Skip to comments.
A-29 Super Tucano Vs AT-6: The “Smoking Hole”
Second Line of Defense ^
| Timperlake
| Ed
Posted on 02/29/2012 9:22:28 AM PST by DefenseMatters
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-35 next last
The commanders on the ground in Afganistan have been urgently requesting Light Air Support for years. Now the only plane built for the mission is NOT ON ITS WAY BOYS! Well done USAF!
To: DefenseMatters
2
posted on
02/29/2012 9:24:37 AM PST
by
grobdriver
(Proud Member, Party Of No! No Socialism - No Fascism - Nobama - No Way!)
To: DefenseMatters
Oh yea, real smart! Cut A-10s when something like this happens. What the hell is happening to the people managing this country and its military?!
To: DefenseMatters
Why don’t they just mount some 30 cal pods on A-10’s? They already have the wing mounts and the aircraft. Plus, if they need to build more A-10’s, they already have the plans and they’re inexpensive.
4
posted on
02/29/2012 9:29:37 AM PST
by
lurk
To: DefenseMatters
A senior USAF acquisition official, who is reportedly leaving soon in any case, did not like the documentation for the award. Leaving for a job at Hawker-Beechcraft?
5
posted on
02/29/2012 9:30:07 AM PST
by
Oztrich Boy
(The law was made for one thing alone, for the exploitation of those who don't understand it.)
To: DefenseMatters
Another complete F-up on this project. The AT-6 isn’t ready, the Super T has been ready for years. Hell of a way to run a war.
6
posted on
02/29/2012 9:33:30 AM PST
by
USNBandit
(sarcasm engaged at all times)
To: DefenseMatters
Do the Ruskies still have some Ilyushin Il-2 Shturmoviks that we can buy? We been fighting insurgents for 10 years now and the US still does not have an appropriate attack aircraft, except for the very capable A-10? If the US gives the contract to AT-6 what is the over/under on development time and cost overruns.
7
posted on
02/29/2012 9:36:38 AM PST
by
C19fan
To: DefenseMatters
To hell with it, do not buy any::
To: USNBandit
Five years from now and ten times the cost per unit, the first AT may be delivered.
To: DefenseMatters
With Obama pulling out of Afghanistan and turning it over to the Taliban, the USAF should buy a bunch of old Sukhoi Su-25 “Frogfoot” attack jets for the Afghan AF and cut them loose. No sense throwing good, new aircraft at these camel jockeys. Buy the stripped-down Su-25s and a bunch of spares. Let the Russians support them because we're out of there.
Cut off all U.S. spare parts, ammo, aid, and everything else that keeps Karzai’s corrupt government alive. As American troops pull out, they should systematically destroy all the infrastructure we've pumped into Afghanistan. We sabotage the equipment and we should hang Karzai and his ministers as we leave.
To: org.whodat
...but Goldman Sachs (half owners of HBC) will have gotten their USAF-sponsored bail-out.
11
posted on
02/29/2012 9:45:49 AM PST
by
paddles
("The more corrupt the state, the more it legislates." Tacitus)
To: Oztrich Boy
If your suggestion is true, then Government has sank to the deepest level of corruption equal to what we accuse the third world nations of.
12
posted on
02/29/2012 9:46:12 AM PST
by
353FMG
To: InsidiousMongo
At a Town Hall Meeting
On the 2008 Campaign Trail
ELDERLY LADY: Now, this Obama, I know he’s a terrorist...
MCCAIN: No, dear...Mr. Obama is not a terrorist.
______________________________
Just once I wish Juan McCain could get just one g-d’ed thing right...
13
posted on
02/29/2012 9:46:51 AM PST
by
AnTiw1
To: paddles
now THAT..... makes sense as to why the production super tucano is out and the on the drawing board at-6 is in...now i understand
14
posted on
02/29/2012 9:52:03 AM PST
by
joe fonebone
(Project Gunwalker, this will make watergate look like the warm up band......)
To: grobdriver
We are not giving Warthogs to the ungrateful Afghans. Hope they get nothing.
15
posted on
02/29/2012 9:53:42 AM PST
by
Tallguy
(It's all 'Fun and Games' until somebody loses an eye!)
To: lurk
Plus, if they need to build more A-10s, they already have the plans and theyre inexpensive. The tooling was scraped when they were declared "obsolete". That's why Crew Chiefs are having to scramble for parts from older, shot up planes to keep newer planes airworthy.
Regards,
GtG
16
posted on
02/29/2012 9:54:44 AM PST
by
Gandalf_The_Gray
(I live in my own little world, I like it 'cuz they know me here.)
To: C19fan
Heck, if we still built turbo-supercharged radials we could hand over some Republic P-47’s or some Douglas A-1’s. They would be ideal.
17
posted on
02/29/2012 9:55:35 AM PST
by
Tallguy
(It's all 'Fun and Games' until somebody loses an eye!)
To: C19fan

Bring back the Douglas Skyraider!
18
posted on
02/29/2012 9:55:41 AM PST
by
smokingfrog
( sleep with one eye open (<o> ---)
To: C19fan
We might be able to buy some IL-10s from the Norks.
19
posted on
02/29/2012 10:00:29 AM PST
by
Little Ray
(FOR the best Conservative in the Primary; AGAINST Obama in the General.)
To: DefenseMatters
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-35 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson