Posted on 02/04/2012 11:15:57 PM PST by beaversmom
The lawyers have got to go.
You make a good point. I would further build on that by pointing out the pure silliness of allowing porn in public. Forgive if I am wrong, and forgive me for being crass, but isn’t the point of watching pornography to get in the mood for masturbation? I am sure that masturbation in public is illegal since lewd acts are considered illegal in most places. Would they ask the person watching porn to leave if that person was pleasuring himself while doing so?
Pornography is for one purpose only, as you said: selfish gratification. Saying porn in public is fine is basically like saying public masturbating is fine, too.
But I can’t say I blame them. Nothing gets me hot and bothered like a building full of dusty books. /s
Couldn’t the Library staff be charged with aiding and abetting in that instance???
Pornography was not considered “speech” that was protected by the First Amendment for just under the first 200 years of this country.
That is how it should have remained. Leftists, perverts, hedonists and those making money off of them got a leftist dominated SCOTUS to decide the wrong way.
It’s that simple. Porn should go back in the closet along with faggots.
"Information"? Is she serious?
LOL! Yeah, it’s one thing to stumble upon a book about sex positions and quite another to have it staring back at you, full throttle, in living color.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.