Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Is this why Sandra Fluke went public?
WND ^ | March 6, 2012 | Aaron Klein

Posted on 03/07/2012 6:27:20 AM PST by Sen Jack S. Fogbound

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-40 next last
Interesting, if accurate.
1 posted on 03/07/2012 6:27:25 AM PST by Sen Jack S. Fogbound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Sen Jack S. Fogbound

She won’t sue. I hope she does! Then we’d get to ask her all kinds of questions during deposition and discovery. She’d be a slut under oath and in fear of perjury.


2 posted on 03/07/2012 6:31:30 AM PST by Mamzelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sen Jack S. Fogbound

I’d be highly surprised if this (a perceived weakness in Catholic resolve to oppose contraceptive coverage mandates) was NOT part of the reason. One strikes when the iron is hot, not when it is cold.


3 posted on 03/07/2012 6:32:33 AM PST by HiTech RedNeck (Sometimes progressives find their scripture in the penumbra of sacred bathroom stall writings (Tzar))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mamzelle

The Rats might not want the awareness that such a suit might bring the public to.


4 posted on 03/07/2012 6:34:24 AM PST by HiTech RedNeck (Sometimes progressives find their scripture in the penumbra of sacred bathroom stall writings (Tzar))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: All

As usual, the Dems will overplay this one...


5 posted on 03/07/2012 6:34:43 AM PST by Maverick68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sen Jack S. Fogbound
She's just marginally tied in to the Obot crowd. Remember, she was a "substitute" for the individual the Democrats wanted to have do the testifying in the Congressional committee.

She was obviously not well vetted. Her apparent occupation before coming to Georgetown was actually LOBBYING FOR THE SEX CHANGE INDUSTRY.

This is probably the first time that crowd has gotten anyone hooked into a mainstream Democrat initiative, but there you have it.

I'm not sure the Democrats can build on this coup!

6 posted on 03/07/2012 6:35:58 AM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mamzelle
No, she won't sue. Discovery is the reason. But it's not because she's a slut ~ but because she has been active in lobbying for the sex change industry (in that period of time between her undergraduate years and her arrival at Georgetown Law ~ a good 5 years).

There's a reason she looks like a skinny dude with a $5 wig!

7 posted on 03/07/2012 6:38:00 AM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Sen Jack S. Fogbound

Subpoena White House access lists, including clearance to the Executive Office Building and the Old Executive Office Building. I bet she is on there.


8 posted on 03/07/2012 6:38:05 AM PST by AmericanInTokyo (Imagine the rationalizations on FR to vote for MITT if he wins the nomination. I think I'd throw up)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sen Jack S. Fogbound

Does anyone think, that at some point in the future, Fluke will realize that all that happened was that she got played by the Democratic establishment? Basically, making her a wh**e for them. They put her up there, promised her all sorts of things and when this stuff blows over and isn’t an issue anymore, she’s done. Her 15 minutes are up. No one will answer her call, reply to her texts/emails. Will she realize that the Dem establishment is nothing but a bunch of pimps in dark suits, mooching off the taxpayer?


9 posted on 03/07/2012 6:38:56 AM PST by qaz123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sen Jack S. Fogbound
These things are always orchestrated. Tammy Bruce (and she should know being a former big player in the liberal world) says not even the Rosa Parks/bus incident was happenstance.

"Most Americans believe that the civil-rights struggle was full of serendipity. that it was a spontaneous grassroots movement of average people who wanted to make a difference and improve their lives. Rosa Parks, for example, has been portrayed as an Everywoman who happened to take the bus one day in 1955 and somehow crashed through the barriers of her ordinary, run-of-the-mill life by deciding not to relinquish her seat to a white man.

In truth, the Montgomery, Alabama, chapter of the NAACP had been looking for months for a test case to challenge bus segregation. For this, they needed a bus rider to be arrested so their challenge could move through the courts but it had to be the right sort of bus rider. In fact, Parks wasn’t the first black to refuse to relinquish a seat to a white person. The first to personally challenge bus segregation earlier in 1955 had been 15-year-old Claudette Colvin, followed by another teenager named Mary Louise Smith. The NAACP leaders, however, didn’t think that either of the girls would cut the right kind of figure in court.

Parks was a veteran activist and an officer of the Montgomery NAACP. In actuality, she wielded great power in the chapter; she was the one who had noticed Martin Luther King Jr. and asked him to join the executive committee. She was at the meeting where the Montgomery NAACP leaders considered the possibility of using Colvin or Smith as the test case.

In December of 1955, six weeks after the NAACP’s rejection of the teenagers, Parks was arrested for refusing to give up her seat. Parks told Time magazine, “I did not get on the bus to get anested. I got on the bus to go home” That may have been true for Colvin and Smith but certainly not for Parks, Rosa Parks was a “bus rider" the way Betty Friedan was a 'housewife'."

10 posted on 03/07/2012 6:39:49 AM PST by TennesseeGirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AmericanInTokyo
Under what name? Sandra or Sanford?

Time to check with Dick Cheney's contacts on this one ~ Fluke is outside the mainstream ~ all of them!

11 posted on 03/07/2012 6:39:53 AM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Sen Jack S. Fogbound

This is how Libs win. They control a vast empire of propogandists with national and international reach, funded largely by taxpayer money. Conservatives operate as individuals, or at best, small groups crying into rain barrels, funded locally with private money. Of course the Libs win every national issue. We still haven’t learned.


12 posted on 03/07/2012 6:42:04 AM PST by pabianice (")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sen Jack S. Fogbound; All
Criminey! "Arrested", not "anested". Wish FreeRepublic had a spellcheck lol.
13 posted on 03/07/2012 6:43:13 AM PST by TennesseeGirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sen Jack S. Fogbound
Maloney is a “housewife” from Nassau County NY. The Dims asked her to run because her husband was killed and son crippled on the LIRR by Ferguson. They thought she would win sympathy, a seat and be an anti gun advocate...not that Ferguson hadn't violated at least ten existing Federal, State and Local laws in doing what he did.

Point being she is and was nothing but a puppet of the Dims and this is her doing their bidding

14 posted on 03/07/2012 6:43:42 AM PST by Tuketu (The Dim Platform is splinters bound by crazy glue. We need a solvent)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TennesseeGirl
The bus ride disputes had been a staple of the civil rights movement since the 1940s. My grandmother and I participated in such a dispute in about 1947 in Indianapolis.

The Indiana legislature desegregated EVERYTHING about 1952, but the buses were opened up earlier.

I like to think I had something to do with that.

Now, about the bus rides in the South ~ there were two classes. All were planned or orchestrated, and with good reason. You could get killed by people. No one went alone.

Northern cities were busted fairly easy since they had less of a tradition of murdering blacks. Southern cities were considered very hostile so ALL efforts were very highly organized, and as time demonstrated again and again, if your group was too small, or not well planned when engaged in an event, Southern power structures would arrange for injury and/or death.

15 posted on 03/07/2012 6:45:32 AM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah
emember, she was a "substitute" for the individual the Democrats wanted to have do the testifying in the Congressional committee.

I think she was the individual the Democrats wanted all along, and not the substitute.

The Democrats asked to invite Rev. Barry Lynn, the head of Americans United for Separation of Church and State, and Fluke. The Republicans said they would invite one, per standard procedure, and invited Lynn. There is a 72-hour-rule of notice for witnesses, so one side can gather information about the other side's witness.

The Democrats waited until 4:30 p.m. the day before the hearing and then said "we don't want Lynn, we want Fluke." There wasn't time for the Republicans to learn about Fluke, so they said no.

Here's a story:

GOP: Dems 'played games' over Sandra Fluke

16 posted on 03/07/2012 6:47:15 AM PST by Scoutmaster (You knew the job was dangerous when you took it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Sen Jack S. Fogbound

1) why should elderly on fixed incomes, etc. should pay more taxes so Ms. fluke can have sex?
2) What sincerely aspiring attorney got bumped out of georgetown so that this woman can play political games?


17 posted on 03/07/2012 6:48:26 AM PST by camle (keep an open mind and someone will fill it full of something for you)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: qaz123

She should call Monica and ask her how being ‘Fluked’ by the Left is working out for her long term.


18 posted on 03/07/2012 6:50:10 AM PST by MissMagnolia (Being powerful is like being a lady. If you have to tell people you are, you aren't. (M.Thatcher))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Sen Jack S. Fogbound
Lake was quoted as saying Obama’s stance on contraception is enough to “really irritate” independent suburban moms and “re-engage” young, single women who haven’t tuned into the campaign so far.

Hordes of brain-dead zombies suddenly rising up to vote for free birth control, without reference to the Mengele-esque aspects of the "Death-Care" bill.

Apparently Obama does have a better "story" for this type of voter (Suburban Grifter Nihilist "slut" Voter).

19 posted on 03/07/2012 6:50:19 AM PST by BlatherNaut
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: qaz123
No one will answer her call, reply to her texts/emails.

I don't think so. I think she's now a liberal heroine. If she's not picked up in a high-profile position on the staff of a high-profile lib politician, then she'll be in a liberal think-tank. She'll be called to appear on TV on liberal women's issues, whether they have anything to do with contraception or not.

Remember that others areas of her 'expertise' are human trafficking and abortion.

20 posted on 03/07/2012 6:51:57 AM PST by Scoutmaster (You knew the job was dangerous when you took it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-40 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson