Skip to comments.
Indiana: Dick Lugar Ruled Ineligible to Vote
Roll Call ^
| March 15, 2012
| Kyle Trygstad
Posted on 03/15/2012 11:06:48 AM PDT by Clintonfatigued
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-64 next last
To: Clintonfatigued
Dicks shouldn’t be allowed to vote anyway.
To: Clintonfatigued; All
When is Lugar’s Senate primary election?
To: crosshairs; Kartographer
“Dicks shouldnt be allowed to vote anyway.”
There is a lawsuit from some Indiana citizens about that, as well.
43
posted on
03/15/2012 12:29:29 PM PDT
by
Clintonfatigued
(A chameleon belongs in a pet store, not the White House)
To: justiceseeker93; SoldierDad; A. Morgan
“When is Lugars Senate primary election?”
It’s May 8.
44
posted on
03/15/2012 12:32:07 PM PDT
by
Clintonfatigued
(A chameleon belongs in a pet store, not the White House)
To: Kaslin; SunkenCiv; Red Steel; Lauren BaRecall
This is priceless. Indeed, Richard Lugar’s residency problems can be seen as a symbol of everything that is wrong with Congressional politics today.
45
posted on
03/15/2012 12:35:16 PM PDT
by
Clintonfatigued
(A chameleon belongs in a pet store, not the White House)
To: wordsofearnest
I left Indiana in 79.
Have not voted there since I left.
I only returned for my parents, since last May they are gone.
My shadow will not darken that state again.
They cannot even afford corn.
46
posted on
03/15/2012 12:44:22 PM PDT
by
hadaclueonce
(you are paying 12% more for fuel because of Ethanol. Smile big Corn Lobby,)
To: GeronL; Cincinatus' Wife; Cicero
This will defenitely hurt RINO Lugar in the Republican primary, and perhaps the general election as well.
47
posted on
03/15/2012 12:49:37 PM PDT
by
Clintonfatigued
(A chameleon belongs in a pet store, not the White House)
To: Clintonfatigued
Always knew there was something about Dick. My dad did some work for him back in the 70’s when he was Mayor of Indy. His campaign guy?? Mitch Daniels. And Dick can’t say he forgot. He has a photographic memory.
48
posted on
03/15/2012 12:50:40 PM PDT
by
halfright
(Just a serf in the Kingdom of Zero)
To: Clintonfatigued
The entire Congress needs to be assessed and fumigated.
To: JimSEA
So, if Lugars address was invalid when he last ran, he has been illegally serving and can be immediately removed. Is that the point of the Democrats holding?? The Senate is the final judge of its own members' qualifications (Art. I, sec. 5, cl. 1), and the Senate seated Lugar, so he can't be removed. I assume this was to embarass him when he runs for re-election.
To: sonofagun
Here’s another thread. Richard Lugar has been claiming a false address for some time and is not eligible to vote in his own primary.
The primary is on May 8. I hope you vote for Richard Mourdock that day.
http://www.richardmourdock.com/1977/
51
posted on
03/15/2012 1:01:49 PM PDT
by
Clintonfatigued
(A chameleon belongs in a pet store, not the White House)
To: Clintonfatigued; AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; bigheadfred; Bockscar; ColdOne; ...
Heh heh...
Of course, we shouldn’t laugh too much, many of us may be denied our voting rights in November.
Thanks Clintonfatigued.
52
posted on
03/15/2012 4:46:01 PM PDT
by
SunkenCiv
(I come to bury Caesar, not to praise him.)
To: smoothsailing
Mourdock, the state Treasurer, would be the prohibitive favorite in November against Congressman Donnelley.
53
posted on
03/15/2012 5:14:45 PM PDT
by
AuH2ORepublican
(If a politician won't protect innocent babies, what makes you think that he'll protect your rights?)
To: AuH2ORepublican
Joe Donnelly is only running because he barely won in 2010 and redistricting moved the district east, dooming his reelection prospects. He might not even campaign actively if Lugar wins the primary.
54
posted on
03/15/2012 5:30:58 PM PDT
by
Clintonfatigued
(A chameleon belongs in a pet store, not the White House)
To: Clintonfatigued
I know why he's running for the Senate instead of for reelection (the IN-02 went from being less Republican than IN as a whole to more Republican than IN as a whole), but I disagree that he won't campaign actively if Lugar gets renominated. While I don't doubt that Donnelly thinks that Lugar would be nearly impossible to beat, but that he'd have a chance against Mourdock, that doesn't mean that Donnelly would forgo the opportunity to campaign strongly statewide because (i) one never knows and (ii) it would help him for a future statewide run. (And, for the record, I don't think that Donnelly’s odds against Mourdock would be all that hot, either.)
55
posted on
03/15/2012 5:39:21 PM PDT
by
AuH2ORepublican
(If a politician won't protect innocent babies, what makes you think that he'll protect your rights?)
To: Clintonfatigued
56
posted on
03/15/2012 5:56:19 PM PDT
by
Stymee
(Father of 7)
To: Lazlo in PA; Cletus.D.Yokel
If Lugar voted in Indiana, then it appears he also committed a fraud.
To: Clintonfatigued; Impy; BillyBoy; AuH2ORepublican; randita
If Lugar is not considered eligible to vote, he should be disqualified as a candidate since this would mean he is not a resident of IN. If by some dreadful chance he wins renomination, Mourdock should sue to have him removed from the ballot (perhaps he should now).
To: fieldmarshaldj; Clintonfatigued; Impy; BillyBoy; randita
The sole residency requirement for U.S. Senators and Representatives in the U.S. Constitution is that the person be an inhabitant of the state *when he is elected*. There are state laws, of questionable constitutionality, that impose longer residency requirements for U.S. congressional candidates; I don’t know what Indiana law provides, but surely Lugar can establish residency before the primary, not to mention far before the election.
Lugar’s residency kerfuffle is a great political issue, but a lousy legal issue. Mourdock should just keep hammering away at Lugar for being out of touch, not conservative enough and a Beltway insider, and beat him in the primary, or else we’ll be stuck with Lugar for 6 more years.
59
posted on
03/15/2012 8:19:58 PM PDT
by
AuH2ORepublican
(If a politician won't protect innocent babies, what makes you think that he'll protect your rights?)
To: fieldmarshaldj; AuH2ORepublican; Impy; GOPsterinMA; randita; BillyBoy; indiana; LdSentinal
This could be what enables Richard Mourdock to break through. So often, it’s the local and parochial issues that cause turnover more than national trends.
60
posted on
03/15/2012 9:05:21 PM PDT
by
Clintonfatigued
(A chameleon belongs in a pet store, not the White House)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-64 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson