Posted on 05/31/2012 7:03:12 AM PDT by Kaslin
A reasonable “rule of thumb” is that stupid people who make a series of decisions get some of them right by accident. The percentage depends largely on how many possible choices there are, for instance in an either or choice even a coin toss should produce the correct decision in half the cases over a long period. It appears to me that Obama NEVER makes the correct choice, therefor it cannot be a case of incompetence or stupidity. He is not very smart but someone is making his decisions for him and that someone is bent on destroying America and that someone knows what the correct choice is every time because otherwise they could not feed him the wrong choice every time. Can you name one decision of any importance that he has gotten right?
I agree. It is by design.
The tightening of the credit markets
The explosion of regulation
The gutting of conventional energy
The ossification of the financial markets
The burden of Obamacare
The blundering in foreign policy
And the list goes on... So many wrong decisions cannot be an accident. It cannot be adequately explained by stupidity.
I think Obama means to shut down the means of upward mobility so that he can introduce the concept of static class structure to the United States. Then the underclass can, at last, be induced into action against the productive class, and the Revolution, so long dreamed of, can at last be achieved.
Fundamental Transformation.
Both
I think the first two letters are “OB...”
Just curious...
I've seen quite a few photos with his middle finger alongside his face
“I think Obama means to shut down the means of upward mobility so that he can introduce the concept of static class structure to the United States. Then the underclass can, at last, be induced into action against the productive class, and the Revolution, so long dreamed of, can at last be achieved.”
//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
I think you are spot on, it would be hard to make a case against what you say. The effort to revert to a permanent class structure probably began shortly after the end of WWII, they apparently want to go back to the old way when someone born of peasants died a peasant with very near no hope of rising above that level.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.