jeff Head
To: raptor22
3
posted on
09/27/2012 1:16:56 PM PDT
by
b4its2late
(A Liberal is a person who will give away everything he doesn't own.)
To: raptor22
4
posted on
09/27/2012 1:19:44 PM PDT
by
Emperor Palpatine
("On the ascent of Olympus, what's a botched bar or two?" -Artur Schnabel)
To: raptor22
I certainly hope the Chi-coms have perfected the carrier battle group, otherwise their brand spankin new carrier will be tilting toward the sky as she sinks to the bottom of the ocean.
To: raptor22
That aircarft carrier is a threat to no one but her crew.
6
posted on
09/27/2012 1:22:37 PM PDT
by
MeganC
(January 20, 2013: The end of an error.)
To: raptor22
Don’t worry we back our allies!!
Errr.....
...Well, err, we used to back our allies. Now the leader of the current regime just bows to our enemies and our allies enemies.
7
posted on
09/27/2012 1:23:01 PM PDT
by
Vaquero
(Don't pick a fight with an old guy. If he is too old to fight, he'll just kill you.)
To: raptor22
Er ... Senkakus isn’t the son of Porkulus and grandson of Stimulus?
8
posted on
09/27/2012 1:24:37 PM PDT
by
x
To: servantboy777
Dont count on that happening You are thinking of our LAST commander in chief.
9
posted on
09/27/2012 1:25:21 PM PDT
by
Vaquero
(Don't pick a fight with an old guy. If he is too old to fight, he'll just kill you.)
To: raptor22
What are they threatening to do, run it aground? Unless its being manned by Russians, it takes decades to master carrier operations from what understand.
10
posted on
09/27/2012 1:40:26 PM PDT
by
andyk
(I have sworn...eternal hostility against every form of tyranny over the mind of man.)
To: raptor22
If Chinese plastic is an indicator, I wouldn’t put too much faith in that Carrier, every glass or item in my home with Chinese plastic is fractured with hairline cracks, our politicians have replaced American and Japanese products with inferior junk, thanks Washington!
11
posted on
09/27/2012 1:49:20 PM PDT
by
IslamE
(epiphany)
To: raptor22
The issue of the Senkaku Islands has been bubbling away for 30 years but ONLY NOW does it bubble up fiercely.
It’s clearly designed to distract from some huge other (still) secret thing, which is probably a Mount Everest of DEBT.
12
posted on
09/27/2012 1:49:48 PM PDT
by
gaijin
To: raptor22; Travis McGee; Jeff Head
Until it gets aircraft its just a really wide cruiser
13
posted on
09/27/2012 1:50:24 PM PDT
by
GeronL
(http://asspos.blogspot.com)
To: MeganC
"That aircarft carrier is a threat to no one but her crew."
It might make a great fish reef too. ;-)
14
posted on
09/27/2012 2:24:13 PM PDT
by
Average Al
(The Democrat party is a free range zoo.)
To: Average Al
"That aircarft carrier is a threat to no one but her crew." An ex-navy relative of mine messaged me that his still active Navy Buddies wish to thank the Chi-coms for making a nice juicy live-fire target. They feel there is not much to shoot at now Russia's Military has been so decimated. (He tells me Russia is scuttling more ships then they are building these days.)
15
posted on
09/27/2012 2:29:28 PM PDT
by
Mad Dawgg
(If you're going to deny my 1st Amendment rights then I must proceed to the 2nd one...)
To: GeronL
And apparently there are no aircraft capable of landing on a carrier. Not to mention pilots able to do so once there are. It’s for prestige, mostly.
Are these the same islands that Japan just bought back from private owners? That might have been the reason.
To: Mad Dawgg
it is a navy cross waiting to happen.
also, I think they pulled the SSMs off it so it is not enen a really big cruiser right now.
17
posted on
09/27/2012 2:36:35 PM PDT
by
redlegplanner
( No Representation without Taxation)
To: Mad Dawgg
"(He tells me Russia is scuttling more ships then they are building these days.)"
Are you sure they aren't just rusting and sinking in port? ;-)
18
posted on
09/27/2012 3:05:32 PM PDT
by
Average Al
(The Democrat party is a free range zoo.)
To: raptor22
“They also have significant oil deposits vital to a China scouring the world for energy for its growing economy.”
I say, it looks like Red China is acting the way Imperial Japan did in the years leading up to Pearl Harbor.
19
posted on
09/27/2012 5:45:19 PM PDT
by
Sola Veritas
(Trying to speak truth - not always with the best grammar or spelling)
To: raptor22
The
new Chinese Carrier will not figure into this dispute at all for at least two, and probably closr to four years. They do not have the aircraft ready for it yet and will not have a full squadron ready for anouer 18-24 months...then they have to train.
So, right now, she will not come near such a disputed, potential combat area. she would be nothing but a big fat target.
20
posted on
09/27/2012 10:16:33 PM PDT
by
Jeff Head
( Freedom is not free, never has been, never will be (www.dragonsfuryseries.com))
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-27 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson