Mitt Romney Comes Out in Support of Homosexual Boy Scout Leaders, Members

Christian News ^ | August 6, 2012 | Heather Clark

[Theodore R.]

Clayton Williams said pretty much something like that in 1990, and uninformed Republican voters, mostly women that time, turned to Ann W. Richards in the general election. Then she made possible GWB!!!

[xzins]

Is this AH trying to lose the election....not my choice and rapidly becoming I don’t care if BO wins.

He is either trying to:

1. Lose the election

OR

2. Create an openly liberal republican party that casts off conservatives. They want to be seen as the "moderate liberals" AND they want the democrats to be seen as the "RADICAL LEFTISTS".

[CatherineofAragon]

His loyalty to the homo crowd is unflagging——it mystifies me.

[xzins]

Perhaps he or someone close to him is AC/DC. That’s what did in Dick Cheney on this issue.

[RatRipper]

WRONG!!!!!!! Boy Scouts has always billed itself as a Christian organization. Admonishing the Boy Scouts to accept open homosexuals is the same thing as attacking Christianity, which is one of the main objectives of the gay rights movement. Such a position is opposes the free exercise of religion. Mitt is dead wrong on this one.

[Bailee]

Mittens “Homo Boy Scout leaders” you disgust me. You have not even won the nominee yet, already you run to left. I expect the next thing we will hear is your also pro abortion. Dont expect my vote in the General Election cause it ain’t happening.

Oh and Newt and Santorum thanks for selling out.

[Mouton]

I don’t think that a GOP that casts off conservatives has a chance to ever win any election ever, including dog catcher.

[fwdude]

Let’s see the Mittbots spin this.

[Gator113]

And it’s an almost daily “shove”. Quite frustrating.

[MrEdd]

The pedophile, homosexual, and abortion activist candidate advocated this position on television when he was Governor. Every single person who votes for him, whether in the primaries OR the general is for this.

No exceptions.

And they will be held accountable as it is continually thrown in their face there after.

Also no exceptions, and justifiably so. Things like Sandusky don't just happen. A whole lot of people help them along.

Are good men who do nothing...really good?

No. They are not.

[xzins]

The GOP-E thinks republicans can take over democrat moderate-liberal voters to make up for their loss of conservatives.

That leaves conservatives in the cold, but they don’t care. They simply don’t believe the same as conservatives.

[Thorliveshere]

Why am I suppose to vote for this guy again?

[xzins]

There are conservative choices.

[fwdude]

Why am I suppose to vote for this guy again?

Because he's not Obama; just a carbon copy.

[MrEdd]

Nor a baby that shouldn’t have been aborted, nor a doctor who shouldn’t work only on patients authorized by government bureaucrats.

[Steve Van Doorn]

"I have several opinions here. Which one would you like to help me get elected?"

That is how I read it to. He is just a used car salesman

[xzins]

Are good men who do nothing...really good?

Good post, Ed. Thanks.

[fwdude]

Agreed. I, too, refuse to vote for a godless liberal fascist, no matter what letter he has after his name. To hell with those who tell us that "a vote for anyone but Romney if a vote for Obama."

This is a test for conservatives, and the most important tests are hard. We either refuse to bow down to compromise on conservatism in the face of having the current fascist-in-chief "win" another 4 years, or we stop calling ourselves "conservatives."

[redtetrahedron]

And, unfortunately, the only chance any of them has of winning is for Romney to drop out.

[RinaseaofDs]

It’s not his honesty. It’s the fact that he’s a liberal. We got McCain again.

His Stake President isn’t going to be pleased, I would think, but I’ll bet Harry Reid’s is even more pissed.