I wonder if their constitution allows this. I will gladly pay for a one way ticket for Ginsberg to emigrate to whatever country she would like to park her sorry a$$ in where she could dispense her great wisdom to whoever would bother to listen to her. One condition: If she takes me up on this off, she can't come back.
Justice Ruth “Buzzie” Ginsberg should be impeached and removed from the Supreme Court (after 0bama is defeated). She will never place American interests first.
yawn.
Ruth, call me when the other constitutions have served their nations for 220+ years.
Gives new meaning to the title CONSERVative.
Hope she hangs in there till after January 2013. And I hope the “public” wakes up and sees what is coming if we don’t retire The Messiah.
sooooo
Ginsy
the ANC Marxist model is better than our Constitution eh.
well good...the next 747 leaves soon...be on it.
What would we expect from an Anti-Christian Lawyers Union member?
Thanks, Bill Clinton.
Now you have their reason our Constitution is no good.
This disgusting and demented hag needs a cage.
Here’s a little gem from the South African “Bill of Rights”:
“39. Interpretation of Bill of Rights - When interpreting the Bill of Rights, a court, tribunal or forum must promote the values that underlie an open and democratic society based on human dignity, equality and freedom; must consider international law; and may consider foreign law.”
Read more (if you want to) at: http://www.info.gov.za/documents/constitution/index.htm
Here’s a section from the S. African “Bill of Rights” which I think helps explain why lefties like it so much:
“7. Rights
1) This Bill of Rights is a cornerstone of democracy in South Africa. It enshrines the rights of all people in our country and affirms the democratic values of human dignity, equality and freedom.
2) The state must respect, protect, promote and fulfil the rights in the Bill of Rights.
3) The rights in the Bill of Rights are subject to the limitations contained or referred to in section 36, or elsewhere in the Bill.”
Note the word ‘fulfil’ in 2)
And, finally, based on Section 36 of the S. African “Bill of Rights” I think it can be reasonably concluded that South Africans do not actually HAVE any rights:
“Limitation of rights
36 1) The rights in the Bill of Rights may be limited only in terms of law of general application to the extent that the limitation is reasonable and justifiable in an open and democratic society based on human dignity, equality and freedom, taking into account all relevant factors, including
a. the nature of the right;
b. the importance of the purpose of the limitation;
c. the nature and extent of the limitation;
d. the relation between the limitation and its purpose; and
e. less restrictive means to achieve the purpose.
2) Except as provided in subsection (1) or in any other provision of the Constitution, no law may limit any right entrenched in the Bill of Rights.”
In short, the Constitution of South Africa is nothing but a collection of meaningless leftist ‘catch phrases’ overlain by the formation of an all-powerful government. This, of course, explains why “justice” Ginsberg loves it so much.
We have a great constitution..too bad judges like Ginsberg don’t uphold it.