Skip to comments.
Chief Justice Roberts, You Fox You
The American spectator ^
| 7-5-12
| R. Emmett Tyrrell, Jr.
Posted on 07/05/2012 6:46:08 AM PDT by afraidfortherepublic
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 121-132 next last
To: Houghton M.
Anyone who suggests otherwise must be condemned as the spawn of Satan and a demon from hell. Worse than that, as a RINO. Justice Roberts is more respected on FR than those stupid Romney supporters if that's any consolation.
To: Houghton M.
"The purpose of humankind, like that of all other creation, is to sustain aa. For humankind, this occurs through active participation in life and the exercise of constructive thoughts, words and deeds."
Robert's Cannonball to become the second coming of John Marshall has left the tracks....
And that's the truth.
62
posted on
07/05/2012 7:43:08 AM PDT
by
Paladin2
To: sand88
Levin clearly explained there is NO silver lining... I really like the way it was put...
Putting the single-opinion-brakes on the commerce clause *was* a silver lining, much like the silver lining on the hull of the Hindenburg.
63
posted on
07/05/2012 7:44:50 AM PDT
by
C210N
("ask not what the candidate can do for you, ask what you can do for the candidate" (Breitbart, 2012))
To: TexasCajun
‘Those stupid Romney supporters.’
Thanx. I have now decided to depart from all threads where morons show up.
I know you’ll miss me.
64
posted on
07/05/2012 7:45:45 AM PDT
by
altura
(Vote Romney. He's our only hope.)
To: Alberta's Child
>>> Justice Roberts was right when he said that it’s not the Court’s job to protect Americans from the consequences of their political choices. <<<
Hogwash, I am trying to be polite here. SC Justices’ job is to uphold the Constitutionality of any law passed by the legislatives. If it is not constitutional, it shouldn’t be made a law.
IF YOUR SINGLE VOTE uphold an unconstitutional law to enslave the whole nation under gubbmint boots, do we the people not deserve a better explanation? Why did you change your reasoning?
In fact, I think CJ Roberts SHOULD explain himself soon. He owed us.
65
posted on
07/05/2012 7:49:55 AM PDT
by
Sir Napsalot
(Pravda + Useful Idiots = CCCP; JournOList + Useful Idiots = DopeyChangey!)
To: ontap
“So .....His intentions were good when he stabbed us in the back!!!!”
Bullseye.
To: afraidfortherepublic
R. Emmett Tyrrell, Jr., now officially a moron.
67
posted on
07/05/2012 7:53:18 AM PDT
by
free me
(Roberts killed America)
To: TruthShallSetYouFree
“Fixed it.”
Dude you’re on fire today!
To: afraidfortherepublic
so its all a “cunning plan”!
69
posted on
07/05/2012 7:54:34 AM PDT
by
Reily
To: afraidfortherepublic
70
posted on
07/05/2012 7:55:29 AM PDT
by
kenavi
(Obama doesn't hate private equity. He wants to be it with our money.)
To: afraidfortherepublic
In my simplistic mind I see it this way... Suppose the constitution says that all laws must be dogs. The justices look at the law and say yes it is or no it isn't a dog. Obamacare is a cat. Not a cute youtue video cat but a yowly, mangy, hissing flea factory.
What John Roberts did was to take some duct tape, construction paper and some third grade creativity to make the Obamcare "Bill the Cat" look like a dog (from a very great distance) thus declaring the abomination a constituional "dog".
"Ashamed" is one of the many things John Roberts should be.
71
posted on
07/05/2012 7:59:44 AM PDT
by
tbpiper
To: afraidfortherepublic
Tyrrell always gets it wrong.
72
posted on
07/05/2012 8:02:14 AM PDT
by
Georgia Girl 2
(The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped.)
To: Alberta's Child
We send Republicans to the House of Representatives and then behave like Democrats.
We send Republicans to the United States Senate and then behave like Democrats.
We send Republicans to the White House and they behave like Democrats.
Why are we surprised when those we send to the Supreme Court behave like Democrats?
Good post.
73
posted on
07/05/2012 8:04:26 AM PDT
by
nathanbedford
("Attack, repeat, attack!" Bull Halsey)
To: afraidfortherepublic
Fox???? BS -——Weasel is more like it.
74
posted on
07/05/2012 8:09:15 AM PDT
by
Venturer
To: altura
Sorry you didn't recognize the dripping sarcasm.
...but you know what I'm talking about.
To: afraidfortherepublic
Another normally intelligent conservative acts stupidly. Mark Levin is THE authority on this. Listen to his every podcast since last Thursday to understand why this is a complete disaster.
To: afraidfortherepublic
It astounds me how many conservatives keep trying to polish that turd.
To: TruthShallSetYouFree
78
posted on
07/05/2012 8:15:04 AM PDT
by
bmwcyle
(Corollary - Electing the same person over and over and expecting a different outcome is insanity)
To: Alberta's Child
If I were sitting on the U.S. Supreme Court when this case came up, I would have refused to hear it at all. It HAD to be heard by SCOTUS, otherwise the the lower court rulings would have stood.
79
posted on
07/05/2012 8:15:48 AM PDT
by
JohnG45
To: Houghton M.
You nailed it.
Part of the problem is that the vast majority making such pronouncements have absolutely no ability to interpret what happened.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 121-132 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson