Report: GOP might keep parts of ObamaCare if law is struck down

Hotair ^ | 05/17/2012 | AllahPundit

[svcw]

To the headline: of course they will.

[opentalk]

related:

Mark Levin calls out Boehner over plan to keep ‘popular’ parts of ObamaCare

Mark Levin is livid over a Politico article suggesting that Republicans are already planning to play politics and leave ‘popular, consumer friendly’ portions of Obamacare in place if the Supreme Court partially or fully overturns the law.

Levin says if this is true that Boehner needs to go

[GreaterSwiss]

f the law is partially or fully overturned they’ll draw up bills to keep the popular, consumer-friendly portions in place — like allowing adult children to remain on parents’ health care plans until age 26, and forcing insurance companies to provide coverage for people with pre-existing conditions. Ripping these provisions from law is too politically risky, Republicans say...

-The above two reasons will bankrupt health insurance companies. Anyone who votes for them should be kicked out of office.

A child is not 26!
Can I get in an autoaccident and then get insurance?

[trebb]

If the law is partially or fully overturned they’ll draw up bills to keep the popular, consumer-friendly portions in place — like allowing adult children to remain on parents’ health care plans until age 26, and forcing insurance companies to provide coverage for people with pre-existing conditions. Ripping these provisions from law is too politically risky, Republicans say...

[circlecity]

"they’ll draw up bills to keep the popular, consumer-friendly portions in place — like allowing adult children to remain on parents’ health care plans until age 26, and forcing insurance companies to provide coverage for people with pre-existing conditions."

This is impossible. You can't get rid of the individual mandate and still require Insurance Co.s to "insure" preexisting condition. Every insurance company would go bankrupt within a year. Nobody would buy insurance until they were sick or injured. Accepting a preexisting condition isn't insurance - its a subsidy.

[sickoflibs]

This post is what I referenced earlier without a link.

Let’s assume that this is simply an election year strategy to puts Dems on the defensive assuming that any house passed bills will die in the Senate, much like Reid is doing in the Senate to Republicans.

Then we still have to ask what Republicans would pass if they had control of both Houses (but under the 60 in the Senate) and Romney in the WH in 2013.

And Romney has also consistently said that he wants to keep the popular mandates in law just as Republican House leaders do, Those popular handout mandates are terrible policies but good politically (in the short term anyway.)

[Sirius Lee]

It’s okay. Boehner is going to hold Mitt’s feet to the fire and “force him to be Conservative.”

[apillar]

Don't worry! If elected Romney's first priority is going to be repealing Obamacare and replacing it with something conservatives will LOVE...Romneycare!...which actually is exactly the same as Obamacare...but conservatives should accept it and get on the bandwagon because Romney has a “R” after his name instead of a “D” and that makes all the difference! /sarcasm

[Sgt_Schultze]

Agreed. You cannot remove the lifetime cap on payouts while simultaneously requiring companies to cover individuals without regard for existing health concerns and expect anything but bankruptcy to result. Congress might as well mandate must cover without regard to existing circumstances with respect to homeowners insurance too. Who would pay before they needed coverage?

Regarding covering "children" up to 26 years old, In exchange for this mandate, the personal exemption on income taxes should revert to the parents under whose policy the "child" is covered. The excess insurance cost has surely shifted onto the parents policy.

[Diogenesis]

IT’S UNANIMOUS FOR RINO ROMNEY
From the Kennedy Seat in Massachusetts to the entire DNC

Mitt Romney wins much coveted Jimmy Carter endorsement

Gore Praises Romney's 'Climate Protection Plan'

Carville(D):
"It's a feel-good story, this Romney thing.
Romney is an ascendant guy."

Sen. John Kerry (D) to Don Imus on RomneyCARE:
"I like this health care bill".

Sen. Hillary Clinton (D) on RomneyCARE:
"To come up with a bipartisan plan in this polarized environment is commendable."

George Soros Wants Mitt Romney

---

[Yashcheritsiy]

"I expect Obama-Care will be overturned and rendered moot..."

Perhaps you should revise your estimation.

[MEGoody]

A child is not 26! Can I get in an autoaccident and then get insurance?

Amen and amen.

The one exception I can see with the "pre-existing condition" issue is when someone is forced to leave one plan and join another (i.e. is laid off from a job and then has to find their own insurance).

I completely agree that insurance companies should not be forced to take on someone who, for example, waits until they are diagnosed with cancer to purchase health insurance.

[cotton1706]

No! Repeal the whole damn thing. Then throw the signed repeal on Ted Kennedy’s grave!

[apillar]

...like allowing adult children to remain on parents’ health care plans until age 26...

Hey if we are going to redefine childhood to age 26 for insurance purposes, why stop there? Lets change the voting age to 26 and the smoking / drinking age to 26 as well. In fact why not add another mandatory school above high-school for ages 18-26. Of course mandatory curfews and driving restrictions would also apply.

I can hear the young adults screaming bloody murder already! But the fact is, you all shouldn't be able to have it both ways. If you want considered a child to stay on your parents insurance, then you should be considered a child in all other facets of your life as well.

[svcw]

Both of my daughters had finished their MBAs and owned their own homes while raising children - oh ye they had their own health insurance, car insurance, house insurance, life insurance......they were not children at 26, they were fully functioning adults.

[cymbeline]

“GOP might keep parts of ObamaCare ...”

The law as it stands has thousands of “parts”. Some are bound to be good.

Hopefully they’ll annhiliate the current law and create a new one from scratch rather than try to modify the current law.

[Perdogg]

The story came from Politico, so unless there is more sourcing I am going to treat it like a UFO siting.

[Yashcheritsiy]

Wait a second - I thought that all of the “no other choice” Freepers were telling us that surely, against all available evidence, Romney was going to take an axe to ObamaCare, and that if he didn’t, then the heroic GOP in Congress was going to hold his feet to the fire until he did.

You mean we got snookered again?

[kabar]

Obamacare is 2700 pages long. It is a catch-all bill with all types of issues involved. The Reps will have to come up with an alternative. Repeal and replace should be the motto.

Obamcare should be abolished completely and the Reps should not indicate in any way that they will try to salvage and revise it. It doesn't make good sense, politically or otherwise. Their alternative could address those with pre-existing conditions, health care coverage for "children," etc. I have no doubt that the Reps would like to get rid of the Medicare Advantage programs as is the case with Obamacare, which cuts $500 billion from Medicare.

And the Reps could highlight what will be gained with the repeal of Obamacare including the costs and the elimination of the death panels.