Posted on 06/27/2012 10:17:37 AM PDT by Brown Deer
Thanks TW
Others may want to read letter too.
A thread noting the lawsuit was on FR the morning that 0 triggered EP. Personally posted the link to several threads that day. There were quite a few links posted to that thread.
What the Obambi and the idiots in charge have TOLD US is bad enough- a botched operation to sell, then track, guns into Mexico...
So if that is the truth, show us the documents that tell us whose idiotic idea it was so we can fire his a$$.
But, there must be more to it than that, or else they would gladly show us the info that backs up the story they already gave us.
I mean, they TOLD us the truth, right? There is no MORE to this story, is there?
Family of slain ICE agent filed claim with gov't
Another FR thread here (different article):
Family of ICE agent slain by cartel files death claim (against federal government)
Here is the thread from the day of the EP
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2897565/posts?page=1
Jaime Zapata’s murder was even more suspicious. He was investigaing F & F. ..... several links posted above.
Thanks for producing this letter for the thread.
It is a stunning letter. Rep. Issa is basically calling the _resident a liar and and a scoundrel. If, as has been rumored for the last week or so, he has copies of many of the documents, the _resident is trapped. I don’t think Issa would have worded it so starkly if he did not know the answers to his questions. There will likely be further delay and stonewalling, but eventually there will be a break.
AND 0 and the DOg J have the discovery segment of the Zapata wrongful death suit to look forward to.....
The article here-—post 20-— , the same one you pinged me to on the other thread, is dated June 20. BUT the Zapata lawsuit was filed on June 14. See post 24 for article.
Obama Adm had to have known. They are in a vice grip. How will the little houdinis escape?
“. . . discovery segment of the Zapata wrongful death suit . . . “
I had not thought of that, but yes, that’s another way for this thing to unravel.
YES they knew. If you’ll note on my post of that day, IMO it was the most significant news of the day......0 and withHolder are being held by the short hairs.....TOO bad, No escapte!/s
The best they can hope for is delay until after the election.
IMO Theory on why CongressCritters haven’t mention Zapata (suit) lately is they do not want it to APPEAR they are working together.
So....How is EP related to discovery in the lawsuit?
Actually, Zapata and Avila are filing separate claims/lawsuits and article names attorneys.
I haven’t seen published anywhere the detail of info on the lawsuit as is in the article, link post 24. Unfortunately, it is AP.
And what does this mean (from the article)?
“The claim notice is a precursor to a lawsuit.”
A claim has been filed, but not a lawsuit?
Can the Obama Adm EP kill two birds with one stone, i.e., stonewall Issa (as you said, run out the election clock) and shut down discovery in the lawsuits?
I just read it. It is!
There will likely be further delay and stonewalling
We can depend on it.
Check my posts for that day. There is a letter, written by Grassley on a PPDF file that someone converted to HTML for me. It gives great detail of what happened that day. Who was involved. Who walked the guns. Who gave the order for these two agents to cross the border at great risk?
Congress has the good on the locals and apparently whistle blowing documents that tie it to the higher ups.
Letter was written in March IIRC. Bcsco helped find information that day and probably has it all documented.
5.56mm
Thanks. Great job!
You should be able to save the file once it loads...
Please see my post #38. I’d added you in the response, but in editing, your name was somehow lost. It’s the Grassley letter of March 4th that Hoosiermama refers to in her post #35.
TY
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.