AG Van Hollen has said he'll appeal.
Another judge that should be demoted to working at subway.
That surely doesn't mean any impostor that can schlep in to a voting booth, does it?
All the Voter I.D. is to make certain that the voter is a U.S. Citizen and has the right to vote.
The Constitution did say “Citizens”. And we are trying to make certain. !
So what’s wrong with that?
WTH is going on in this country?
Seriously.
That's not coincidental at all.
Now there’s a judge begging for an opportunity to explain to his employer’s, We the People, just how and where he gets off participating in disenfranchising them of their vote!!
BTW...here’s how the adults north and south of us handle this issue..
Here’s How Canada Verifies...
http://www.elections.ca/content.aspx?section=vot&dir=ids&document=index&lang=e
and Mexico
.here’s how they deal with voter fraud issues south of the border....and ..its all you need to know about the treasonous, malignant American Left....
“...the Mexican Voter I.D. card has NINE security characteristics, including a fingerprint, a photograph, watermarks and holograms. What is more, in Mexico, the lists of electors that are distributed to political parties include the photo and the full name and address of the electors.”
http://www.electionsquebec.qc.ca/english/news-detail.php?id=609
and if WE don’t start doing so..there is very little incentive to continue to “voluntarily” support the Feds every April 15th.
The Communists aren’t going down without a fight.
This ruling will add significance to the bill moving through the Minnesota legislature right now. It will amend the state constitution to require voter ID, and is favored by over 80% of the polled voters.
Can Holder believe he’s going to overrule a state’s constitution? The line must be drawn soon.
From the article:
“Flanagan determined Wisconsin’s voter ID law was the most restrictive in the country based on testimony from Ken Mayer, a University of Wisconsin-Madison political science professor. Mayer has estimated there are more than 220,000 Wisconsin residents who do not have photo IDs but who are otherwise qualified to vote.”
From here: http://gab.wi.gov/elections-voting/statistics
Wisconsin has 3,493,711 registered voters. 6.3% of those voters are registered, but don’t have IDs.
From here: http://gab.wi.gov/elections-voting/voters/registration-voting
Proof of Residence
The following constitute acceptable Proof-of-Residence if the document contains your current name and address and is valid on Election Day (unless otherwise indicated):
A current and valid Wisconsin driver license.
A current and valid Wisconsin identification card.
Any other official identification card or license issued by a Wisconsin governmental body or unit.
Any identification card issued by an employer in the normal course of business and bearing a photo of the card holder, but not including a business card.
A real estate tax bill or receipt for the current year or the year preceding the date of the election.
A residential lease which is effective for a period that includes election day (NOT for first-time voters registering by mail).
A university, college or technical institute identification card (must include photo), ONLY if the bearer provides a fee receipt dated within the last nine months or the institution provides a certified housing list to the municipal clerk.
A gas, electric or telephone service statement (utility bill) for the period commencing not earlier than 90 days before election day.
Bank statement.
Paycheck.
A check or other document issued by a unit of government.
This just happened to Texas’ new law, too. By the Marxist Obamanation administration, though.
And yes, our AG is taking it to court as well.
Absolute garbage. There is nothing stopping anyone citizen from getting a photo ID, so requiring one does nothing to stop anyone from voting.
This is clearly about enabling voter fraud, which is a demographic that always favors the Democrats, but everyone here knew that anyway.
Here's a question for all of you legal experts out there. Is there any way the governor and legislators can bypass this ruling and proceed with requiring photo IDs to vote?
What?
Wisconsin Voter ID Temporary Injunction Made Permanent!
FReep Mail me if you want on, or off, this Wisconsin interest ping list.
Arrrrrrrggggghhhhhhhh!
why not just copy word for word the law that the USSC has upheld?
This is already decided law. Voter ID is constitutional.
Bastard liberals! I hate every single one of them. I hope that Walker & the AG put an all-out court press to get this expedited to the Wisc Supreme Court... 4 conservatives to 3 libturds. Plus I thought the USSCOTUS already ruled in favor of photo ID voting requirements?
“Trust but verify.” - Ronald Reagan
Why is it Unconstitutional to demand Phot I.D. when Voting?
but we are all required by Federal Law to present a Photo I.D. when seeing our Doctors and attempting to get all other Medical Attention????????????? Oh, I got it!!!
The Demorats beleive they couldn’t get all the Illegal Votes they depend on in an ethical Fair environment!!!
We’re in the middle of a revolution, that’s the actual problem.
So, do these judges feel the same about buying a gun? When will they strike down the requirement to show ID to buy one at a gun store? Or do we have double standards by idiot justices on Civil Rights?
Well? all I’m hearing is crickets from the left...