What Mitt Romney Hasn't Done...

Rush Limbaugh.com ^ | May 11, 2012 | Rush Limbaugh, com

[little jeremiah]

My view is that we fight Romney vigorously to send the delegates and other Rs at the convention the message that WE’RE MAD AS HELL AND NOT GOING TAKE IT (disgusting establishment RINOs) ANY MORE!!!

Then, if they don’t get the message, people can support Romeny if they want.

But NOT until then. It is not over yet. If we give up pre-emptively with a “sigh, I guess we’ll have to swallow our vomit and vote for the lesser of two evils YET AGAIN...” they’ll think they can stuff him down our gullets. Giving up the fight at this point is assisting the establishment traitors.

[netmilsmom]

>>But NOT until then.<<

Amen.

[little jeremiah]

Hugs all around.

Nothing is carved in stone yet...

[netmilsmom]

:-)

[RedMonqey]

My view is that we fight Romney vigorously to send the delegates and other Rs at the convention the message that WE’RE MAD AS HELL AND NOT GOING TAKE IT

I'm with you about getting rid of "Weak Willed Willie"

The next question is "who's going to replace him?"

[little jeremiah]

Palin/West, Palin/Newt. I’m sure some others might fill in the blank space.

[little jeremiah]

What is needed:

1. Courage
2. Personal moral principles
3. Understanding and adherence to Constitutional governance of a SMALL federal government
4. NOT a DC/GOP insider
5. A track record of going after corruption - in BOTH parties
6. Not a craven lickspittle who quivers in front of the media OR Dems or RINOs

The only person I can think of offhand is Palin, although I am sure there are others. But they are not DC insiders. We need FRESH people in DC - all levels - who are not DC/GOP establishment cess pool inhabitants.

[RedMonqey]

I would love a Palin/Newt or Newt/Palin

Newt is very good when he “keeps on message”
The only problem is “Keeping Newt on message”

And Palin adds zest and vigor to the ticket.
The only thing that bothers me about her is she resigned before her term was over (understandable though)
Must admit I don't know much about West except a few headlines where he p#ssed off all the right people.

A good start anyway..... ;-)

[Yosemitest]

You can't take the fact that Stinking Liberal Romney is a LOSER, who will NEVER get the base to vote for him.
I hope that the Republican Convention is a brokered convention, and we, the base, kick the crap out of the "Establishment" and all their losers!

[af_vet_rr]

Exactly, because Romney has an 'R' next to his name, even though his record declares him to be a pretend Republican.

Maybe we should start saying Mitt Romney (P) as in pretend Republican!

[af_vet_rr]

It’s pretty clear to most people with 1/2 a brain that Obama’s “evolution” on gay marriage is just bs. We know that either 1. he always favored it and was lying before or even possibly 2. he does not in fact favor it and is lying now or maybe even more likely 3. he doesn’t really care one way or the other but as you say is just playing both sides.

I agree completely that it's bs. I really think this is meant to be some kind of distraction. Obama supporters have already sold their souls to the devil, and Obama "evolving" is not going to change their minds at all. If anything, they are going to claim Romney "devolved" since he used to be a big supporter of gay "rights" and even hired some gay Republicans for his staff.

I imagine we are going to hear more about Bain Capital and also Mormonism.

There will be plenty on Mormonism. When you get into what the people who made up Mormonism were claiming, when you get into the fact that the Mormons discriminated against blacks until the late 1970s, yeah there is plenty of fodder there.

Willard will be called out on his being in his 30s and being a member of a "church" that discriminated against blacks. Make no mistake. It's like people going after George W. Bush losing his license for drunk driving when he was 30, only this time it will stick.

But the most damming thing the media has on Romney is Romney's record. Romney governed as a liberal and acted like a liberal. He only started to pretend being anything but a liberal when he realized he was going to lose re-election and when he started thinking about the White House.

The GOP is making a huge mistake in supporting somebody even more liberal than John McCain. A huge mistake.

[mojitojoe]

I hope that the Republican Convention is a brokered convention, and we, the base, kick the crap out of the “Establishment” and all their losers!
__________________________________
So do I, that would be WONDERFUL. If that doesn’t happen, I will vote for the Republican candidate. If it’s Romney, he has my vote in November. ABO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[Yosemitest]

I understand your position.
But I will NOT tolerate the "Establishment Republicans" any longer.
I can NOT. I WILL not.
As long as we keep playing the LOSERS game, they will keep playing us like fools.
I will NOT.
"Establishment Republicans", are happier NOT being responsible ...

