Skip to comments.
Cyber bill has gun control amendment [Video at link]
The Hill ^
| July 26, 2012
| Ramsey Cox
Posted on 07/26/2012 5:46:43 PM PDT by jazusamo
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-73 last
To: Lazamataz
Well said, that is truly a pathetic group.
61
posted on
07/27/2012 8:51:31 AM PDT
by
jazusamo
("Intellect is not wisdom" -- Thomas Sowell)
To: danielmryan
Yup. Pubbies gotta stop accepting the paradigm.
62
posted on
07/27/2012 9:04:55 AM PDT
by
Still Thinking
(Freedom is NOT a loophole!)
To: William Tell
I wish you nothing but the very best of luck. Between Sacremento and the 9th Circus? You may well need all the good luck you can get...
63
posted on
07/27/2012 9:04:55 AM PDT
by
Dead Corpse
(I will not comply.)
To: aragorn
They think they have all the tools in place to assure a win.
They are wrong.
64
posted on
07/27/2012 9:06:17 AM PDT
by
Dead Corpse
(I will not comply.)
To: Dead Corpse
Dead Corpse said:
"Between Sacremento and the 9th Circus? " There certainly is an issue with the 9th Circus.
They were recently able to get rid of the Nordyke case after Alameda County basically caved on their prior stance that there was no way to have a gun show at the Alameda County fairgrounds with guns present. As a result, the 9th Circus didn't have to deal with the Second Amendment.
It's not going to be so easy for them to dispose of the other cases waiting for their attention. The Heller decision described keeping and bearing arms as a "fundamental right". This is powerful language. The McDonald case clarifies that the prohibition against infringements applies to states and localities.
Virtually all the claims that Kalifornia might make that there exist compelling reasons for their various infringements collapse in the light of the fact that so many states have no problem whatsoever providing "shall issue" carry permits, have no problem with allowing sales of rifles with pistol grips, have no problem with instant background checks. It's going to be a hard sell for the anti-gunners.
To: Dead Corpse
They think they have all the tools in place to assure a win. I agree with your assessment: they are wrong.
I read a quote once that seems apropos. I don't remember the source, so I can't double-check it, but it went something like this: "You cannot hide from a thinking man."
I wonder just what these fools believe they will achieve, and if in the end, whether they and their families will still believe that kicking over this particular hornets' nest was really worth the effort...
66
posted on
07/27/2012 12:37:09 PM PDT
by
aragorn
(We do indeed live in interesting times. FUBO.)
To: jazusamo
Major sucking up to Bloomberg.
67
posted on
07/27/2012 9:47:16 PM PDT
by
Fred
(http://www.obamanomicsoutsourced.com/)
To: Travis McGee
68
posted on
07/27/2012 10:00:45 PM PDT
by
Fred
(http://www.obamanomicsoutsourced.com/)
To: Fred; Joe Brower; marktwain; MestaMachine; Nachum
Amen! Here's one more I just put together.
69
posted on
07/28/2012 4:37:10 AM PDT
by
Travis McGee
(www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com)
To: jazusamo
Schmuckie and Nobrand are not satisfied that we already have this 10 round restriction in NY. Have to special order some firearms. They have to try to ram this nonsense through the rest of the country.
70
posted on
07/28/2012 8:06:19 AM PDT
by
dervish
(ABO)
To: jazusamo
Chuck can go (rhymes with Chuck) himself.
71
posted on
07/28/2012 3:14:34 PM PDT
by
Darren McCarty
(Holding my nose one more time to get rid of Eric Holder)
To: philman_36
(A) means a magazine, belt, drum, feed strip, or similar device that has a capacity of, or that can be readily restored or converted to accept, more than 10 rounds of ammunition; but (B) does not include an attached tubular device designed to accept, and capable of operating only with, .22 caliber rimfire ammunitionSo all the old Marlin 1894C's in 357 and 44 magnum would be outlawed? Kiss my ass Schmucky. You're still a putz head.
72
posted on
07/28/2012 11:05:17 PM PDT
by
metalurgist
( Want your country back? It'll take guns and rope. Marxists won't give up peaceably.)
To: metalurgist
So all the old Marlin 1894C's in 357 and 44 magnum would be outlawed?
No, they're grandfathered in. You have to read the rest of the amendment.
(ii) Clause (i) shall not apply to the possession of a large capacity ammunition feeding device otherwise lawfully possessed within the United States on or before the date of the enactment of this subsection.
73
posted on
07/29/2012 8:06:57 AM PDT
by
philman_36
(Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty, and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-73 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson