Posted on 05/08/2012 4:04:43 PM PDT by lbryce
There is WAY too much information in that article. It seems like the government and the New York Times are competing to see who has the biggest mouth and who can endanger the greatest number of Americans.
So... are we then to assume that the New York Times has once again blown the cover of a CIA asset, potentially putting the lives of our intelligence operatives at risk?
That's OK, the TSA will be glad to do careful strip searches of every man, woman, and child. But they need to have their budget increased so they can hire another million employees, easing the unemployment situation. The economy will benefit and travelers will be even safer. Thank you, Barack Obama!
I still don’t believe this story. So made up; just another story to get another vote. Truth has nothing to do with this administration.
Yesterday the gun 'hidden' in stuffed animals, today the custom-fitted underwear bombs.
TSA justification for existence tales, meant to convince the weak-minded that surrendering rights for 'safety' is a good idea.
Oh...you mean the same country that 15 of the 19 terrorist involved in 9/11 were from?
He's a double agent, all right. The question is for WHO?
1984 = 2012
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.