Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Just my opinion, Papa Paterno's affection for the GOP(Reagan/Bush) was fake.

Papa Paterno, relayed his true political views to his son.

1 posted on 07/23/2012 10:09:11 PM PDT by DallasBiff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-24 last
To: DallasBiff; All

Papa Paterno, relayed his true political views to his son.
_____________________________________________________________

Maybe; maybe not. I’m a Reagan Republican and all three of my boys are too. But, then, in all fairness, look at Ronnie Reagan Jr. and his ultra-Lib Sister, Patti Davis (She took her mom’s maiden name instead of the last name “Reagan”.) What a liberal witch; or a word that rhymes with “witch”. They did not take the baton on Ronald Reagan’s Conservatism.


37 posted on 07/24/2012 6:49:25 AM PDT by pistolpackinpapa (Why is it that you never see any Obama bumper stickers on cars going to work in the mornings?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DallasBiff

This article and any like it are nothing but pure political propaganda.

Obambi and his minions in the press know that a vast majority of PSU fans still worship JoPa and think PSU is getting a bum rap here.

By floating these articles they are trying to get these fans to think that Abama is with them even though he is not publicly saying anything.

It is all about trying to get these fans to vote for Obama in November.


39 posted on 07/24/2012 7:00:39 AM PDT by commish (Freedom tastes sweetest to those who have fought to preserve it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DallasBiff
Just my opinion, Papa Paterno's affection for the GOP(Reagan/Bush) was fake. Papa Paterno, relayed his true political views to his son.Papa Paterno's affection for the GOP(Reagan/Bush)

Or his father's affection was genuine and it just never reached his son.

40 posted on 07/24/2012 11:01:12 AM PDT by Uncle Chip
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DallasBiff

To: All

IT’S HIGH TIME L/E NAILS EX-PS PRES SPANIER FOR PROTECTING SANDUSKY’S WELL-KNOWN NEFARIOUS ACTIVITIES NBC news reported Emails uncovered by investigators suggest Spanier colluded with PS’s former Senior VP for Finance and Business, saying it would be “humane” to Sandusky to NOT alert authorities, NBC news reported.

COMMENTS Even left-leaning college administrators are starting to have second thoughts about the excesses of “gay-friendly” atmospheres on campus........these pedophile-havens have held numerous “homo-sensitivity training” sessions on campus......(read indoctrination).

Penn State prez Graham Spanier-—is a “human sexuality scholar.” How this guy got to be a college prez with that degree is amazing. SPANIER actually held what he called a “C***fest” on campus and installed a special tent just to indoctrinate WRT homo sex practices.

Spanier is out as PS prez-—but he and his wife are still on the PS payroll as tenured profs. Spanier also advocated wife-swapping——could be the reason why M/M Spanier are still getting paychecks-—they must have some hair-raising stories to tell WRT group sex play on the PS campus.

SPANIER CONTROLLED MILLIONS IN STATE AND FEDERAL EDUCATION GRANTS L/E needs to determine the extent of PS’s federal, state and local govt grants which emanate from an assortment of govt entities.....that might have covertly subsidized pedophile activities.

Besides the DOE, grants could have been issued by the EPA and DOJ for various campus projects——including monies private Foundations from a variety of private charitable organizations AND funding from more traditional sources, such as corporate and private foundations. Checkout PS donors available from the Capital Research Center, a non-profit which studies advocacy groups.

Report your concerns here: FBI TIPS PAGE: https://tips.fbi.gov/

SOURCE: deadspin.COM

The majority of attention given to today’s Freeh Report has centered on figuring out Joe Paterno’s role in allowing Jerry Sandusky to go unstopped. But the most actively nefarious character—other than Sandusky himself—in the commission’s story is former university president Graham Spanier. Even before today’s news, experts had suggested that Spanier’s actions could be brought before a grand jury. Here are ten of the more reprehensible plot points from the Freeh Report, many of which support the notion that he could face criminal charges:

<><> Testifying to the 2001 grand jury he was unaware of the 1998 investigation against Sandusky, even though emails from 1998 show him discussing the investigation with athletic director Tim Curley and university vice president Gary Schultz.

<><> Repeating this claim to the Special Investigative Counsel, and stating he “never heard a report from anyone” that Sandusky was abusing children.

<><> Failing to notify the Board of Trustees that an investigation of a prominent assistant football coach was underway, withholding this information from them even while the board was considering (and approving) a favorable land deal between the university and Sandusky’s Second Mile charity.

<><>Approving and pushing for Sandusky’s emeritus rank—and the facility access privileges that came along with it— despite Sandusky not qualifying for it by the established academic rules.

<><>Declaring Curley’s plan to suggest Sandusky stop hanging around children, without actual sanctions, to be “a humane approach” rather than contacting outside authorities to investigate suspected abuse.

<><>Telling the Special Investigative Counsel his first knowledge of the 1998 incident came at the April 2011 grand jury appearance, when notes from his Attorney General interview a month prior reveal he was questioned about it then.

<><> Approving an unprecedented $168,000 lump-sum retirement payment to Sandusky in 1999.

<><> Showing no interest in identifying the child involved in the 2001 incident or ascertaining whether or not a crime had occurred.

<><> Opposing any and all independent investigations into Sandusky’s behavior.

<><> Modifying the November 2011 Board of Trustees statement without their knowledge or approval, asserting that Curley and Schultz requested administrative leave rather than that the board had actually decided to place them on leave.

10 posted on Fri Jul 20 2012 08:43:08 GMT-0600 (Central Standard Time) by Liz

I think that pretty well says it —

ttp://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/2909606/posts?page=282#282


43 posted on 07/24/2012 4:50:31 PM PDT by Uncle Chip
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-24 last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson