Skip to comments.
A Rising Tide of Acid Off California
ScienceNOW ^
| 14 June 2012
| Robert F. Service
Posted on 06/25/2012 1:27:18 AM PDT by neverdem
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-70 next last
To: samtheman
2. What other lies has the author told? Minor, but important, correct.
41
posted on
06/25/2012 5:30:25 AM PDT
by
Pecos
(Constitution? Oh, you mean that thing we USED to have.)
To: Jack Hydrazine
“The relationship is obvious to the casual observer.” Isn’t that the line they always gave in college?
42
posted on
06/25/2012 5:31:59 AM PDT
by
Pecos
(Constitution? Oh, you mean that thing we USED to have.)
To: muawiyah
I wonder how they explain the reefs in the Coral Sea, which are so numerous and so shallow that you can just stick your head under water while standing to observe what takes SCUBA equipment elsewhere. Very warm water, lots of resort islands, loads of tourists and good sized cities along the Australian coast and yet: coral mounts, so close together they are a hazard to navigation and so shallow they receive lots of UV, evolved there and have existed for millions of years.
Every few years there is a breathless report of environmental peril to the Great Barrier Reef. It survives.
To: neverdem
I believe a nuclear war would trim the CO2 levels.
Perhaps that’s a case the lib’s could make, for Israel attacking Iran?
They could endorse this man-made solution for their imagined man-made problem.
44
posted on
06/25/2012 5:40:27 AM PDT
by
G Larry
(There's no hope of a safe landing when you hire a suicidal pilot!)
To: neverdem
A Rising Tide of Acid Off California Oh wow man...it's like...ACID...dude.
45
posted on
06/25/2012 5:42:06 AM PDT
by
ROCKLOBSTER
(Celebrate Republicans Freed the Slaves Month.)
To: neverdem
A little soda ash will take care of this emergency :^)
46
posted on
06/25/2012 5:59:09 AM PDT
by
pepperdog
(Why are Democrats Afraid of a Voter ID Law?)
To: Bronco_Buster_FweetHyagh
Another BS Greenie angle. I NEVER believe ANYTHING they say now.
47
posted on
06/25/2012 6:04:32 AM PDT
by
RatRipper
(I'll ride a turtle to work every day before I buy anything from Government Motors.)
To: neverdem
Now, a new high resolution computer model This is how we wasted billions on the global warming nonsense!!
48
posted on
06/25/2012 6:07:26 AM PDT
by
ontap
To: Humble Servant
You forgot, Women and children hardest hit and Bushs fault What about us minorities and poor folks?
To: SampleMan
So man makes 35 billion metric tons of CO2 each year? Really? That would be 7 metric tons per man woman and child. This comes to 43 lb. per day per human. I dont think so I'll try harder!
50
posted on
06/25/2012 6:13:27 AM PDT
by
Gorzaloon
(The Google thing is in the yard again. Sniffed the laundry, now it's looking in the septic tank.)
To: neverdem
I don’t care what ‘environmentalists’ say - they’re mostly liars. It’s NOT science - it’s ‘political’ science - at best...
51
posted on
06/25/2012 6:21:34 AM PDT
by
GOPJ
(The 'doting court eunuchs' of the MSM fail to notice...)
To: neverdem
If this continues, the oceans will be destroyed! As if a humongous amount of crude oil was released into the ocean, but wait................. that already happened and God created a humongous number of bacteria to eat it all. I guess I won't panic just yet.
1. The odds that the “scientists” are WRONG, is very high.
2. If they are right, God will fix it.
52
posted on
06/25/2012 6:27:55 AM PDT
by
faucetman
( Just the facts, ma'am, Just the facts)
To: neverdem
The actual source of increase pH and acidity is sulfur. The volcanic activity in the ring of fire where sulfur is constantly being mixed into the water via volcanic eruption about the oceans and below the oceans generates the increases. Supposed science (carbon dioxide is the culprit) does not make it true science. Did algore help publish this report?
53
posted on
06/25/2012 6:44:17 AM PDT
by
no-to-illegals
(Please God, Protect and Bless Our Men and Women in Uniform with Victory. Amen.)
To: Pecos
Some are obvious, most are not. We have such a low level of CO2 today compared to the Cambrian age that those idiots should be scream about the opposite.
54
posted on
06/25/2012 6:58:53 AM PDT
by
Jack Hydrazine
(It's the end of the world as we know it and I feel fine!)
To: Carry_Okie
Silly me. I thought CO2 was chemically neutral. Ah, well, what do I know? I guess I have a just basic understanding.I think we should ask Flipper. He's got more sense than these "scientists".
Wonder who paid for this "study"???
55
posted on
06/25/2012 7:02:30 AM PDT
by
SCalGal
(Friends don't let friends donate to H$U$ or PETA.)
To: Gorzaloon
Me too.
I guess I’ll have to get out there and mow the lawn then I’ll throw a couple of shrimp on the barbee.
To: neverdem
57
posted on
06/25/2012 7:12:13 AM PDT
by
dfwgator
To: Jack Hydrazine
I should have added the </sarc> tag to my post.
58
posted on
06/25/2012 7:33:56 AM PDT
by
Pecos
(Constitution? Oh, you mean that thing we USED to have.)
To: SCalGal
The funniest part about this “study” is that most of the year, the wind blows off the ocean and carries the added carbon dioxide inland. There is no way California could be causing the effects these “scientists” supposedly found.
59
posted on
06/25/2012 9:18:59 AM PDT
by
Carry_Okie
(The Slave Party Switcheroo: Economic crisis! Zero's eligibility Trumped!! Hillary 2012!!!)
To: Carry_Okie
You want critical thinking. Don’t you realize that their liberal heads will explode?
60
posted on
06/25/2012 10:22:05 AM PDT
by
SCalGal
(Friends don't let friends donate to H$U$ or PETA.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-70 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson