BJ Clinton appointment. [check]
J.D. from the UC Berkeley School of Law [check]
'National Lawyers Guild' member - a leftist "shadow" ABA [check]
Legal aid and public defender in SF [check]
She looks butch-dykey. Is she?
DOMA does NOT violate any “equal protection”! EVERY adult in America has the right to marry ANY consenting partner of the opposite sex! The SAME rules apply to all. She never programmed a computer, I can tell!
From a constitutional standpoint, DOMA is unconstitutional because the federal government does not have the power to legislate on such a matter.
But of course, those elected in both parties feel the need for government to have its say in everything.
Without reading the article, I hope that the House’s legal defense team will be appealing this ludicrous decision.
Hey Claudia, what proof is there that defining marriage ITSELF is "rationally related to a legitimate government interest"?
Other, that is, than a tax definition?
Obvious Lesbian [check]
The National Lawyers' Guild is an old Stalinist front group -- they're as Communist as Communist gets. Many ties to William Kunstler and his foundation on the one hand, and the CPUSA on the other.
They're involved in the "Troofer" canards, and also in trying to get Bush and Cheney indicted and tried in The Hague in a Communist show trial.
She looks like a vagitarian.....
This reminds me of the old joke -— if you called a tail a leg, how many legs does a dog have? Answer: four - calling a tail a leg doesn’t make it so.
No judge has the power to change the definition of “marriage” — in fact, one of the reasons that Webster’s dictionary was created was to define the words used in the Constitution and laws passed by Congress.
If the people of a State or its legislature wish to pass a law enlarging the definition of “marriage” for the purposes of their state, I may disagree, but the 10th Amendment allows them to do so. But a Federal Judge has no such power.