It ain't over ... till it's over.
We don't have to chose, until our time comes to chose.
I'm going to do the best I can with the time I have, to expose Willard for the RINO he is.
But I will not support a RINO, no matter what!
The "Establishment Republicans" are a worse enemy than the Communists, because they tear us down from the inside.


We have to vote for who we want to vote for, and ignore the LAME Stream Media's constant drumming for LOSER MITT.
They want MITT because he's the easiest to defeat.
Look what Rush said (5th paragraph from the end) about what the "Establishment Republicans" think Mitt's chances are.

" But let me just close this out by saying
the Democrats have insisted for 75 years that Social Security is an insurance program
that you are contributing a percentage of your paycheck into your own account,
which is part of a trust fund, to pay for your retirement benefit.
It is not, they insist, it is not welfare,
it is not an entitlement program.
It is insurance.
They've told us this for 75 years.
Like an annuity program.

Meanwhile, every argument they are making now strips bare the big lie that they've been telling for 75 years.
If this payroll tax cut is a tax cut, then Social Security is not an insurance program.
And yet we're gonna run around and let them have it both ways
because we're afraid of the optics
or we're afraid because Obama's African-American?
Is it a welfare or entitlement program
and the money people are having withheld from their paychecks
is not an insurance contribution, then it's a tax. Pure and simple.
But they've sold this as an insurance program
and all of a sudden now we're cutting taxes on this program?
It's a welfare or entitlement program.
The money people are having withheld from their paychecks is not an insurance contribution, [it's] a tax, that's what they're telling us now?
Okay, then you are being taxed to pay for somebody else's retirement.
Now, the fact that the Republican establishment cannot make that case and other arguments
tells me that they may have already surrendered,
and this is a big difference between us and the establishment.
They're in this defensive posture, I've told you,
I said on Greta how many times,

a lot of people inside the Republican establishment secretly don't even believe Obama can be beaten.
And that's why they want Romney,
'cause they think at least Romney will help 'em take the Senate.
He'll lose less down the ballot than Gingrich or some conservative will.
But conservatives, you Tea Party activists, you don't want to give up
and you haven't given up,
and you don't want to accept this propaganda from the left.
We insist on challenging it, we insist on fighting it
'cause there's no other way to save the country,
and continually playing these games
letting the Democrats rewrite the language, change the definition of things,
get away with false accusations against us, never do anything about it,
constantly stay on defense. "

Read the following:

Newt Supporters Aren't Swayed, January 26, 2012

The GOP Establishment in Abject Panic: They Don't Understand Their Own Base

Newt is a Vessel: He Won South Carolina Because He Articulated Conservatism

Newsmax/InsiderAdvantage Poll: Gingrich Man to Beat, Tuesday, 29 Nov 2011 04:20 PM

However, we must stand up and loudly say

"WE SUPPORT NEWT, OR SANTORUM!
HE CAN BEAT OBAMA SO BADLY ... , IT'LL BE THE SHOW OF THE CENTURY"

Newt and Santorum ran out of money, because the "Establishment Republicans" lied about them, and drowned them out with negative ads.
So let the "Establishment Republicans" fall flat on their faces. I won't tolerate them!

It'll be a fight against the "Establishment Republicans" to the very end, and it may even go into a Brokered Convention.

Like Ronald Reagan said:

" We must go forth from here united,
determined that what a great general said a few years ago is true:
" There is no substitute for victory, Mr. President. " "

How many times has the "Republican Establishment" treated us to one lecture after the other on the need for “compromise” and “patience.”?
After we elect and RE-elect the "Republican Establishment", they conduct themselves with none of the confidence and enthusiasm with which they expressed themselves on the campaign trail.
It may be worth it for the GOP to lose some elections - if it means that conservatives—and the country—will ultimately win.

If we didn’t know it before, WE ... the Tea Partiers, now knows that accepting short-term loss in exchange for long-term gain is the essence of compromise, the essence of politics.

Ironically, we can thank the "Republican Establishment" for impressing this so indelibly upon us!!! I'm fresh out of "patience", and I'm not in the mood for "compromise".
"COMPROMISE" to me is a dirty word.
Let the RINO's compromise their values, with the conservatives, for a change.


Now the "Republican Establishment's" hatred for conservatives is well known.
Jon Bershad wrote about Rush's analysis of their PANIC.

My dislike for the Democratic Party is second to none.
But my ... LOATHING ... for the "Establishment Republicans" ... is even stronger!
The "Establishment Republicans" can go to hell!