Posted on 04/28/2012 11:14:17 PM PDT by nickcarraway
That double standard, has existed, and will continue to exist, until the American people demand a higher ethical standard from the media elites.
What's your game plan? Any insights the rest of us might have missed? (You're right about the Finnish Sniper... in an 'end of the world' situation, we wouldn't even have the advantage the fins had - they had police protection...)
Now that “survivalists” are called “preppers” shouldn’t “survivalist” mean something like “private school kid.”
I heard drinking pool water was a no - no... Anyone know??
I hold that America is based on individual responsibility, with the exercise of that responsibility defined by the Constitution.
However, any ‘plan’ is based upon the level of, and the cause of, the situation. A major bolide strike, major earthquake with tsunamis, super volcano eruption, or other natural disaster is one thing.
Bio, chem or EMP attacks are another. But one may assume those attacks would result in a coalescing of the public. Some rioting may occur in the ‘Big Sh*tty areas, but faced with an threat from without, people tend to support the “in-group” against the “out-group”.
Bio, chem or nuking, followed by SHTF level societal disintegration is another scenario entirely.
Personally, I have the ability to sustain myself and my friends and protect against anything but a military attack. Prepare as best you can.
In all cases, I will remember that the Republic is worth fighting for. Know who the enemies of the Republic really are. IMHO, they are Muslims, commies, enviros, and anyone who wishes to impose a socialist solution on any problem.
mark for later
bookmark for later read
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.