Posted on 05/30/2012 8:27:26 PM PDT by John Leland 1789
You better watch posting this stuff - graphic description of gay acts to make a larger point, will get you banned by some mods here.
“Homosexuals indulge in incredible, unbelievable, vile, vulgar, even violent activities detrimental to themselves and society such as fisting (don’t ask); rimming (don’t ask again); illegal drug use; eating or rubbing their bodies with a lover’s feces; autoerotic asphyxiation (about 1,000 die each year); sadomasochism, urine drinking; golden showers (water sports); insertion of bottles, flashlights and other objects up a “lovers” rear; and other repulsive activities. I would love to hear a defense of those activities. “
I don’t justify a single one of those practices, but there are an increasingly large number of straight people that do all of those things too. I have many friends in the medical field, and I’ve heard a number of stories, and they all involved males and females together, or “straight people” by themselves.
Sexual sin has a snowballing effect. Anything besides a man and woman, married, leads to a desensitizing of sexual purity. The sky’s the limit, or rather, the pit is bottomless. Sexual morality as a whole is declining, and while the homosexual agenda itself is terrible, if all homosexuality disappeared overnight, the majority (”whole”) of the world (or At least U.S.) would probably lie in sin. I am amazed and appalled by even sitcoms these days. We truly live in dark, dark times.
Really?
Really????
There are a lot of kinky and nasty heterosexuals out there too, so this is a pretty baseless article, though I agree with your key point. I can tolerate “normal” homosexuals, but effeminate, pansy and public gays really creep me out.
Perhaps the high rate of modern heterosexual winkage at homosexuality is because they hate to be stone throwers in glass houses.
I don’t know what the word for it is when a man has relations with a “flashlight” - but I *do* know that the man is a Democrat!
Agree! Absolutely!! And they recruit new victims to this sick way of life.
Your “normal” homos being those who keep their sexual shenanigans closeted and only hint at their loves.
No it’s not baseless to complain when you see figures like this for mass murderers. Refute the purported statistics if you can. But homos still mostly have most of America’s worst smut to themselves.
Homosexual sex is revolting. Why would any normal heterosexual want to visualize that like the article is doing? Hell, even imagining heterosexual sex is revolting... after all, considering the statistics, an average person is probably overweight bordering on obese.
The only sex that is not revolting to me is my own.
I find it completely that the liberals hate the economic 1% but absolutely support the sexual 1% and expect the rest of us to do so too.
Dante’s 8th circle is not a fun place.
Most likely true. There’s always been a multi-pronged approach to liberalism. Still, when I see TV shows (rare, haven’t had TV in a many years) and magazines (at the store), I’m shocked that people fill their heads with some of that stuff. At least in this area, the magazines are covered with a piece of black plastic (Not raunchy magazines, but things like Cosmo, etc.). What’s funny is that the stores recognize that most people don’t want to see that (at least be seen seeing it, in public), so they cover them, and yet there’s enough of a demand that they still carry them.
He claims, "Homosexuals make up less than 2% of the American population..." I don't know. I have heard 10% (don't have a link). At any rate, it's amazing that such a small minority of our population can have such a large affect.
Here's why:
At least in the beginning, we are seeking public desensitization and nothing more. We do not need and cannot expect a full "appreciation" or "understanding" of homosexuality from the average American. You can forget about trying to persuade the masses that homosexuality is a good thing. But if only you can get them to think that it is just another thing, with a shrug of their shoulders, then your battle for legal and social rights is virtually won. And to get to shoulder-shrug stage, gays as a class must cease to appear mysterious, alien, loathsome and contrary. A large-scale media campaign will be required in order to change the image of gays in America.
“Why would any normal heterosexual want to visualize that like the article is doing? “
Because that’s the truth of homosexuality, not the fun great ‘normal’ behavior they show on TV... and hiding from it results in the America we see today.
“and other objects”
____________________________________________________
Those would also include small rodents. No, I’m NOT kidding.
I should have made it clearer that I was commenting on the opening paragraph. I don’t disagree with many of the other points made.
No,because the homosexual lifestyle is one that is defined by
practices that by its inherent nature is insane.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.