Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Romney's Cheap and Empty Win
The American Spectator ^ | February 1, 2012 | George Neumayr

Posted on 02/01/2012 4:32:22 AM PST by Cincinatus' Wife

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 161-164 next last
To: Cincinatus' Wife
...outspending Newt by millions -- he still couldn't nail down the rank-and-file vote

And he won't in November, either. It's rather depressing to see that, in a nation of 305,000,000+, a better contender than these two squabbling clowns couldn't be drafted to run against Obama.

Nominating Romney is like an NFL team promising not to throw the ball downfield or in any other way attempt victory, in exchange for the opponent granting them a "graceful and respectable" defeat.

Establishment Republicans embrace minority status. It absolves them of responsibility, yet allows them to retain the perks of status.

They can piss off, IMO.

81 posted on 02/01/2012 6:26:35 AM PST by ScottinVA (Liberal logic: 0bamacare mandate is acceptable... but voter IDs are unconstitutional.Oh, let me gues)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rightwingextremist1776
You can't expect to win without some team building. I believe that is what Palin is up to.....and where we need the help the most.

I disagree. Palin is about....well Palin. She sucked money, coverage and devotion away from the very farm team you speak of at a very crucial time in late 2010 and well into 2011 until it was too late for the farm team to step in.

82 posted on 02/01/2012 6:26:43 AM PST by joesbucks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

Let’s face it. George W. Bush was just another big-tent liberal Republican like Dole, McCain, and Romney.

He just happened to get elected twice because the alternatives were worse.

Notice that “Obama is worse” is the only argument that the Romney supporters have. It’s the only argument that Romney himself has.


83 posted on 02/01/2012 6:26:53 AM PST by oblomov
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Happy Rain

I won’t vote for Romney in the general. I honestlynwould rather hve for more years of liberal, lying Obama than 8 years of liberal, lying Romney.


84 posted on 02/01/2012 6:34:18 AM PST by KansasGirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: KansasGirl; Happy Rain

Let me try again...

I won’t vote for Romney in the general. I would honestly rather have four more years of liberal, lying Obama than eight years of liberal, lying Romney.


85 posted on 02/01/2012 6:37:05 AM PST by KansasGirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

Can he buy a lot of votes?
Willy-Boy, Willy-Boy.
Can he buy a lot of votes?
Charming Willy.

He can buy a lot of votes,
In a twinkling of his eye.
But he’s cool shark,
And cannot leave his PAC Men.


86 posted on 02/01/2012 6:37:53 AM PST by Graewoulf (( obama"care" violates the 1890 Sherman Anti-Trust Law, AND is illegal by the U.S. Constitution.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KansasGirl

A stealth socialist, like Romney, can do a lot more damage, than a socialist who doesn’t hide it, like Obama.


87 posted on 02/01/2012 6:39:39 AM PST by dfwgator (Don't wake up in a roadside ditch. Get rid of Romney.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

I felt as sick to my stomach when I heard this news today as I did when I heard 0 bummer won in 2008.


88 posted on 02/01/2012 6:43:42 AM PST by Arrowhead1952 (Dear God, thanks for the rain, but please let it rain more in Texas. Amen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: oblomov

From where I’m sitting, it’s beginning to look like the R and the D party elites are dead set on Obama-RomneyCare becoming part of our lives — as the masses become more locked to them, their power base is more set. They’re unabashedly exempted from this healthcare system designed just for us. And they pick and choose who else can be exempted. The whole thing stinks to high heaven.


89 posted on 02/01/2012 6:45:48 AM PST by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: GeronL

Thanks!

LLS


90 posted on 02/01/2012 6:52:43 AM PST by LibLieSlayer (Hey repubic elite scumbags... jam mitt up your collective arses!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: Progov

Wait until Romney gets the Republican nomination.Then you will find out how the media really feels about him.


91 posted on 02/01/2012 6:53:09 AM PST by sport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Obadiah

I am with you... ON MY SACRED HONOR I WILL NOT VOTE FOR mitt.

LLS


92 posted on 02/01/2012 6:55:40 AM PST by LibLieSlayer (Hey repubic elite scumbags... jam mitt up your collective arses!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

It’s important to note some details about Florida.

First of all, remember that it is an East Coast state downstate, and a red state in the northern panhandle. And this bodes ill for Romney, because Gingrich was a hands down winner in the panhandle.

The East Coast part of Florida has a lot of winter residents from more northern East Coast states, who are uniformly liberal. Think of the politics of Republicans in those states, so liberal that New York has a separate Conservative party.

So the bottom line is that Romney is going to get the blue states, Gingrich will get the red states, and hopefully neither will have enough delegates going into the convention to get the nomination on the first ballot.


93 posted on 02/01/2012 6:56:14 AM PST by yefragetuwrabrumuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheRobb7

Delegates are not rewarded in MO’s primary but a caucus held later. Newt is not on the ballot for the MO primary. I think that Santorum would win the MO primary. Strange thing is, he is only running ads in CO and Nevada against Newt. None against Romney anywhere.. Doesn’t make much sense as MO is his real opportunity to show that he can unite the conservative base. Why no ads against Romney in MO, Rick?


94 posted on 02/01/2012 6:58:55 AM PST by KansasGirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: LibLieSlayer; ScottinVA; Ozymandias Ghost; ontap
Do not forget... the same people that promote romney are the very ones that made it impossible for any of the people that you referenced to run.

Do not forget... the same people that promote romney are still the very same ones that tried to prevent Reagan from winning the nomination.

And they (Doles, etc) don't have anywhere near the power that the liberal Democrats and Marxist Media have.

So what then?

If it's too hard to expect Sarah to run, who, indeed, has been through the Cain sausage grinder, then what?

Start a new party and face even more opposition?

I think the reason we had few (if any) good conservative candidates running this time is because the dumbed-down electorate has long past hit the tipping point. They don't want a message of responsibility and hard work in the face of towering competition, and so we get candidates who don't either.

95 posted on 02/01/2012 6:59:21 AM PST by sam_paine (X .................................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

Unfortunately, Romney is the least objectionable candidate — the default candidate. Gingrich is a failed Speaker of the House, voted out by his own party; Santorum is a failed Senator, who could not win his state’s election; and Paul has a whacko foreign policy.


96 posted on 02/01/2012 7:01:22 AM PST by JoeGar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JoeGar
Unfortunately, Romney is the least objectionable candidate — the default candidate. Gingrich is a failed Speaker of the House, voted out by his own party; Santorum is a failed Senator, who could not win his state’s election; and Paul has a whacko foreign policy.

If you are a conservative republican, then you should be behind the most conservative candidate, that also has a chance of winning in the general election, and that sure as hell isn't Romney.
97 posted on 02/01/2012 7:07:23 AM PST by ZX12R (FUBO GTFO 2012 ! We should take off and Newt washington from orbit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

Comment #98 Removed by Moderator

To: txrangerette

“Your SOLUTION is?...”

My solution is as it I have articulated for weeks

No Newt, No Romney, Yes to a brokered convention.

THIS will be where the rubber meets the road for conservatives. If they want as much conservatism in their nominee as possible (we have to be realistic) that is the only way to get it. Newt was never the guy, and we don’t need to rehash that.

A brokered convention with an activist grass roots gives conservatives the best shot this time around.

This is where we are. It’s where we’ve been for some time, but we needed the Newt-ers to get it out of their system first.


99 posted on 02/01/2012 7:24:23 AM PST by RFEngineer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
They usually lose the center while sapping the spirit of the party's conservative base.

This.

100 posted on 02/01/2012 7:29:00 AM PST by kevao
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 161-164 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson