Skip to comments.
Krauthammer Schools Entire 'Inside Washington' Panel on 'The Cowardice of the Democrats'
NewsBusters.org ^
| July 28, 2012
| Noel Sheppard
Posted on 07/28/2012 11:34:03 AM PDT by Kaslin
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-58 next last
1
posted on
07/28/2012 11:34:09 AM PDT
by
Kaslin
To: Kaslin
Would have been a good place to lay Fast and Furious and back door gun control on them.
2
posted on
07/28/2012 11:40:18 AM PDT
by
gusopol3
To: Kaslin
But krauthammer actually stated he was for gun control.
To: Kaslin
Note to libs: Do not debate with Charles. Not gonna end well for ya.
4
posted on
07/28/2012 11:45:40 AM PDT
by
Straight8
To: Kaslin
KRAUTHAMMER: I have spoken on this show for 20 years, I am not an opponent of gun control. I am not a fan of Krauthammer
5
posted on
07/28/2012 11:46:19 AM PDT
by
MileHi
( "It's coming down to patriots vs the politicians." - ovrtaxt)
To: Kaslin
CK is not very conservative. He appears that way on those shows because everyone else is so liberal.
6
posted on
07/28/2012 11:51:34 AM PDT
by
Bryan24
(When in doubt, move to the right..........)
To: Kaslin
I see a pre-revolutionary mindset beginning to form and the growing pro-2nd Amendment opinion is a reflection of it.
7
posted on
07/28/2012 11:52:47 AM PDT
by
WMarshal
(Free citizen, never a subject or a civilian)
To: WMarshal
I agree, our “elite” strives for Political Correctness and PC is an estrangement from reality. I think Krauthammer has mentioned that as well to his fellow liberals.
8
posted on
07/28/2012 11:59:45 AM PDT
by
junta
("Peace is a racket", testimony from crime boss Barrack Hussein Obama.)
To: MileHi
I disagree with Krauthammer on gun control. But he is a thoughtful person. I’m of the opinion that it is possible to disagree with someone without thinking they are either stupid or evil.
9
posted on
07/28/2012 12:03:56 PM PDT
by
NCLaw441
To: Kaslin
Charles appears right of center because he doesn’t justify his socialism with lies.
10
posted on
07/28/2012 12:09:00 PM PDT
by
BerryDingle
(I know how to deal with communists, I still wear their scars on my back from Hollywood-Ronald Reagan)
To: ozzymandus
so you are for NO gun control laws what so ever? Anyone can get a gun of any kind in any situation?
11
posted on
07/28/2012 12:11:37 PM PDT
by
fish hawk
(Religion: Man's attempt to gain salvation or the approbation of God by his own works)
To: All
12
posted on
07/28/2012 12:15:12 PM PDT
by
musicman
(Until I see the REAL Long Form Vault BC, he's just "PRES__ENT" Obama = Without "ID")
To: NCLaw441
Im of the opinion that it is possible to disagree with someone without thinking they are either stupid or evil. I didn't say he was either. To the extent that Krauthammer advances conservatism, I favor that. Gun control is not the only area in which he is not particularly conservative.
He is rather intelligent. I am just not a Krauthammer fan.
13
posted on
07/28/2012 12:18:14 PM PDT
by
MileHi
( "It's coming down to patriots vs the politicians." - ovrtaxt)
To: fish hawk
We have too many gun control laws now, but they are not enforced against criminals. Don't try to put words in my mouth. You sound like that idiot O’Reilly. I'm surprised you didn't mention “howitzers” and “bazookas”.
To: Kaslin
None of the electric fence liberals are going to make any points with Krauthammer.
15
posted on
07/28/2012 12:28:17 PM PDT
by
meatloaf
(Support Senate S 1863 & House Bill 1380 to eliminate oil slavery.)
To: Kaslin
Krauthammer didn't 'school' anybody - the three liberals' intellects were playing hooky. They weren't listening.
Leftists are impervious to facts.
16
posted on
07/28/2012 12:34:58 PM PDT
by
skeeter
To: meatloaf
Communism /socialism are responsible directly and indirectly for the deaths of more people than any other political ideology in history. Why don’t we ban them?
To: pieceofthepuzzle
That’s not a bad idea but you’d have to ban religion too.
18
posted on
07/28/2012 1:04:01 PM PDT
by
meatloaf
(Support Senate S 1863 & House Bill 1380 to eliminate oil slavery.)
To: meatloaf
I get your point, but I was trying to make a similar one. Humanity is flawed, and the reason why there have been so many recent killings in Chicago is not because of a gun policy, or because of tax policy, or because of a controversy over same-sex marriage. It's because the people involved are not restricted by their own internal values from committing these acts. I don't pretend to know all the reasons why this is true, but I'm very confident that it's not going to be fixed by a new law on the books.
To: meatloaf
pieceofthepuzzle:
"Communism /socialism are responsible directly and indirectly for the deaths of more people than any other political ideology in history. Why dont we ban them?"meatloaf: "Thats not a bad idea but youd have to ban religion too."
~~~~~~~~~
Banning communism/socialism is a worthy ideal, but you'd probably have to kill off the part of the populace that is genetically disposed to liberalism. But, you wouldn't have to ban religion -- just religion + (political) power. IOW, stick with the First Amendment.
20
posted on
07/28/2012 1:30:15 PM PDT
by
TXnMA
("Allah": Satan's current alias...)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-58 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson