Posted on 03/29/2012 9:49:13 AM PDT by MNDude
ok lets say it was a bad shoot, how would you find an impartial jury at this point?
Now this kid will be “taken care of” Thanks liberal press !
Despicable.
If they did that to my kid the reporter who uttered his name would get a visit from me.
How disgusting. I hope ABC gets put out of business and all assets transferred to this kids family because of this.
I would be interested to know what racial group Austin Brown belongs to. In any case, it is a DISASTER for ABC to release his name. He is a minor child, and now his life won’t be worth living and he’ll have to be in hiding, possibly for years. Madness! If I were in the position of Austin’s parents I’d sue the hindquarters off of ABC.
It is just despicable that they would name this 13 year old. His parents should lawyer up, NOW!
Austin Brown had better not be white. If so, he’s screwed.
Austin Brown had better not be black. If so, he’s screwed.
Austin Brown had better not be Hispanic. If so, he’s screwed.
Austin Brown had better not be.......
There’s nothing in this story to indicate it was a bad shoot.
In fact there’s nothing in this story except the name of a 13 year old and an eyewitness account that Zimmerman was in fact bleeding and laying in the grass before a gunshot was heard, which contradicts ABC News propaganda and a handful of idiot freepers around here.
ABC reporter that did this story is SENI TIENABESO? Can you guess his race?
http://www.linkedin.com/pub/seni-tienabeso/4/5b3/5bb
“In fact there’s nothing in this story except the name of a 13 year old and an eyewitness account that Zimmerman was in fact bleeding and laying in the grass before a gunshot was heard”
And that’s why his name was released. Anyone that is on the “wrong side” in the eyes of the lamestream media is entitled to no protection.
Someone will get to that 13 year old kid....the old “don’t snitch” routine.The kid will either vanish (as in be hidden) or he’ll change his story 180 degrees.
I hope that network ends up having to pay the family ALOT of money. Endangering a 13year olds life to further their own lies....Is there no point so low a liberal won’t sink?
This is absolutely putting a child's life in danger.
FUABC
Supposedly, ABC was granted consent from the mother of this child..she was present during the interview & also contributed to the story.
Knowing how highly charged this is, I don’t know anyone in their right mind that would consent to releasing their childs’ name to this story..maybe $$$?
A minor can't testify in court anyway, can he? Which would mean the girl-friend's testimony would be worthless as well. (Which is probably is anyway.) I think you have to be 18 or older to take an oath—and to be prosecuted for lying if they catch you in a lie.
I'd say publicizing the name is an effort to punish a witness—for heresy. Just like Spike Lee publicizing the old couple's address when he thought it was Zimmerman's.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.