I wonder if their constitution allows this. I will gladly pay for a one way ticket for Ginsberg to emigrate to whatever country she would like to park her sorry a$$ in where she could dispense her great wisdom to whoever would bother to listen to her. One condition: If she takes me up on this off, she can't come back.
To paraphrase Ginsburg:
“The OLD US Constitution does not allow for the amount of governmental controls that the ruling class finds necessary”
Should be the first issue discussed at the next debate...totally regardless of whatever the first insipid question is.
Dingbat kissing up to They Kenyan.
How about the Zimbabwe constitution?
Does the sickly old bag like the Zimbabwe constitution?
“I will gladly pay for a one way ticket for Ginsberg to emigrate to whatever country she would like to park her sorry a$$”
I suspect she would be comfortable in Hitler’s fascist Germany. If she was around then, I’m sure she would have been at the train station with candy, luring kids to the ovens.
For all these years, this silly beeeotch has been getting paid to uphold the U.S. Constitution. Doesn’t her proclamation of distaste for the U.S Constitution amount to an admission that she has been motivated to undermine the Constitution during her years of work as a Supreme Court Justice? Up to this point, “loose constructionists” have at least claimed to be committed to work within Constitutional limits.
This is sickening. She should be impeached.
Astounding...
The South African constitution, promulgated by Nelson Mandela, came into effect on February 4, 1997. Unlike our outdated old relic, it is one of the most progressive constitutions in the world and basically enshrines some of the libs’ loftiest dream goals for America. I’m sure some of Ginsberg’s favorite parts include these:
* A “Commission for Gender Equality” is explicitly established in the constitution.
* A “Broadcasting Authority” is established to regulate broadcasting and to ensure “fairness” and a “diversity of views”.
* The Bill Of Rights includes the right to equality, prohibiting discrimination on the basis of many things including sexual orientation, marital status, disability, language, age, etc.
* It also includes the right to life, which has been held to prohibit capital punishment, but not prohibit abortion.
* It explicitly includes reproductive rights. “Everyone has the right to bodily and psychological integrity, which includes the right to make decisions concerning reproduction.”
* It permits freedom of speech and expression, but “hate” speech and war propaganda are explicitly excluded.
* Everyone has the right to assemble, peacefully and “unarmed”.
* Includes womens’ suffrage.
* Prohibits depriving anyone of citizenship.
* Includes the right to choose a trade, occupation or profession, though these may be regulated by law.
* Includes the right to unionize and the right to strike. Every trade union has the explicit right to engage in collective bargaining.
* Includes the right to a healthy environment and the right to have the environment protected.
* Includes the rights to food, water, health care (including “reproductive health care”) and social assistance, which the state must progressively realize within the limits of its resources: “The state must take reasonable legislative and other measures, within its available resources, to achieve the progressive realisation of each of these rights.”
* Childrens’ rights include the right to a name and nationality from birth, the right to family or parental care, the right to a basic standard of living, the right to be protected from maltreatment and abuse, the protection from child labor, the right not to be detained except as a last resort, the paramountcy of the best interests of the child and the right to an independent lawyer in court cases involving the child, and the prohibition of the military use of children.
* Includes a universal right to education, which the state must make progressively available and accessible.
* Includes the right to use the language of one’s choice and to participate in the cultural life of one’s choice.
* When interpreting the Bill of Rights, a court, tribunal or forum ”must consider international law; and may consider foreign law.”
Links:
http://www.info.gov.za/documents/constitution/1996/index.htm
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Constitution_of_South_Africa
Sickening.
no, they don't... but it's prolly a safe to say bet they have smarter judges than that old cow“To attack the constitution of a state, says Vattel, and to violate its rules, is a capital crime against the nation”
Having expressed herself thusly as a USSC Justice, it is incumbent on Ginsberg to retire from the USSC forthwith because if she doesn’t understand that she is undermining the US legal system with such statements, she should at least realize that she will never make any headway in subverting the judicial branch with such tactics.
Having expressed herself thusly as a USSC Justice, it is incumbent on Ginsberg to retire from the USSC forthwith because if she doesn’t understand that she is undermining the US legal system with such statements, she should at least realize that she will never make any headway in subverting the judicial branch with such tactics.
Having expressed herself thusly as a USSC Justice, it is incumbent on Ginsberg to retire from the USSC forthwith because if she doesn’t understand that she is undermining the US legal system with such statements, she should at least realize that she will never make any headway in subverting the judicial branch with such tactics.
Having expressed herself thusly as a USSC Justice, it is incumbent on Ginsberg to retire from the USSC forthwith because if she doesn’t understand that she is undermining the US legal system with such statements, she should at least realize that she will never make any headway in subverting the judicial branch with such tactics.
Having expressed herself thusly as a USSC Justice, it is incumbent on Ginsberg to retire from the USSC forthwith because if she doesn’t understand that she is undermining the US legal system with such statements, she should at least realize that she will never make any headway in subverting the judicial branch with such tactics.
Having expressed herself thusly as a USSC Justice, it is incumbent on Ginsberg to retire from the USSC forthwith because if she doesn’t understand that she is undermining the US legal system with such statements, she should at least realize that she will never make any headway in subverting the judicial branch with such tactics.