Posted on 05/01/2012 3:47:14 AM PDT by Kaslin
I’m not defending this woman at all, but I am curious, did she do this with the intent to harm, or was she so ignorant that she figured Chlorine will kill the infection and cheaper than meds?
If she knew fully well that what she was doing and was doing it to harm, there may not be a level of hell bad enough for her. IF this is an incident of ingorant behavior, it will not restore her daughter’s sight, but it was not done with the intent of harm.
Time will tell what is going on with this, and no its not beyond the pale someone could be so cruel to their own child intentionally, but I want to hear more than what we are seeing here.
will the child ever be able to see?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.