Skip to comments.
Face-off over fracking
Marketwatch ^
| March 22, 2012, 1:44 PM
| Russ Britt
Posted on 03/22/2012 12:01:18 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-36 next last
To: BOBTHENAILER; TigerLikesRooster; landsbaum; Signalman; NormsRevenge; steelyourfaith; ...
Enviroweenies getting desperate.....
2
posted on
03/22/2012 12:04:10 PM PDT
by
Ernest_at_the_Beach
(The Global Warming HOAX is about Global Governance)
To: Cincinatus' Wife
3
posted on
03/22/2012 12:06:42 PM PDT
by
Ernest_at_the_Beach
(The Global Warming HOAX is about Global Governance)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
desperate because they are gonna turn Pennsylvania and Ohio into deep red states if they try and eff this up
To: Buckeye McFrog; All
There is a vidoe link of T. boone Pickens and former Penn Gov Ed Randell at the link....
Seeing some stuff in the comments also.
5
posted on
03/22/2012 12:25:02 PM PDT
by
Ernest_at_the_Beach
(The Global Warming HOAX is about Global Governance)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
This gally doesn’t know my friend Jack...
To: Buckeye McFrog
California won't have enough energy to power it's electric cars.
This isn't about the environment. It's about Control and Domination. It's about the next dictatorship and the enslavement of a formerly free people.
7
posted on
03/22/2012 12:34:04 PM PDT
by
sr4402
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
I see the RiverGroup org is out of NY state.
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
From the comments:
*********************************EXCERPT**************************************
Shawn Holt
The debate needs to be re-framed. the debate should not be whether fracking is worth the environmental cost, it should be about how we can improve the environmental profile fracking. Look at what companies like GasFrac (www.gasfrac.com / GSFVF) are doing. They don't even use water and claim your 100% recovery using gel propane.this is a fantastic opportunity for innovation; doing what America does best.
9
posted on
03/22/2012 12:42:02 PM PDT
by
Ernest_at_the_Beach
(The Global Warming HOAX is about Global Governance)
To: Marine_Uncle
Probably some Bankers behind them ..still hoping for trading Carbon Credits....
10
posted on
03/22/2012 12:47:09 PM PDT
by
Ernest_at_the_Beach
(The Global Warming HOAX is about Global Governance)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
But Paul Gallay, president of the environmental group Riverkeeper, challenged Cohen and Aubrey McClendon, chairman of Chesapeake Energy Gallay says countless environmental hazards are involved. He said there were high amounts of benzine in the air around the Fort Worth, Texas, area, where fracking has been taking place. There also have been problems in the air in parts of Colorado, where there are five times the number of pollutants compared with the national average.I guess that since their claims of groundwater contamination have been completely discredited, they have to move on to claims about air pollution.
11
posted on
03/22/2012 12:51:15 PM PDT
by
dirtboy
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
the debate should not be whether fracking is worth the environmental cost,What environmental cost does he refer to? He cites higher than normal levels in areas where no background levels were established.
Parts of Colorado have significant exposures of oil shale at the surface, and that could be the source, despite production of oil and gas from deeper formations.
The presumption that 'natural' is completely pure and all else is due to human activity is often incorrect.
12
posted on
03/22/2012 1:00:25 PM PDT
by
Smokin' Joe
(How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing)
To: Smokin' Joe
They want the EPA to shut it all down...it's all snake oil they say...it's not natural Gas....they say.,....
What a bunch of crackpots.
See the related thread at link #3 above....for more about what civilization is doing to OUR ENVIRONMENT.
13
posted on
03/22/2012 1:23:10 PM PDT
by
Ernest_at_the_Beach
(The Global Warming HOAX is about Global Governance)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
From the National Review....see link at post #3...link to Fr thread.
14
posted on
03/22/2012 2:13:26 PM PDT
by
Ernest_at_the_Beach
(The Global Warming HOAX is about Global Governance)
To: Marine_Uncle
15
posted on
03/22/2012 2:27:59 PM PDT
by
TigersEye
(Life is about choices. Your choices. Make good ones.)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
I am a manager for an oilfield services company in Pennsylvania, working on the Marcellus/Utica shale.
There is no amount of evidence, fact or logic that will every convince most environmentalists that stimulation is safe and does not contaminate well water.
This is domestic energy, produced by American workers who earn above-average wages ($30K more than PA average). This is clean energy.
Chesapeake Energy just had over $300,000 damage to a tank liner from environmentalists. If there had been fluid in there, it would have been a spill to be blamed on the industry.
Numerous oilfield services trucks have been vandalized by environmentalists. Drivers are reporting multiple attempts at running them off the road by cars swerving at them.
These environmentalists are the racists of the 21st Century. Like those racists of the past, they are blinded by their hatred and see the industry and its workers as sub-human. They have no reluctance to cause injury or death.
16
posted on
03/22/2012 2:35:04 PM PDT
by
Erik Latranyi
(When religions have to beg the gov't for a waiver, we are already under socialism.)
To: Erik Latranyi
Not surprised....listen to the ( or read the text) last of the Audio where the environmentalists get discussed.
17
posted on
03/22/2012 3:20:58 PM PDT
by
Ernest_at_the_Beach
(The Global Warming HOAX is about Global Governance)
To: Erik Latranyi
See link to thread at post #3 for thread with the National Review article.
18
posted on
03/22/2012 3:23:49 PM PDT
by
Ernest_at_the_Beach
(The Global Warming HOAX is about Global Governance)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
RiverkeeperCommie Kennedy's bunch.
19
posted on
03/22/2012 3:39:04 PM PDT
by
facedown
(Armed in the Heartland)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
I wouldn’t want to argue with that hypothesis. I would probably lose. :)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-36 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson