I don’t know about queer, but definitely fugly.
After viewing the entire hearing on c-span, it’s clear that Ms. Fluke did not misrepresent herself. She made it clear that she’s an activist advocate speaking for others. As such she’s very probably over-reaching, but she did make one point that seems to be overlooked in all the subsequent furor.
There are some women with serious legitimate medical problems (e.g. tumors and seizures) that can be controlled only by taking certain (probably expensive) prescription contraceptive medications - not for contraception, but for unrelated medicinal value these drugs happen to provide. It would be good if we could address this issue narrowly, without accepting financial responsibility for recreational contraception.
For any who wish to know the facts of her testimony, here is the link:
http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/HealthandC
She certainly looks it. Reminds me of a young ‘David Brock’. . .or something close.
I suspect that if Ms. Fluke was applying for a job as a female impersonator, she wouldn’t get the job. Enough said...
There is nothing to discuss. The author surrendered by using the Left’s euphemism for perversity in the very title.