Health Care Ruling Changes National Debate(Right-Wing Extremism Suffered Big Political Defeat)

PeoplesWorld.org ^ | June 29, 2012 | John-Rummel

[tobyhill]

They can’t.

[Monorprise]

Assuming you can trust Mitt, to what end do we expend such a great wealth of treasure & effort so that we may be secure in his “benevolent care” for only anther 4 years.

Even if we could win this election we can never hope to win every other election, nor could we hope that our politicians would remain honest if we did.

We need a Constitution(limits) of Government. Only in a constitution may any of our liberties be secure.

[Monorprise]

The federal despots will demand you send them proof.

[slowhandluke]

The waivers aren't constitutional if this is a tax. Accepting that government gets to view ObamaCare as a tax or a penalty depending on what is needed is accepting the liberal point of view, and will leave us lost in the fog.

Dropping the penalty to 1$ will not work. It will bankrupt the goernment plan, as well as the private insurers as nobody will buy insurance until needed.

A $1 penalty will work only if all Federal regs on what must be insured are dropped, as well as the requirement to take pre-existing conditions.

This law is so severely screwed up, complete repeal is the only answer. But then I think that was the intent, to make the only answer the one that will be the hardest to do.