Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bill Nye the Science Guy says creationism not good for kids
Reuters ^ | August 28, 2012 | Lily Kuo

Posted on 08/28/2012 3:39:34 AM PDT by rickmichaels

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 321-329 next last
To: Mom MD

LOL!!!


81 posted on 09/01/2012 4:29:47 PM PDT by metmom (For freedom Christ has set us free; stand firm therefore & do not submit again to a yoke of slavery)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Third Person
I would bet, that as a whole, children who are taught Creationism are also taught the theory of evolution. It would be interesting to see the test scores [relative to the theory of evolution] of children with a knowledge of Creationism vs. those without.

My kids were all taught about evolution because it's out there and they would encounter it.

And they're all creationists and this is out of an engineer and two physics majors. And they have a really good handle scientifically on WHY evolution cannot work.

82 posted on 09/01/2012 4:34:26 PM PDT by metmom (For freedom Christ has set us free; stand firm therefore & do not submit again to a yoke of slavery)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Paradox
I still dont care for Creationism to be taught in public schools, though it probably deserves a mention.

Then keep evolution out. Why should one parties creation account have precedence over any others?

83 posted on 09/01/2012 4:36:19 PM PDT by metmom (For freedom Christ has set us free; stand firm therefore & do not submit again to a yoke of slavery)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: MrB; chaos_5
And obviously any society based on such nonsense would have the intent and result of subjugating the masses, and subjugating women, and with oppressing everyone under their power, right?

Well, sure, MrB. Dontcha know what a mess this country was until the atheistic liberals came along at the end of the last century to straighten out the mess the Founding Fathers made of the US?

84 posted on 09/01/2012 4:40:15 PM PDT by metmom (For freedom Christ has set us free; stand firm therefore & do not submit again to a yoke of slavery)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: chaos_5; MrB
The last time I picked up a King James Bible it wasn’t even written in modern English.

You didn't really just say that, did you?

God help us if there are more people like you in positions of power in this country. We're in worse shape than I thought if that's the case.

85 posted on 09/01/2012 4:42:37 PM PDT by metmom (For freedom Christ has set us free; stand firm therefore & do not submit again to a yoke of slavery)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Paradox
I still dont care for Creationism to be taught in public schools

Why not?

86 posted on 09/01/2012 4:46:27 PM PDT by Future Snake Eater (CrossFit.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: rickmichaels

What about the “scientifically literate” people that reject evolution and - gasp! - believe in creationism?

Oh, yes. I remember now. They lose their teaching or research jobs and prestige schools try to revoke their credentials. I guess creationism must be like a disease that the herd must be isolated from or it will spread.


87 posted on 09/01/2012 5:07:38 PM PDT by WorkingClassFilth (I'm for Churchill in 1940!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pieceofthepuzzle
[N]o one who is intellectually honest and sufficiently thoughtful would be smug about what we know, and what we understand scientifically.

I agree wholeheartedly.

For both theories, one eventually makes a leap of faith or relies on faith. For Christians, the options do not include evolution since our Lord spoke of literal creationism and it is taught it throughout the Word. Co-opting the language and historic revisionism on behalf of 'evolving' thought is hardly the infallible, inspired and inerrant faith that Christians hold as solid rock.
88 posted on 09/01/2012 5:14:47 PM PDT by WorkingClassFilth (I'm for Churchill in 1940!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Mom MD

Yes. Ignorant people like you ought to be locked up and kept away from the enlightened masses pouring from the public education system where truth is taught daily and in great detail. Our present society owes a great deal to clear thinking evolutionary thought and we can all look forward to a brighter tomorrow once folks like you are culled from the herd.


89 posted on 09/01/2012 5:21:11 PM PDT by WorkingClassFilth (I'm for Churchill in 1940!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: metmom

BINGO!

BTW, I congratulate you on producing such fine scientific illiterates.


90 posted on 09/01/2012 5:32:25 PM PDT by WorkingClassFilth (I'm for Churchill in 1940!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: Lonesome in Massachussets
Indeed, Galileo did not understand everything; not many of us (YT included) do... But, do you really think that Copernican mathematics are used for maneuvering Cassini around Saturn and its moons?
91 posted on 09/01/2012 6:12:43 PM PDT by TXnMA ("Allah": Satan's current alias...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: TXnMA

Um, no. Neither were Galilean mathematics. Galileo made it point to belittle and insult his indulgent patron over about a matter which he clearly did not understand. Galileo was not a mathematical astronomer. I truly believe that without the Vatican trial, Galileo would be a minor figure in the history of science, inferior probably to Edmund Halley or even Robert Hook.


92 posted on 09/01/2012 6:36:02 PM PDT by Lonesome in Massachussets (The Democratic Party strongly supports full civil rights for necro-Americans!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: metmom
What Nye, and other atheistic evolution pushers, seem to not grasp is that the greatest scientific progress was made in this country at a time BEFORE evolution was in the picture.

