Posted on 07/25/2012 6:35:57 PM PDT by mnehring
“Switch hitter Goode isn’t that candidate.”
And neither is Romney.
“If you put Romney in, who’s going to fight for us? Are you willing to elect Hitler to represent you?”
Godwin’s Law.
It’s bad enough when leftists and Democrats are compared with Hitler on this forum (utter extremist hyperbole) but that takes the cake.
FACT: Obama is WORSE than Romney .... by a wide margin.
Romney will be one our side on a number off issues and will sign off on conservative budgets and tax reform that obama will veto.
Voting for Goode will just make it easier for Obama.
Throwaway vote. That’s no ‘fighting’ anything.
Elections: It’s to decide who will get into office.
If the result of your vote is to make it easier for Obama to win re-election, then that’s the consequence of your vote.
Do YOU want to make it easier for Obama to get re-elected???
“The bad news: They might give it to him in the form of a small idiotic minority like the gift of Nader to us in Floriduh back in 2000. Just look at the imbeciles on this thread and their pretense of “purity”. Yeah, yeah, let’s reenact Picketts Charge, I mean, what could possibly go wrong?”
History repeats itself because dunderheads keep saying that ‘this time its different”
Republicans George Allen lost VA in 2006 by a mere 500 votes.
If you think it cant happen again in your state, think again.
If your vote REALLY was the deciding vote between Obama and Romney, how would you vote?
Then vote that way, because ... well, it just might happen that way!
Perhaps you are a DU troll as someone else suggested.
You’re wasting your time arguing with the pinheads who will vote 3rd party to make a point. They are narrow minded single issue voters who don’t care if Obama gets re-elected. It’s ironic that they b*tch about Romney being pro-choice but they will vote for a 3rd party candidate that will get them the abortion loving Obama for 4 more years.
Kind of like cutting off your nose to spite your face.
That assumes (falsely) that the votes were Romney's to begin with.
In a word, yes.
Would he institute Fast and Furious in order to propagandize against guns?
Would he have instituted amnesty as O did?
Would he destroy the economy with worthless, Marxist, destructive ideas?
Would he race bait endlessly?
Would he sue Arizona, then refuse to implement the law?
Would he have gutted welfare reform?
Would he continue to devastate the military?
Would he have forced Catholics and Evangelicals to pay for abortion?
Would he have stopped drilling in the gulf, stopped the Canadian pipeline, destroyed the coal industry?
Etc, etc, on and on and on ad nauseum. You could show the difference all day, but the idiots would keep saying we have to be "pure" so they answer yes to any question of comparison you give them.
Sorry, O is the worst, most destructive, anti-American, anti-everything we love and stand for, to say we want to give him another four years is simply insane.
Here's what we know:
1. O is a dedicated radical leftist who is the most destructive, divisive, anti-american, pro-marxist, pro-muzzie, pro-death, pro-enviro, pro-race baiting preezie ever.
2. Romney is not trustworthy as a conservative, even though he has run as one.
3. We can trust one of them to destroy everything we love and stand for, and we don't know how the other will govern.
It's simple, we die with the one, or we work on the other.
I stand with Palin, Newt, Perry, Santorum, Cain, Rush, Levin and every pother conservative we have supported on this forum; ABO, we can't stand another four years. Kindly think about it.
Because he believes that killing unborn children is wrong.
“Romney will be one our side on a number off issues and will sign off on conservative budgets and tax reform that obama will veto.”
So apparently budgest + tax reform is more important to you than unborn children. Why am I not surprised?
Not at all. I said ‘a number of issues’ that are all important and Romney will be better on pretty much all of them. Obama is the most pro-abortion President ever, and Romney has pledged to be pro-life, reverse Obama’s policies like mexico city policy and HHS policies and Planned Parenthood funding, and appoint judges who take a Scalia stance not a ginsburg stance on Roe v Wade. Romney has echoed support for repealing Roe v Wade. Obama is running ads now calling Romney ‘extreme’ for being prolife.
You can admit that those differences are real and vote the more conservative viable candidate.
Or you can vote 3rd party, engage in the fantasy that it will make a difference and watch Obama in his second term do even more damage on this and other issues.
“Romney has pledged to be pro-life, reverse Obama’s policies like mexico city policy and HHS policies and Planned Parenthood funding, and appoint judges who take a Scalia stance not a ginsburg stance on Roe v Wade. Romney has echoed support for repealing Roe v Wade. Obama is running ads now calling Romney ‘extreme’ for being prolife.”
Romney’s blowing smoke up your ass.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a9IJUkYUbvI
“You can admit that those differences are real”
Or I can speak the truth that Romney is lying to you.
“Or you can vote 3rd party, engage in the fantasy that it will make a difference”
If you’re voting to ‘make a difference’, why aren’t you supporting Obama?
I vote for the candidate that I trust, who doesn’t lie to me about his stances. That rules out Romney and Obama.
You couldn't possible be any more wrong. This surely proves my point.
Your delusion proves mine.
LLS
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.