Skip to comments.
Launch of Second Canberra-Class light carrier for Australia
Royal Australian Navy ^
| July 05, 2012
| Royal Australian Navy
Posted on 07/06/2012 9:08:48 PM PDT by JerseyanExile
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-26 next last
To: JerseyanExile
Same displacement as a WW2 Essex class CV.
To: JerseyanExile
3
posted on
07/06/2012 9:21:09 PM PDT
by
rmlew
("Mosques are our barracks, minarets our bayonets, domes our helmets, the believers our soldiers.")
To: JerseyanExile
4
posted on
07/06/2012 9:22:31 PM PDT
by
SandRat
(Duty - Honor - Country! What else needs said?)
To: JerseyanExile
From the photo I see the upshot bow characteristic of most British carriers, why has the US not adopted this profile ... or, why have the British chosen this over the flat deck of the US carriers? Is it because it is smaller then most US carriers and thus the need for the upthust in deck design?
5
posted on
07/06/2012 9:28:20 PM PDT
by
doc1019
(Voting for the lesser of two evils is still voting for evil.)
To: doc1019
It’s because they use the Sea Harrier Jump Jet which requires that shape bow. I don’t think you can use a steam-launch catapult and send a twenty ton F-18 Hornet from zero to 130 mph in two seconds with a bow like that.
6
posted on
07/06/2012 9:32:47 PM PDT
by
jmacusa
(Political correctness is cultural Marxism. I'm not a Marxist.)
To: jmacusa
Thanks for your input ... makes sense. Sounds like they have chosen to use this type of Jet for years to come otherwise a flat deck may be more prudent for future consideration, what with the cost of a carrier and all.
7
posted on
07/06/2012 9:39:36 PM PDT
by
doc1019
(Voting for the lesser of two evils is still voting for evil.)
To: jmacusa
They need the ramp because they take off at lower speed than US jets, that use steam catapults or now the new electromagnetic catapults.
8
posted on
07/06/2012 9:41:49 PM PDT
by
Secret Agent Man
(I can neither confirm or deny that; even if I could, I couldn't - it's classified.)
To: doc1019
To: Aussiebabe
Something like WWII jeep carriers ... makes even more sense. Thanks for the education.
10
posted on
07/06/2012 9:47:44 PM PDT
by
doc1019
(Voting for the lesser of two evils is still voting for evil.)
To: Aussiebabe
Why would the Australian Navy have designed it with a ski-jump ramp unless they wanted to have the option of flying Harriers or F-35s off them in the future?
To: Secret Agent Man
Electromagnetic Catapults? Please elucidate. Or at the least, give me a link. I have never heard of such a technology.
12
posted on
07/06/2012 10:03:01 PM PDT
by
doc1019
(Voting for the lesser of two evils is still voting for evil.)
To: doc1019
13
posted on
07/06/2012 10:07:26 PM PDT
by
rottndog
(Be Prepared.....for what's coming AFTER America.)
To: rottndog
14
posted on
07/06/2012 10:09:03 PM PDT
by
doc1019
(Voting for the lesser of two evils is still voting for evil.)
To: doc1019
Electromagnetic Catapults...Rail Guns all powered by loads of electricity from the nuclear reactors.
Info here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZEOXScdv3FE&feature=related
15
posted on
07/06/2012 10:18:40 PM PDT
by
spokeshave
(The only people better off today than 4 years ago are the Prisoners at Guantanamo.)
To: spokeshave
16
posted on
07/06/2012 10:20:05 PM PDT
by
doc1019
(Voting for the lesser of two evils is still voting for evil.)
To: doc1019
The newest carriers will have them. Just Google it. Steam is being replaced.
17
posted on
07/06/2012 10:32:02 PM PDT
by
Secret Agent Man
(I can neither confirm or deny that; even if I could, I couldn't - it's classified.)
To: Secret Agent Man
18
posted on
07/06/2012 10:33:15 PM PDT
by
doc1019
(Voting for the lesser of two evils is still voting for evil.)
To: doc1019
Also there are changes to the arrestor cables too, in the way they work. The new carriers have larger nuke engines and have a lot more power to deal with launches and new em weapons that will be coming online.
19
posted on
07/06/2012 11:18:47 PM PDT
by
Secret Agent Man
(I can neither confirm or deny that; even if I could, I couldn't - it's classified.)
To: JerseyanExile
They came with the ski jump as part of the existing design and keeping it gives the RAN more future options than getting rid of it. There's no current plans to fly fixed wing aircraft off the Canberra's, but it would be a huge mistake to lose the capability when there's no reason not to keep it.
20
posted on
07/07/2012 1:09:22 AM PDT
by
naturalman1975
("America was under attack. Australia was immediately there to help." - John Winston Howard)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-26 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson