Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

FBI director: Have to check whether targeted killing rule is outside US only.
Fox News ^ | March 07, 2012 | | Catherine Herridge

Posted on 03/08/2012 2:53:22 AM PST by Carriage Hill

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-52 last
To: carriage_hill

I posted to point out the casual dismiss they have been using of the Constitution


41 posted on 03/08/2012 7:19:02 AM PST by SF_Redux (Sarah stands for accountablility and personal responsiblity, democrats can't live with that)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Nifster

I’m thinking so, too, but we’ll have to wait for the “official findings” BS, won’t we?


42 posted on 03/08/2012 7:38:24 AM PST by Carriage Hill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee

I will, T. BTW, I have your signed books and have read/re-read 2x: awesome, sir.


43 posted on 03/08/2012 7:40:14 AM PST by Carriage Hill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Vinnie

That’s what it appears to be. US Citizen-Patriots just get killed; no charges, trial etc.


44 posted on 03/08/2012 7:42:16 AM PST by Carriage Hill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: carriage_hill

yup for what they will be worth...


45 posted on 03/08/2012 8:10:30 AM PST by Nifster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Nifster

You can be sure it’ll be a very *sanitized* report we’ll finally get.


46 posted on 03/08/2012 8:34:10 AM PST by Carriage Hill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: carriage_hill

There are a few things about this targeted killing that are troublesome. First, as I read Holder’s three points, it is not necessary that the target actually commits a crime. In the Fort Hood example, Al Awaki (sp?) arguably gave sermons that inspired the shooter. Think how the DOJ could use this definition combined with an assertion that it’s unlikely that the individual be captured to assassinate most any conservative poster who advocates some type of immediate government change (throw the bum out). It’s a far different criteria the resisting a lawful arrest, resisting officers serving a lawful search warrant. Now I’m talking about the legal standard not the abuses that frequently happen.

IMO this gives a free pass for purely political assassinations.


47 posted on 03/08/2012 8:41:39 AM PST by JimSEA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JimSEA
There are a few things about this targeted killing that are troublesome.

Most troubling is that it is blatantly against the spirit and words of the Constitution. There are no exceptions in the due process clause for guys who go jihadist. Firefight? Waste them. Exigent circumstance? Two to center mass.

But planned assasinations of "terrorists" who are American citizens based on one man's approval? I think not.

Even trying them in absentia would at least be some sort of dure process if they refuse extradition.

I mean Obama killed a 16 year old American citizen, al Awaki's son, with a drone. He was wanted for nothing.

48 posted on 03/08/2012 8:51:42 AM PST by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: JimSEA

Scary, J. Guilt-by-inference/association is what they’re after. I can just see the widespread use of this and the bloody results, now.


49 posted on 03/08/2012 9:33:06 AM PST by Carriage Hill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: carriage_hill
I don't know about Mueller....just like I wasn't sure about Freech back in the toon years....

but Mueller, Freech, the top generals and admirials of this country: when the country needed men to step up and show character, they rested on their laurels and their money and pensions....

50 posted on 03/08/2012 2:44:42 PM PST by cherry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: JoeDetweiler
we're not talking police chases....its apples and oranges....

but muddy the waters with wishy washing sliding slope lanquage....

we all know right from wrong...

51 posted on 03/08/2012 2:46:55 PM PST by cherry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: cherry

Personally, I don’t trust any of them with protecting this country or its citizens.


52 posted on 03/08/2012 6:00:09 PM PST by Carriage Hill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-52 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson