Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

New nuclear reactors set to be OK'd for Georgia
CNN Money ^

Posted on 02/08/2012 6:35:56 PM PST by matt04

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last
In my world world, anyone who sues to stop building/prevent re-licensing of new and safe nuclear plants, get's their power shut off, at random based on the amount of power the nearest plant produces for the state.
1 posted on 02/08/2012 6:36:01 PM PST by matt04
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: matt04

Actually, I thought that TVA had a permit made up last year for a new nuke plant over in the Huntsville area of Alabama. They held a meeting over near Scottsboro, where they wanted to place the plant. Based on local coverage...the people who threw up a fuss during the meeting were asked for their local address, and none of them could cite an address within the state. The local press stayed mostly neutral, and just reported facts...which surprised me to some degree.


2 posted on 02/08/2012 6:41:09 PM PST by pepsionice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: matt04

Great news!


3 posted on 02/08/2012 6:42:45 PM PST by Broker (Many are invited....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: matt04

“High cost...” Gee, does anyone think that the fact that the government hasn’t issued any licenses for decades might have something to do with that?


4 posted on 02/08/2012 6:50:25 PM PST by mvpel (Michael Pelletier)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: matt04

Its about time!


5 posted on 02/08/2012 6:51:03 PM PST by Paradox (I want Obama defeated. Period.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: matt04

This a story I will believe when the plants are up and pumping megawatts


6 posted on 02/08/2012 6:54:47 PM PST by oyez
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: matt04

This a story I will believe when the plants are up and pumping megawatts


7 posted on 02/08/2012 6:55:20 PM PST by oyez
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: matt04
I think no matter how the NRC votes the Administration will find ways to slow and stall every phase this project. Obama is invested in medieval solutions like windmills and water wheels.
8 posted on 02/08/2012 7:01:37 PM PST by Brad from Tennessee (A politician can't give you anything he hasn't first stolen from you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: matt04

Name one Nuclear Reactor Design that is inherently safe when the power goes out in Facility? Meaning power goes out reactor just shuts down and doesn’t explode.


9 posted on 02/08/2012 7:01:53 PM PST by GraceG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: matt04
...the high costs of nuclear power ...

A wind farm that would produce an equivalent amount of energy on an annual basis would cost more.

10 posted on 02/08/2012 7:08:29 PM PST by chimera
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GraceG

I can’t wait to see what improvements have come about over the last thirty years.


11 posted on 02/08/2012 7:09:52 PM PST by Jonty30 (What Islam and secularism have in common is that they are both death cults.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: GraceG
Thorium reactors are supposed to be much safer in that regard. Google TechTalks on YouTube has a good presentation on that.

/johnny

12 posted on 02/08/2012 7:12:42 PM PST by JRandomFreeper (Gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: GraceG

Pebble bed reactor using helium as the working fluid.

It just goes to sleep.

It is also known as a “self-damping reactor.”


13 posted on 02/08/2012 7:15:56 PM PST by patton ("Je pense donc je suis," - My Horse.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: matt04

Unfortunately the democomies are preventing safe clean, nukes. Read up on breeder reactors, fast breeder reactors and gates’s traveling wave reactor.

90% of nuke energy remains in a depleted nuke rod.(300 years of global energy needs already exist in waste) All breeder reactors render that waste safe, some make plutonium, which is critical for manned and unmanned space flight. The democomies since the peanut farmer have said no weapons grade material for the usa, and deal with the waste in the worst way imaginable. (i guess we should shoot it in to the sun, but we’re not allowed to launch it because of the crash risk.)

Shoot the democommies, let the market fix it.


14 posted on 02/08/2012 7:16:14 PM PST by waynesa98
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: matt04

just one little week after the judge’s decision of Obambies eligibility case...Hmmmmmmmmmm


15 posted on 02/08/2012 7:22:40 PM PST by phockthis (http://www.supremelaw.org/fedzone11/index.htm ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GraceG
Fukushima daiichi survived a 9 magnitude earthquake and would have survived a 30-foot tsunami but for human error.

Coal, natural gas, hydro-electric dams, windmills, all have risks.

The greatest risk, though, is to do nothing which means you either freeze to death or starve to death.

16 posted on 02/08/2012 7:31:56 PM PST by Tribune7 (GAS WAS $1.85 per gallon on the day Obama was Inaugurated! - - freeper Gaffer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: waynesa98
...the peanut farmer have said no weapons grade material for the usa,...

The sad thing is, spent fuel from reactors, either LWRs or breeders or whatever, is totally unsuitable as a source of plutonium for nuclear weapons. The reason? Too much 240Pu. The 240Pu essentially "poisons" the material because of its high spontaneous fission rate. That produces neutrons when you don't want them, and causes the weapon to pre-detonate. A special plutonium breeding cycle is needed to minimize the 240Pu while still getting enough 239Pu. It requires the material to be removed at a precise time after the start of irradiation. Obviously, in a reactor, this specialized breeding cycle is not used. You just burn the fuel down as much as possible without regard to optimizing the 239Pu/240Pu ratio.

Carter didn't understand this. Neither do almost all anti-nuclear people who oppose nuclear energy on this basis. When I explain it to most people, it's like an epiphany. Of course, the dogmatic anti-nukes usually mumble some other absurd objection, but when you knock their legs out from under them with scientific arguments, you can see they are really deflated.

17 posted on 02/08/2012 7:32:50 PM PST by chimera
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: GraceG

Naval Nuclear Reactors


18 posted on 02/08/2012 8:00:53 PM PST by seowulf ("If you write a whole line of zeroes, it's still---nothing"...Kira Alexandrovna Argounova)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: matt04

This is a good thing but you need a place to store the waste rather keeping it on site.


19 posted on 02/08/2012 8:01:30 PM PST by U-238
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: U-238

Actually, nuclear waste can be re-used, if it weren’t for Jimmuh Cartah’s idiot regulation forcing people to bury it all. See some of the previous posts.

Notably, the stuff with the longest half-life can be re-used, instead of trying to find a waste dump, which no one wants in their back yard.

It’s still another case of environmentalists doing far more damage to the environment than anyone else.


20 posted on 02/08/2012 8:09:51 PM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson