Posted on 07/04/2012 11:47:16 AM PDT by matt04
“Will the ACLU be liable if some pervert uses the App for nefarious activities?”
“Will gun manufacturers be liable if some criminal uses their product for nefarious activities?”
The answer to both questions should be the same. I vote for “no”.
My son, who is a cop was the subject of a scathing letter to the editor, in which the woman lied repeatedly. The police chief wrote his own letter to the editor, daring the woman to sue my son or the police department. It seems the entire traffic stop was audio and video taped, he invited her or any expert to examine the tape, to insure that it was original and unedited.
The chief had high praise for my son’s professionalism. Not so much as an impolite word or action from him, the woman, one of Holder’s people made up the whole thing, including charges of racism.
She has not taken the chief up on his dare.
Video/audio tape works both ways.
The police department should sue her for every food stamp she has.
Is there a button to get a replacement for the cell phone the police officer shoved up your patoot?
Good for your son. Video is great for defense. But too many videos are “lost” or “accidentally deleted”, or they “forgot” to turned it on.
And some take their victims out of camera view. Officer harless did that. a third party recording and storage is best. No cop should have control of his recording device or tape. And the shouldn’t be allowed laws protecting against being recorded. Cockroaches love the dark.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.