Posted on 04/05/2012 12:51:05 PM PDT by SmithL
Perhaps the company should have anticipated these problems and wired every truck — I think legally any employer can surveil the workplace. Just knowing they were under surveillance would probably have put these “training” drivers on their best behavior.
“The more Gov’t “helps” women, the more incentive employers have to simply hire men for the same job.”
Also, as large corporations simply become quasi-government agencies with their social policies, etc. tied to government contracts, smaller firms often have few enough employees to avoid many regulations, allowing them to hire the best employees without regard for token representation and such.
this is really about shutting down the class action collective suits the government uses for shock and awe. Claims SHOULD be investigated INDIVIDUALLY.
Individual claims prevent “consent decrees” where a company submits to the jurisdiction of the unelected pencil pushers.
the premise of class actions is that ONE anecdote means ALL are similarly situated. What if it turns out this woman is lying? does that mean a class action case exists because “all men are pigs” doctrine?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.