If it’s true that belief in creationism hinders scientific advance and progress, then any scientific progress should not have even been possible before Darwin proposed his theory.

The fact that it did gives lie to the claim they make that creationism harms scientific advance and will send us back into the Dark Ages.

You know perfectly well that it is highly unlikely that I'm going to embrace any anti-science, no matter how strongly some people feel that to accept the scientific view is to reject Jesus and the promise of redemption. So why do you ping me to this?

As to the "greatest scientific progress" made in this country, I think that's a matter of opinion. Personally, I think the greatest advances have been in medicine, where people live longer, healthier lives than ever before. Women no longer commonly die from childbirth; people no longer have to have ten children in the hopes that a couple will live to adulthood. None of these medical advances would have been possible without the theoretical framework of evolution showing us how all life is related, so that we can do the research. Darwin, of course, did not invent evolution; he was, like many others, an observer of it. He didn't even formulate the first or only theory to try to explain evolution; his theory was the best one at the time, in that it allowed for scientists to make testable predictions that were borne out experimentally.

A person who believes that the stories in Genesis are literal accounts simply cannot be a scientist. The only way someone can maintain their belief that the earth is flat, the sun orbits the earth, the stars are fixed in some sort of solid shell, and that plants and animals sprang forth from the dirt fully formed is by closing their eyes and mind to anything that contradicts the Biblical description. That person is simply incapable of embracing science in any form. That does not mean that people who reject the literal interpretation of Genesis are all atheists; they are not. But they understand that the message of the Bible is metaphorical and, indeed, is meant to be understood as metaphorical.

93 posted on 09/01/2012 6:56:43 PM PDT by exDemMom (Now that I've finally accepted that I'm living a bad hair life, I'm more at peace with the world.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: hosepipe; Alamo-Girl; TXnMA
Oh, my dear brother in Christ — May I give you a GREAT BIG HUG???!!!

Truly you have lifted my spirits today.

May God ever bless you! [And me. And all who read these lines.]

94 posted on 09/01/2012 7:12:44 PM PDT by betty boop (We are led to believe a lie when we see with, and not through the eye. — William Blake)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: Lonesome in Massachussets
Galileo wasn't the problem.

No matter how many political ballots were burned to select him, the Pope had no more business issuing edicts on natural matters like celestial mechanics than the politician-appointed SCOTUS had in declaring CO2 a pollutant. Both were acting outside their respective spheres of expertise and authority.

95 posted on 09/01/2012 7:21:59 PM PDT by TXnMA ("Allah": Satan's current alias...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: TXnMA

The Pope never issued an edict on celestial mechanics and as I stated previously, the Vatican, probably lead by the Jesuits who were crytpoheliocentrists, explicitly avoided the controversy. There were forces in the Vatican working to reconcile Catholic doctrine with heliocentricism. They saw Galileo as bull in a china shop. They knew the arguments and mathematics of heliocentricism better than he did, but they wanted to advance the ideas without creating any unnecessary confrontations and without confusing the laity. Martin Luther was on the record as condemning heliocentricism as sinful heresy, while the Vatican never spoke on the issue.

Galileo just had a way of making enemies and playing martyr for science. I suppose by forcing the issue he did manage to embarrass the Church for going on half a millennium. The Church never really requited his bile. He was treaty humanely while in house arrest and the Vatican has since cleared him. What he did may be seen as suffering for advancement of Truth and Science, but others see it as rank egotism and arrogance, which harmed an institution and individuals that had treated him very well.


96 posted on 09/01/2012 7:34:14 PM PDT by Lonesome in Massachussets (The Democratic Party strongly supports full civil rights for necro-Americans!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: Lonesome in Massachussets

I yield to your better-researched (or indoctrinated) grasp of the matter...


97 posted on 09/01/2012 7:52:05 PM PDT by TXnMA ("Allah": Satan's current alias...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: betty boop

[ Oh, my dear brother in Christ — May I give you a GREAT BIG HUG???!!! ]


Sure come on over here.. hold my cigar and beer..
(((( HUG )))) -—> I promise not to touch, you know, “anything”..


98 posted on 09/01/2012 9:22:10 PM PDT by hosepipe (This propaganda has been edited to include some fully orbed hyperbole..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: TXnMA

[ This physical chemist is one of those scientists. ]

This Software Engineer is too...
Nothing from nothing leaves nothing is axiomatic..


99 posted on 09/01/2012 9:25:46 PM PDT by hosepipe (This propaganda has been edited to include some fully orbed hyperbole..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: betty boop

Oh my betty, you really dont know me, nor what or how much I know about the subject matter at hand. Ironically, you sound much like Bill Nye there. My kids are fine, more than fine, but thanks for the concern. God bless you.


100 posted on 09/01/2012 9:42:05 PM PDT by Paradox (I want Obama defeated. Period.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 321-329 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson