Posted on 04/09/2012 7:26:51 PM PDT by lbryce
This article I believe is a case in point where the shrill tone up a few notches is quite palpable.
I was thinking that it might even be true that economic growth have been the greatest under the Democrats and that is simply because of the time lag for laws passed by previous Republican administrations to begin flourishing.
and when the Democrats are not in power they do everything they can to sabotage all and everything
This is the same Goldman Sucks that refers to its clients as “Moppets”? Right ... a lot of faith in those clowns.
“Muppets”
but be a frugal conservative, concerned how much debt we are giving our little ones, and somehow that is not growth....
BS data from a BS news paper....
but be a frugal conservative, concerned how much debt we are giving our little ones, and somehow that is not growth....
BS data from a BS news paper....
Also the same “Sucks” that seems to always have places to work for old Donks and GOPe types.
By “most conservative outcome” Goldman-Sachs means “we’re on the take”.
Thanks lbryce.
Obama needs to be dumped now along with those cowards in Congress.
We’re deepest in National debt we’ve ever been and our currency has never been worth less...
I’d say stock performance and GDP are meaningless at this point when not weighted against those two factors...
There were plenty of “ millionaires” in Zimbabwe at one point... Of course, this meant they could afford a loaf of bread...
People tend to vote republican when things are going bad, to fix it. Then when it is fixed, they tend to vote democrat to get more free stuff.
Still, they have chosen a rather small period, and a skewed one. Why start at 1940? Because it eliminates 8 years of depression under a democratic president and democratic congress.
And I think GDP growth was relatively high when we were experiencing high inflation under Carter.
think that Bill Clinton would strongly disagree with this article that states the economy growth was the least when there was a democrat President and Republican controlled Congress. Don't we always here liberals telling us about the great economy during the Clinton Presidency? Who was controlling Congress in 6 out of 8 years in the Clinton Presidency? Yeah, the Republicans...
here=hear
The pie has grown a little. The number of people expecting a piece of the pie has grown quite a bit.
The number of people making the pie has shrunk.
And that, in a nutshell, is it.
BINGO! Let’s review...
when the Democrats are not in power they do everything they can to sabotage all and everything.
when the Democrats are not in power they do everything they can to sabotage all and everything.
when the Democrats are not in power they do everything they can to sabotage all and everything.
when the Democrats are not in power they do everything they can to sabotage all and everything.
How many Obama dollars has Goldman Sachs received? Just sayin..
I can believe it, there is a time lag of four to eight
years before an economy feels the effects of
administration.
Clinton is alway spoken of as having a great economy,
but it was because of Reagan policies, nothing clintigula
did.
Likewise this administration has kept it’s foot on
the throat of the economy by it’s insane spending
and regulation that it’s a wonder it all hasn’t
collapsed.
The writer cannot even get that right, so anything after that is BS.
Before, too. :-)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.